• صفحه اصلی
  • بررسی کارایی تالاب مصنوعی سطحی حاوی گیاه نی در حذف برخی پیراسنجه-های شیمیایی فاضلاب شهرک صنعتی بوعلی

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : 1343-JEST (R2) بازدید : 66 صفحه: 1 - 8

10.22034/jest.2019.8530

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

بررسی کارایی تالاب مصنوعی سطحی حاوی گیاه نی در حذف برخی پیراسنجه-های شیمیایی فاضلاب شهرک صنعتی بوعلی

محورهای موضوعی : آلودگی محیط زیست (آب و فاضلاب)

فرشته پی نبر 1 (دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد محیط‌زیست، دانشکده علوم پایه، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران.)
سهیل سبحان اردکانی 2 (دانشیار گروه محیط‌زیست، دانشکده علوم پایه، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران)
مهدی ریاحی خرم 3 (استادیار گروه محیط‌زیست، دانشکده علوم پایه، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1392/11/13 تاریخ پذیرش : 1393/10/30 تاریخ انتشار : 1398/05/01

کلید واژه: شهرک صنعتی بوعلی همدان, گیاه نی, COD, TSS, تالاب مصنوعی سطحی,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ برای تصفیه فاضلاب ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺁﺏ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ، ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺣﺎﻳﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﺭﻭﺵ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﭘﺎﻻﻳﺶ ﺁﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺷـﻬﺮﻱ در تالاب مصنوعی حاوی نی، ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ، نیاز به ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ساده ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻛﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﭘﺎﻻﻳﺶ، ﺭﻭﺷﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺁﻻﻳﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ. بنابراین، این پژوهش با هدف بررسی کارایی حذف و یا کاهش برخی پیراسنجه های شیمیایی فاضلاب شهرک صنعتی بوعلی همدان به وسیله گیاه نی در تالاب مصنوعی سطحی انجام یافته است. روش بررسی: سه راکتور به صورت پایلوت به روش تالاب مصنوعی سطحی با زمان ماند دو روز ساخته شد. نمونه ها با استفاده از ظروف مخصوص نمونه برداری از ورودی و خروجی رآکتور برداشت و مطابق با روش های استاندارد آنالیز شد و در نهایت داده ها با استفاده از نرم افزار آماری SPSS مورد پردازش قرار گرفتند. یافته ها: نتایج بیانگر آن بود که کارایی حذف اکسیژن خواهی شیمیایی و کل جامدات معلق به ترتیب برابر با %75 و %80 بود. بحث و نتیجه گیری: اگرچه کارایی حذف پیراسنجه های مورد ارزیابی در تالاب مصنوعی سطحی حاوی گیاه نیطی زمان ماند دو روز قابل توجه می باشد، اما با توجه به بالابودن غلظت پیراسنجه ها در خروجی تالاب، فاضلاب تصفیه شده شهرک صنعتی بوعلی از شرایط استاندارد برای استفاده در سایر کاربری ها به ویژه کشاورزی برخوردار نیست.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: Selection of appropriate technologies for wastewater treatment according to climate, economic and social conditions is very important. The use of non-advanced technology with low energy consumption wastewater treatment systems such as a constructed wetland is cost effective and contributes to environmental reclamation. The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of surface flow constructed wetland in the removal of COD and TSS parameters from Bu-Ali industrial town wastewater. Method: For the removal of COD and TSS parameters from Bu-Ali industrial town wastewater, three shallow artificial wetlands with retention time of 2 days were made as pilot. The samples were collected using specific containers from the input and output of the reactor and analyzed according to the standard methods. The obtained data were analyzed using the SPSS 18.0 statistical package. Findings: The results showed that the removal efficiencies of COD and TSS were 75% and 80% respectively. Discussion and Conclusion: Although the removal efficiencies of COD and TSS in the surface flow constructed wetland containing Phragmites australis are acceptable, the treated wastewater is not suitable for irrigation because of the high concentration of organic matter at the wetland output.

