• صفحه اصلی
  • پیش‎بینی تغییرات عرضه خدمات اکوسیستمی مرتبط با تنوع زیستی تحت تاثیر تغییرات کاربری اراضی در حوزه آبخیز شفارود استان گیلان

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : JEST-2112-5585 (R1) بازدید : 93 صفحه: 109 - 124

10.30495/jest.2023.64789.5585

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

پیش‎بینی تغییرات عرضه خدمات اکوسیستمی مرتبط با تنوع زیستی تحت تاثیر تغییرات کاربری اراضی در حوزه آبخیز شفارود استان گیلان

محورهای موضوعی : اکوسیستم ها

ستاره مهرخو 1 (دانشجوی دکتری، علوم محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.)
مهدی رمضانی 2 (دانشیار گروه علوم محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات))
پروین فرشچی 3 (استادیار گروه علوم محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.)
مصطفی پناهی 4 (دانشیار گروه اقتصاد محیط زیست و انرژی، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست ، دانشگاه آزاداسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.)
سید مسعود منوری 5 (دانشیار گروه علوم محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و محیط زیست، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/09/24 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/12/07 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/07/01

کلید واژه: ضریب کاپا, تخریب زیستگاه, InVEST, لندست, کیفیت زیستگاه,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: تغییرات شدید کاربری اراضی طی دهه های اخیر توان اکوسیستم‌ها در عرضه خدمات را به شدت تحت تاثیر قرار داده است. به همین جهت آگاهی از روند این تغییرات و تاثیر آن بر خدمات اکوسیستمی برای مدیریت پایدار سرزمین ضروری است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارزیابی تاثیر تغییرات کاربری اراضی بر خدمات اکوسیستمی مرتبط با تنوع زیستی حوزه آبخیز شفارود انجام گرفته است.روش بررسی: پژوهش حاضر شامل سه مرحله 1) استخراج نقشه کاربری اراضی گذشته و حال با استفاده از تصاویر ماهواره ای لندست و با بکارگیری نرم‎افزار ENVI 5.3 و ArcGIS 10.3 2) پیش‎بینی و استخراج نقشه کاربری اراضی آینده با استفاده از ابزار Scenario Genarator نرم‎افزار InVEST و در نهایت 3) ارزیابی کمی و مدلسازی تنوع زیستی با استفاده از مدل Habitat Quality نرم‎افزار InVEST می باشد.یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که کیفیت زیستگاه در طول زمان، تحت تاثیر تغییرات کاربری اراضی به شدت کاهش یافته و تخریب زیستگاه به شدت افزایش پیدا کرده است به طوری که متوسط کیفیت زیستگاه برای کل محدوده مورد مطالعه برای سال های 2000، 2020 و 2040 به ترتیب برابر با 88/0، 64/0 و 41/0 است. همچنین متوسط تخریب زیستگاه برای کل حوزه آبخیز شفارود در سال 2000 برابر با 0021/0، در سال 2020 برابر با 0042/0 و برای سال 2040 برابر با 0061/0 است.بحث و نتیجه گیری: طبق نتایج به دست آمده می‌توان استدلال کرد که افزایش فعالیت‌های توسعه ای انسانی با هدف تملک اراضی طبیعی و بهره کشی از آن، خسارات جبران‎ناپذیری را بر پیکره اراضی طبیعی و زیستگاه های گیاهی و حیوانی جانوری وارد آورده است و ادامه چنین روندی خطر نابودی کامل این منابع منحصر به فرد را به دنبال خواهد داشت.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: Severe land use change in recent decades has affected the ability of ecosystems to provide services, so it is necessary to be aware of the trend of these changes and their impact on ecosystem services for sustainable land management. