بررسی میزان بکارگیری رسانه‌های نوین آموزشی؛ شناسایی مشکلات و موانع آنها از دیدگاه مسئولین و معلمان اداره‌ی آموزش و پرورش

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

علیرضا قاسمی زاد ¹ (استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد کازرون، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کازرون، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/09/30 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/09/30 تاریخ انتشار : 1394/09/01

کلید واژه: آموزش و پرورش, رسانه‌های نوین آموزشی, موانع و مشکلات بکارگیری,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف از انجام این تحقیق، بررسی میزان بکارگیری رسانه­های نوین آموزشی، شناسایی مشکلات و موانع آنها از دیدگاه مسئولین و معلمان اداره آموزش و پرورش شهر قائمیه بود. روش انجام این تحقیق توصیفی- پیمایشی و جامعه­ی آماری کلیه­ی مسئولین و معلمان اداره آموزش و پرورش قائمیه که 455 نفر بود. از کل جامعه­ی آماری تعداد 188نفر به روش نمونه­گیری تصادفی ساده انتخاب شدند. سپس پرسشنامه­ای حاوی 30 سؤال طراحی شد. روایی پرسشنامه با استفاده از نظر متخصصان و تحلیل گویه مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. آزمون «آلفای کرونباخ» پایایی آن راتأییدکرد (85/0=a). نتایج تحلیل داده­های تحقیق حاکی از اولویت بندی مؤلفه­ها و مشکلات بکارگیری رسانه­های آموزشی با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و آزمون فریدمن به ترتیب شامل: 1- برنامه­ریزی و محتوا، 2- سخت افزارو زیر ساخت­ها، 3- نیروی متخصص و آموزش، 4- مسائل مالی، 5- مدیریت و اضطراب فناوری، 6- زمان و تراکم دانش آموزی، 7- باورهای سنتی،
8- انگیزش است. با توجه به آزمون فرید من می­توان گفت که اولویت بندی مؤلفه­ها معنی­دار می­باشد به این معنی که عامل برنامه­ریزی و محتوا اولین اولویت و عامل انگیزش آخرین اولویت را دارا بودند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Educational technology Use plays a very effective role in educational development. The purpose of this study was to determine the problems and obstacles of modern media use from the perspectives of Ghaemiye Education organization staffs and teachers in charge. The research method was descriptive. 188 out of 455 teachers and educational Staffs were randomly selected through simple random sampling. The required data were collected by the researcher-made questionnaire. Validity and reliability of the questionnaire were established by expert judgment and Cronbach’s Alpha respectively. Planning content, Hardware, infrastructure, Expertise and training, Financial Issues, anxiety management technology, Compression time student, Traditional belief, and Motivation were the components which were extracted from the instrument through exploratory factor analysis. According to the Friedman test, it can be said that the value of the priority component is (X², 1073; df, 7; P<. 01). Therefore, planning and Motivation hat the highest and lowest priorities from the participants’ perspectives.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Abbaci,P.(1992).A Study of  How to Use Educational Aids by Esfahan High School Teachers. Journal of Education, No, 32.


2. Asemy,J.(1974).Inquiry into the uses of instructional technology.Tanslator,Movafaghiyan,N.Tehran:Franklin. Bakhshande,F.(1999).Introduction  to  the equipment and training facilities in schools.Tehran,Chogan.


3. Ghorchiyan,N.(2004).Curriculum based on interdisciplinary Science in  Educational system. Tehran: Faraandishe.


4. Gudanescu,S.(2010).New education technologies .Procedia Societal  and Behavioral Sciences 2    5646-5649.


5. Hajihoseinlo, Gh.(1999).A study of problems in using Educational Technology in Teaching And learning Possess from Point of View of Khoy Elementary Teachers. Unpublished Dissertation.I.A.U,Tehran Center Branch.


6. Peansupap, V. and Walker, D. (2005). Exploratory factors influencing information and communication technology and sdoption within Australian construction organization: A micro analysis. Construction Innoavation, 5, 135-157.


7. Rahimidost,GH.(2007).Compilation Educational Technology In Schools. Development And Educational Technology.No,3.


8. Rogers.F.(2005).Technology and Interactive Media  as Tools in Early  Childhood Programs  Serving children  from Birth through  Age National  Association  for the Education  of  Young Children .dc-4101.