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Hammer, D.A. 2002. Handbook of Surfactant Analysis. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, pp. 18-25.
    2.
  2. Sobhanardakani, S., Habibi, M., Behbahaninia, A. 2015. Investigation of accumulation of Pb and Cd in tissue of leek (Allium ampeloprasum persicum) and peppermint (Mentha piperita) treated with sewage sludge of Qods Town treatment plant, Tehran. Journal of Food Hygiene, 5(3): 21-30. (In Persian)
    3.
  3. Sobhanardakani, S.,Jafari, S.M., Ehteshami, M. 2016.Evaluation of efficiency of electrochemical process for COD and TSS removal from raisin finishing wastewater. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18(SI 2): 493-506. (In Persian)
    4.
  4. Martin, E.J., Martin, E.T. 1991. Technologies for Small Water and Wastewater System. 1th ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York.
    5.
  5. Marcos, V.S. 1996. Comparison among the most frequently used systems for wastewater treatment countries, Water Science and Technology, 33(3): 59-72.
    6.
  6. Brix, H 1993. Macrophyte-mediate oxygen transfers in wetland: Transport mechanisms and rate. In: Moshiri, G.A. (Ed.), Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Ann Arbor, London, Tokyo, p. 391-398.
    7.
  7. Liao, X., Lou, S., Wu, Y., Wang, Z. 2003. Studies on the abilities of Vetiveria zizanioides and Cyperus alternifolius for ping farm wastewater treatment, Proceedings of the Third International Vetiver Conference, Guangzhou, China.
    8.
  8. Cheng, X.Y., Liang, M.Q., Chen, W.Y., Liu, X.C., Chen, Z.H. 2009. Growth and contaminant removal effect of several plant in constructed wetlands, Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 51(3): 325-335.
    9.
  9. Higgins, M.J., Rock, C.A., Bouchard, R. 1993. Controlling Agricultural Run-off by the Use of Constructed Wetlands. In Constructed Wetland for Water Quality Improvement; Moshiri, G.A., Ed; lewis Publisher: Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 359-367.
    10.
  10. Moore, M.T., Rodgers, J.H., Cooper, C.M., Smith, S.Jr. 2000. Constructed wetland for mitigation of Atrazine- associated agricultural runoff. Environmental Pollution, 110(3): 393-399.
    11.
  11. Vymazal, J., Kröpfelová, L. 2008. Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands with Horizontal Sub-Surface Flow, Springer, 566 p.   
    12.
  12. Kadlec, R.H., Knight, R.L. 1996. Treatment Wetlands, CRC Press/Lewis Publisher: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
    13.
  13. Watson, J.T., Reed, S.C., Kadlec, R.H., Knight, R.L., Whitehouse, A.E. 1991. Performance Expectations and Loading Rates for Constructed Wetlands. In Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment; Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural. ed. Hammer, D.A. Lewis Publishing, Inc, pp. 319-353.
    14.
  14. Calheiros António, O.S.S., Rangel, B., Paula, M.L., Castro, H.L., Cristina, S.C. 2009. Treatment of industrial wastewater with two-stage constructed wetlands planted with Typha latifolia and Phragmites australis, Bioresource Technology, 100: 3205-3213.
    15.
  15. Van Oostrom, A.J., Russell, J.M. 1992. Denitrification in constructed wastewater wetlands receiving high concentrations of nitrate, Water Science and Technology, 29(4): 7-14.
    16.
  16. Sobhanardakani, S., Ayatollahi, S., Ehteshami, M., Hossein-Shahi, D., Ghelmani, S.V., Salehi-Vaziri, A., Talebi, P. 2013. The efficiency of Typha Latifolica in subsurface flow constructed wetland for wastewater treatment. Journal of Health & Development, 1(4): 265-274. (In Persian)
    17.
  17. Ghaderi, A. 2004. Investigation of Wetland Plants Role as a Natural Treatment for the Urban Polluted Water in Tehran, With Artificial Canebrake. Geography and Development, 2(3): 107-120. (In Persian)
    18.
  18. Borghei, M., Nourbakhsh, S.M.R. 2002. Survey of industrial wastewater treatment of Isfahan Refinery using artificial wetland. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4(4): 15-24. (In Persian)
    19.
  19. Cheng, B., Hu, C.W., Zhao, Y.J. 2011. Effects of plants development and pollutant loading on performance of vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland, International Journal of Environmental Sciencd and Technology, 8(1): 177-186.
    20.
  20. Gersberg, R.M., Elkins, B.V., Lyon, S.R., Goldman, C.R. 1986. Role of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment by artificial wetlands, Water Research, 20(3): 363-368.
    21.
  21. Sobhanardakani, S.,Mehrabi, Z., Ehteshami, M. 2014.Effect of aquaculture farms wastewater on physicochemical parameters of Kabkian River, 2011-12. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 24(113): 140-149. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF). 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edition, Washington, D.C., USA, p. 541.
    23.
  23. Ehrampoosh, M.H., Karimi, B., Rahimi, S., Talebi, P., Ghalmani, S.V. 2007. Survey of removal efficiency of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) and organic matters from city of Yazd municipal wastewater in the first six months of the year 2008 using subsurface flow constructed wetland. Toloo-e- Behdasht, 6(3-4): 74-84. (In Persian)
    24.