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of land use change on biodiversity services in the Shafarood watershed in Gilan province.Material and Methodology: The present study consists of three steps: 1) Extraction of past and present land use maps using Landsat satellite images using ENVI 5.3 and ArcGIS 10.3 software 2) Prediction and extraction of future land use maps using Scenario Generator tool of InVEST software and finally 3) Quantitative evaluation and modeling and mapping of ecosystem services related to biodiversity using the Habitat Quality model of InVEST software.Findings: The results showed that habitat quality has decreased sharply over time under the influence of land use changes, and habitat degradation has increased sharply so that the average habitat quality for the entire study area for 2000, 2020, and 2040 are equal to 0.88, 0.64, and 0.41respectively. Also, the average habitat destruction for the whole Shafarood watershed in 2000 is equal to 0.0021, in 2020 equal to 0.0042, and for 2040 equal to 0.0061.Discussion and Conclusion: According to the obtained results, it can be argued that the increase of human development activities with the aim of acquiring and exploiting natural lands has caused irreparable damage to the structure of natural lands and plant and animal habitats and the continuation of such a process will lead to the risk of complete destruction of these unique resources.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Costanza, R. Arge, R. Groot, R. Farber, S. Grasso, M. Hannon, B. Limberg, K. Naeem, Neill, R. V. Paruelo, J. Raskin, R. G. Sutton, P. Van Den Belt, M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253- 260.
    2.
  2. De Groot, R.S.; Wilson, M.A. & Boumans, R.M. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological economics, 41(3), pp.393-408.
    3.
  3. Ehrlich, P.R. & Ehrlich. A.H. 1981. Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. Random House, New York.
    4.
  4. MEA [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment]. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
    5.
  5. Khan, I., & Zhao, M. 2019. Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 821–831.
    6.
  6. Asadolahi, Z., and Norouzi Nazar M.S. 2020. Quantifying the Soil Erosion Control Ecosystem Service Under Climate Change in Gorganroud Watershed. Environmental Researches, 11(21), 3-16. (In Persian)
    7.
  7. Legesse, D., Vallet-Coulomb, C., & Gasse, F. (2003). Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: Case study south central Ethiopia. Journal of Hydrology, 275(1–2), 67–85.
    8.
  8. Wardrop, D. H., Glasmeier, A. K., Peterson-Smith, J., Ingram, H., Eckles, D., & Brooks, R. P. (2011). Wetland ecosystem services and coupled socioeconomic benefits through conservation practices in the Appalachian Region. Ecological Applications, 21(sp1), 93–115.
    9.
  9. Lang, Y., Song, W., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Responses of the water-yield ecosystem service to climate and land use change in Sancha River Basin, China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 101, 102–111.
    10.
  10. Song, W., & Deng, X. (2017). Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Science of the Total Environment, 576, 705–719.
    11.
  11. DeFries, R.S.; Foley, J.A. & Asner, G.P. 2004. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5), pp.249-257.
    12.
  12. Asadolahi, Z., and Salman Mahini, A. 2017. Assessing the Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services Supply (Carbon Storage and Sequestration). Environmental Researches, 8(15): 203-214. (In Persian)
    13.
  13. Amiri, M.J., Asgaripor, A., Zoghi, M. 2021. Land cover changes Assessment in Malayer using landscape metrics. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(11): 183-193. (In Persian)
    14.