9. Samari I, Atashak M.(2010). The Effect of Knowledge and Applying Educational Technology by Teachers in Improving Quality of Students Learning Process. Journal of technology in Education. ; 4 (2) :101-111.


10. Razavi,A.(2011).Modern issues in instructional technology. Ahvaz: Chamran University.

2. Amirtymoorie, ‎M. H. (2006). Teaching - Learning Media .Tehran: Savalan.

4. Asemi,A.(1998).Smart Schools. Journal of Efficient Schools.No,7,Page,29.


5. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 8(1).


6. Deylamaghani,M.(2003).Information Technology in Nations Educational Planning. Educational Technology Development.No,5.


7. Field, Andy.P (2005).Factor Analysis Rsing SPSS" Discovering statistic using SPSS (2^nd edititon). London: sage.

11. Hannafin.M.(2005).Educational Technology Research in Postsecondary settings : Promise Problems and Prospects. Journal of  Computing in Higher Education Spring  .Vol 16(2).3-22


12. Hemmatzade,N.(1992). The need to apply modern educational technology In Education and usage hinders in Iran. Journal of Educational Technology Groth,No,4.


13. Karimijashni,J.(1999).An analysis of High Schools Current and desired situation of Educational Equipment and Spaces in Fars Based on Second develop program indicators. Unpublished dissertation, Esfahan University.


14. Mashayekh,P.(1993).Study of Technology Usages  Inhibiting factors in Teaching and Learning Process From Point of View of Mazandaran Teachers.Unpublished Dissertation,Tarbiyat Moallem University.


15. McNaught, C. Philips, R. Rossiter, D.& Winn, J. (2000).Developing a framework for a useable and useful inventory of computer-facilitated learning and support materials in Australian universities.[ Evaluations and Investigations Program. Canberra: DETYA. Retrieved from.


16. Neyland, E. (2013). Integrating online learning in NSW secondary schools: Three schools perspectives on ICT adoption. Australia Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 152-17.

19. Rastegarpour,H and Abdollahi, N.(2005).ICT Development strategies. Tehran: Daneshe Mardom.


20. Ranai, M( 2006)Examining the effect of information and communication technology on the educational justice from the Tehran’s high school teachers point of view،procedia- social and behavioral sciences 47  19 -23.


21. Roberts, Cynthia. (2008) Implementing Educational Technology in Higher Education: A Strategic Approach. The Journal of Educators Online, Vol 5, No 1.

 

1. Sattari,S.(2010).Effective factors to Failure to use Visual educational  aids during teaching and learning from point of view of Mazandaran High School Teachers. Journal of ICT in Education,No,2,Page,6.


2. Shabani, H (2012). Instructional skills (methods and techniques of teaching). Tehran: SAMT.


3. Ghalehnoei,KH.(2000). Educational Technology A necessary to Educational System Development. Journal of Educational Technology Groth, No,5.


4. Sprtts, Thomas H. (1999). Discriminating factors in faculty use of instructional teachnology in higher sducation. Educational Technology & Society. Vol-4-99/spots.html P 69-90.


5. Tezar.M .(2009).During the process of technology integration teachers proficiency and infrastructural problems of using technology in primary schools of North Cyprus. ProcediaSocia and Behavioral Sciences 1 381-389


6. Tiamiyu, M. A. (2000). Information technology in Nigerian federal agencies: Problems, impacts and strategies. Journal of Information Science,26(4), 227-237.

31. Vasheghani Farahani,M.(1994).A Study of Educational Technology Usage Barriers in Teaching and Learning Possess From Point of View of Arak Guidance  Schools. Unpublished Dissertation, Tarbiyat Moallem University.


32. Wittich, W. A., & Schuller, C. F. (1979). Instructional technology, its nature and use.Translator,Etemad,E.Shiraz:Rahgosha.


33. Yosefi,Z.(1996).A Study of Application Educational Technology hinders in Teaching and Learning Process From Point of view of Shiraz New High School Teachers.Unpublished Dissertation,Tarbiyat Moallem University.