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

_||_

  1. Hammer, D.A. 2002. Handbook of Surfactant Analysis. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, pp. 18-25.
    2.
  2. Sobhanardakani, S., Habibi, M., Behbahaninia, A. 2015. Investigation of accumulation of Pb and Cd in tissue of leek (Allium ampeloprasum persicum) and peppermint (Mentha piperita) treated with sewage sludge of Qods Town treatment plant, Tehran. Journal of Food Hygiene, 5(3): 21-30. (In Persian)
    3.
  3. Sobhanardakani, S.,Jafari, S.M., Ehteshami, M. 2016.Evaluation of efficiency of electrochemical process for COD and TSS removal from raisin finishing wastewater. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18(SI 2): 493-506. (In Persian)
    4.
  4. Martin, E.J., Martin, E.T. 1991. Technologies for Small Water and Wastewater System. 1th ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York.
    5.
  5. Marcos, V.S. 1996. Comparison among the most frequently used systems for wastewater treatment countries, Water Science and Technology, 33(3): 59-72.
    6.
  6. Brix, H 1993. Macrophyte-mediate oxygen transfers in wetland: Transport mechanisms and rate. In: Moshiri, G.A. (Ed.), Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Ann Arbor, London, Tokyo, p. 391-398.
    7.
  7. Liao, X., Lou, S., Wu, Y., Wang, Z. 2003. Studies on the abilities of Vetiveria zizanioides and Cyperus alternifolius for ping farm wastewater treatment, Proceedings of the Third International Vetiver Conference, Guangzhou, China.
    8.
  8. Cheng, X.Y., Liang, M.Q., Chen, W.Y., Liu, X.C., Chen, Z.H. 2009. Growth and contaminant removal effect of several plant in constructed wetlands, Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 51(3): 325-335.
    9.
  9. Higgins, M.J., Rock, C.A., Bouchard, R. 1993. Controlling Agricultural Run-off by the Use of Constructed Wetlands. In Constructed Wetland for Water Quality Improvement; Moshiri, G.A., Ed; lewis Publisher: Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 359-367.
    10.
  10. Moore, M.T., Rodgers, J.H., Cooper, C.M., Smith, S.Jr. 2000. Constructed wetland for mitigation of Atrazine- associated agricultural runoff. Environmental Pollution, 110(3): 393-399.
    11.
  11. Vymazal, J., Kröpfelová, L. 2008. Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetlands with Horizontal Sub-Surface Flow, Springer, 566 p.   
    12.
  12. Kadlec, R.H., Knight, R.L. 1996. Treatment Wetlands, CRC Press/Lewis Publisher: Boca Raton, FL, USA.
    13.
  13. Watson, J.T., Reed, S.C., Kadlec, R.H., Knight, R.L., Whitehouse, A.E. 1991. Performance Expectations and Loading Rates for Constructed Wetlands. In Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment; Municipal, Industrial, and Agricultural. ed. Hammer, D.A. Lewis Publishing, Inc, pp. 319-353.
    14.
  14. Calheiros António, O.S.S., Rangel, B., Paula, M.L., Castro, H.L., Cristina, S.C. 2009. Treatment of industrial wastewater with two-stage constructed wetlands planted with Typha latifolia and Phragmites australis, Bioresource Technology, 100: 3205-3213.
    15.
  15. Van Oostrom, A.J., Russell, J.M. 1992. Denitrification in constructed wastewater wetlands receiving high concentrations of nitrate, Water Science and Technology, 29(4): 7-14.
    16.
  16. Sobhanardakani, S., Ayatollahi, S., Ehteshami, M., Hossein-Shahi, D., Ghelmani, S.V., Salehi-Vaziri, A., Talebi, P. 2013. The efficiency of Typha Latifolica in subsurface flow constructed wetland for wastewater treatment. Journal of Health & Development, 1(4): 265-274. (In Persian)
    17.
  17. Ghaderi, A. 2004. Investigation of Wetland Plants Role as a Natural Treatment for the Urban Polluted Water in Tehran, With Artificial Canebrake. Geography and Development, 2(3): 107-120. (In Persian)
    18.
  18. Borghei, M., Nourbakhsh, S.M.R. 2002. Survey of industrial wastewater treatment of Isfahan Refinery using artificial wetland. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4(4): 15-24. (In Persian)
    19.
  19. Cheng, B., Hu, C.W., Zhao, Y.J. 2011. Effects of plants development and pollutant loading on performance of vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland, International Journal of Environmental Sciencd and Technology, 8(1): 177-186.
    20.
  20. Gersberg, R.M., Elkins, B.V., Lyon, S.R., Goldman, C.R. 1986. Role of aquatic plants in wastewater treatment by artificial wetlands, Water Research, 20(3): 363-368.
    21.
  21. Sobhanardakani, S.,Mehrabi, Z., Ehteshami, M. 2014.Effect of aquaculture farms wastewater on physicochemical parameters of Kabkian River, 2011-12. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 24(113): 140-149. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environment Federation (WEF). 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edition, Washington, D.C., USA, p. 541.
    23.
  23. Ehrampoosh, M.H., Karimi, B., Rahimi, S., Talebi, P., Ghalmani, S.V. 2007. Survey of removal efficiency of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) and organic matters from city of Yazd municipal wastewater in the first six months of the year 2008 using subsurface flow constructed wetland. Toloo-e- Behdasht, 6(3-4): 74-84. (In Persian)
    24.

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 

 

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]