  14. Wang, Z., Mao, D., Li, L., Jia, M., Dong, Z., Miao, Z., Ren, C., & Song, C. (2015). Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992–2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China. Science of the Total Environment, 514 (2015): 119–130.
    15.
  15. Gao, J., Li, F., Gao, H., Zhou, C., & Zhang, X. (2017). The impact of land-use changes on water-related ecosystem services: a study of the Guishui River Basin, Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163 (2017): 148-155.
    16.
  16. Lang, Y., Song, W., & Deng, X. (2018). Projected land use changes impact on water yields in the karst mountain areas of China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 104, 66-75.
    17.
  17. Bai, Y., Ochuodhoa, T.O., Yang, J. 2019. Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA. Ecological Indicators, 102: 51-64.
    18.
  18. Zarandian, A., Yavari, A.R., Jafari, H.R., Amirnejad, H. 2016. Modeling of Land Cover Change Impacts on Habitat Quality of a Forested Landscape in the Sarvelat and Javaherdasht. Environmental Researches, 6(12): 183-194. (In Persian)
    19.
  19. Sarbaz, M., Morovati, M., Tazeh, M. Investigation of the Effect of Land Change / Land Cover on the Supply of Habitat Services (Case Study: Ors Sistan Protected Area). Environmental Researches, 10 (20): 235-246. (In Persian)
    20.
  20. Moarrab, Y., Salehi, E., Amiri, M.J., Hoveidi, H. Analyzing ecological security of land use changes in Lavasanat Basin using ecosystem services (water production). Scientific Research Quarterly of Geographical Data, 30 (118): 59-75. (In Persian)
    21.
  21. Daneshi, A., Najafinejad, A., Panahi, M., Zarandian, A. 2020. Projecting Land Use Change Effects on Habitat Quality of Narmab Dam Basin in Golestan Province. Degradation and Rehabilitation of Natural Land, 1(1): 120-131. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. Rostamtabar, M., Feiznia, S., Shoaii, Z. 2016. Mineralogy Investigation of Sediments of Riverbed in Shafarood Watershed, Gilan Province for Determining the Rate of Erosion and Sedimentation. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 69(1): 79-92. (In Persian)
    23.
  23. Rasouli A.A. 2008. Basics of applied remote sensing with emphasis on satellite image processing. Tabriz University Press, 777 p. (In Persian)
    24.
  24. Veldkamp, A. & Lambin, E.F. 5002. Predicting land-use change. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 82(2), 2-9.
    25.
  25. Sharp, R., Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A.D., Wood, S.A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., Kennedy, C., Verutes, G., Kim, C.K., Guannel, G., Papenfus, M., Toft, J., Marsik, M., Bernhardt, J., Grif- fin, R., Glowinski, K., Chaumont, N., Perelman, A., Lacayo, M., Mandle, L., Hamel, P. and Vogl, A.L. 2018. InVEST User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford.
    26.
  26. Nematollahi, Sh., Fakheran, S., Jafari, A., Reisi, T., Pourmanafi, S. 2020. Landscape Planning for Conservation, based on the InVEST Model of Habitat Quality and Ecological Impact Assessment of Road Network in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 8(4): 67-81. (In Persian)
    27.
  27. Zabihi, M., Moradi, H.R., Khaledi Darvishan, A., Gholamalifard, M. 2021. Application of InVEST Ecosystem Services Model to Prioritize Subwatersheds of Talar in term of Soil Erosion, Sediment Retention and Yield. Environment and water Engineering, 7(2): 293-303. (In Persian)
    28.
  28. Ochoa, V. and Urbina-Cardona, N. 2017. Tools for spatially modeling ecosystem services: publication trends, conceptual reflections and future challenges. Ecosystem Services, 26: 155-169.
    29.

