Investigating the Effect of Explosive Welding Variables on the Corrosion Behavior of Explosive Joint of Two-Layered Inconel 718-AISI H13 Hot Work Tool Steel Plates in Salty Environment

Subject Areas : Journal of Environmental Friendly Materials

A. Norbakhsh ¹ , M. R. Khanzadeh GharahShiran ² , A. Saadat ³ , H. Bakhtiari ⁴

1 - Department of Materials Engineering, Bandarabbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandarabbas, Iran
2 - Center for Advanced Engineering Research, Majlesi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Esfahan, Iran
3 - Center for Advanced Engineering Research, Majlesi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Esfahan, Iran
4 - Department of Materials Engineering, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

Received: 2018-01-13 Accepted : 2018-06-20 Published : 2018-09-01

Keywords:

Abstract :

In this research, the corrosion behavior and microstructural changes in two-layered Inconel 718- AISI H13 steel plates after the explosive welding process was investigated. The results of polarization curves showed that by comparing the first series of samples (explosive charge 2 and standoff distance of 3 mm), the third series (explosive charge 1 and standoff distance of 3 mm), and the fifth series (explosive charge 3 and standoff distance of 3 mm), it can be found that by increasing the explosive charge and the reduction of concentration at the intersection, the corrosion current density has been reduced. The metallographic results show a wave- vortex-like intersection due to the increased thickness of the explosive charge. The results of hardness testing also showed that when approaching the intersection of joint, the hardness in both samples has been increased. The impedance test resultsfor the welded samples showed that the highest polarization resistance (9407 Ω cm2) was found for the fifth sample series (explosive charge 3 and standoff distance of 3 mm), followed by the second sample (8341 Ω cm2) (explosive charge 2 and standoff distance of 4 mm), and the lowest polarization resistance was seen in the third series sample.

References:

[1] M. Acarer and B. Demir, Mater. Lett., 62(2008), 4158.

[2] F. Fendik, Mater. Des., 32(2011), 1081.

[3] K. Raghukandan, J. Mater. Process. Technol.,139(2003), 573.

[4] S. Jun, T. Jie and G. Zhong, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 21(2011), 2175.

[5] M. Benak, M. Turna, M. Ozvold, P. Nesvadba, J. Lokaj, L. Caplovic, F. Kovac and V. Stoyka,19. Mezinárodní Konference Metalurgie a Material,Sborník Konference Metal, Roznov pod Radhostem Czech Republic, (2010), 235.

[6] S. Saravanan and K. Raghukandan, Mater. Manuf. Processes, 589(2013), 05.

[7] A. Khosravifard and R. Ebrahimi, Mater. Des., 31(2010), 493.

[8] U. Kamachi Mudali, B. M. Ananda Rao, K. Shanmugam, R. Natarajan and B. Raj, J. Nucl Mater., 321(2003), 40.

[9] H. R. Zareie Rajani, S. A. A. Akbari Mousavi and F. Madani Sani, Mater. Des., 43(2013), 467.

[10] M. Acarer, Elec. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 21(2012), 2375.

[11] N. Kahramana and F. Findik, Int. J. Impact Eng., 34(2007), 1423.

[12] R. hadi, S. A. A. Akbari musavi and H. Ebrahimi, Adv. Mater. Res., 829(2013), 36.

[13] Standard Guide for Reflected-Light Photomicrography, ASTM E88 3-11, Philadelphia, (2014).

[14] Standard Test Method for Conducting Potentiodynamic Polarization Resistance Measurements, ASTM G59 - 97, Philadelphia, (2014).

[15] Standard Practice for Verification of Algorithm and Equipment for Electrochemical Impedance Measurements, ASTM G106 - 89, Philadelphia, (2014).

[16] J. Verma, R. V. Taiwade, J. Manuf. Process., 24(2016), 1.

[17] R. G. De Paula, C. R. Araujo, F. C. Lins, J. R. G. Carneiro, Corros.Eng. Sci. Techn., 47(2012), 116.

[18] K. Srinivasa and K. Rao Prasad Rao, Trans. Indian Inst. Met., 57(2004), 593.

[19] H. Liqing, L. Guobiao, W. Zidong, Z. Hong, L. Feng and Y. Long, Rare. Metal Mat. Eng., 39(2010), 393.