 

 

 

 

_||_

  1. Costanza, R. Arge, R. Groot, R. Farber, S. Grasso, M. Hannon, B. Limberg, K. Naeem, Neill, R. V. Paruelo, J. Raskin, R. G. Sutton, P. Van Den Belt, M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253- 260.
    2.
  2. De Groot, R.S.; Wilson, M.A. & Boumans, R.M. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological economics, 41(3), pp.393-408.
    3.
  3. Ehrlich, P.R. & Ehrlich. A.H. 1981. Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. Random House, New York.
    4.
  4. MEA [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment]. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
    5.
  5. Khan, I., & Zhao, M. 2019. Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 821–831.
    6.
  6. Asadolahi, Z., and Norouzi Nazar M.S. 2020. Quantifying the Soil Erosion Control Ecosystem Service Under Climate Change in Gorganroud Watershed. Environmental Researches, 11(21), 3-16. (In Persian)
    7.
  7. Legesse, D., Vallet-Coulomb, C., & Gasse, F. (2003). Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: Case study south central Ethiopia. Journal of Hydrology, 275(1–2), 67–85.
    8.
  8. Wardrop, D. H., Glasmeier, A. K., Peterson-Smith, J., Ingram, H., Eckles, D., & Brooks, R. P. (2011). Wetland ecosystem services and coupled socioeconomic benefits through conservation practices in the Appalachian Region. Ecological Applications, 21(sp1), 93–115.
    9.
  9. Lang, Y., Song, W., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Responses of the water-yield ecosystem service to climate and land use change in Sancha River Basin, China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 101, 102–111.
    10.
  10. Song, W., & Deng, X. (2017). Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Science of the Total Environment, 576, 705–719.
    11.
  11. DeFries, R.S.; Foley, J.A. & Asner, G.P. 2004. Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5), pp.249-257.
    12.
  12. Asadolahi, Z., and Salman Mahini, A. 2017. Assessing the Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Services Supply (Carbon Storage and Sequestration). Environmental Researches, 8(15): 203-214. (In Persian)
    13.
  13. Amiri, M.J., Asgaripor, A., Zoghi, M. 2021. Land cover changes Assessment in Malayer using landscape metrics. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(11): 183-193. (In Persian)
    14.
  14. Wang, Z., Mao, D., Li, L., Jia, M., Dong, Z., Miao, Z., Ren, C., & Song, C. (2015). Quantifying changes in multiple ecosystem services during 1992–2012 in the Sanjiang Plain of China. Science of the Total Environment, 514 (2015): 119–130.
    15.
  15. Gao, J., Li, F., Gao, H., Zhou, C., & Zhang, X. (2017). The impact of land-use changes on water-related ecosystem services: a study of the Guishui River Basin, Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163 (2017): 148-155.
    16.
  16. Lang, Y., Song, W., & Deng, X. (2018). Projected land use changes impact on water yields in the karst mountain areas of China. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 104, 66-75.
    17.
  17. Bai, Y., Ochuodhoa, T.O., Yang, J. 2019. Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA. Ecological Indicators, 102: 51-64.
    18.
  18. Zarandian, A., Yavari, A.R., Jafari, H.R., Amirnejad, H. 2016. Modeling of Land Cover Change Impacts on Habitat Quality of a Forested Landscape in the Sarvelat and Javaherdasht. Environmental Researches, 6(12): 183-194. (In Persian)
    19.
  19. Sarbaz, M., Morovati, M., Tazeh, M. Investigation of the Effect of Land Change / Land Cover on the Supply of Habitat Services (Case Study: Ors Sistan Protected Area). Environmental Researches, 10 (20): 235-246. (In Persian)
    20.
  20. Moarrab, Y., Salehi, E., Amiri, M.J., Hoveidi, H. Analyzing ecological security of land use changes in Lavasanat Basin using ecosystem services (water production). Scientific Research Quarterly of Geographical Data, 30 (118): 59-75. (In Persian)
    21.
  21. Daneshi, A., Najafinejad, A., Panahi, M., Zarandian, A. 2020. Projecting Land Use Change Effects on Habitat Quality of Narmab Dam Basin in Golestan Province. Degradation and Rehabilitation of Natural Land, 1(1): 120-131. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. Rostamtabar, M., Feiznia, S., Shoaii, Z. 2016. Mineralogy Investigation of Sediments of Riverbed in Shafarood Watershed, Gilan Province for Determining the Rate of Erosion and Sedimentation. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 69(1): 79-92. (In Persian)
    23.
  23. Rasouli A.A. 2008. Basics of applied remote sensing with emphasis on satellite image processing. Tabriz University Press, 777 p. (In Persian)
    24.
  24. Veldkamp, A. & Lambin, E.F. 5002. Predicting land-use change. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 82(2), 2-9.
    25.
  25. Sharp, R., Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A.D., Wood, S.A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., Kennedy, C., Verutes, G., Kim, C.K., Guannel, G., Papenfus, M., Toft, J., Marsik, M., Bernhardt, J., Grif- fin, R., Glowinski, K., Chaumont, N., Perelman, A., Lacayo, M., Mandle, L., Hamel, P. and Vogl, A.L. 2018. InVEST User's Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford.
    26.
  26. Nematollahi, Sh., Fakheran, S., Jafari, A., Reisi, T., Pourmanafi, S. 2020. Landscape Planning for Conservation, based on the InVEST Model of Habitat Quality and Ecological Impact Assessment of Road Network in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province. Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology, 8(4): 67-81. (In Persian)
    27.
  27. Zabihi, M., Moradi, H.R., Khaledi Darvishan, A., Gholamalifard, M. 2021. Application of InVEST Ecosystem Services Model to Prioritize Subwatersheds of Talar in term of Soil Erosion, Sediment Retention and Yield. Environment and water Engineering, 7(2): 293-303. (In Persian)
    28.
  28. Ochoa, V. and Urbina-Cardona, N. 2017. Tools for spatially modeling ecosystem services: publication trends, conceptual reflections and future challenges. Ecosystem Services, 26: 155-169.
    29.

 

 

 

 

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]