طراحی الگوی مدرسه داری مدیران برای پیشگیری از ابتلا به ویروس کرونا (کوید 19) به شیوه تحلیل مضمون
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش
1 - هئیت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد محلات
کلید واژه: مدیران مدارس, الگوی مدرسه مداری, پیشگیری از ابتلا به ویروس کرونای 2019,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف پژوهش حاضر، طراحی الگوی مدرسه داری مدیران مدارس برای پیشگیری از ابتلاء به ویروس کرونا(2019) بوده است. روش پژوهش، کیفی از نوع تحلیل مضمون بوده است. محیط پژوهش شامل همه 54 منبع مستخرج از بررسی های به عمل آمده در رابطه با راهبردهای مدیریت مدرسه و پیشگیری از شیوع بیمارهای تنفسی و ویروس کرونای 2019 بوده است. پایایی نتایج با استفاده از روش هولستی 90/0 برآورد گردید.برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از شبکه مضامین استفاده شده است. بطور کلی نتایج تحقیق نشان داد،الگوی مدرسه داری مدیران مدارس برای پیشگیری از ابتلا به ویروس کرونا(2019) دارای 5 مضمون فراگیر (ارتباط با مراکز بهداشتی، توانمندسازی روانشناختی ، راه اندازی شورای توسعه سلامت ، آموزش بهداشت و ایمن سازی مدرسه) و 14 مضمون سازمان دهنده ( ارتباط دوره ای با مراکز بهداشتی، ارتباط مقطعی با مراکز بهداشتی، ایجاد احساس با ارزش بودن، ایجاد احساس شایستگی، ایجاد احساس اثرگذاری ، ایجاد احساس خودمختاری، کنترل وضعیت جسمانی کارکنان، چک کردن بررسی وضعیت جسمی معلمان، چک کردن وضعیت جسمانی دانش آموزان، اطلاع رسانی با در دسترس قرار دادن بولتن، اطلاع رسانی از طریق نصب پوستر، اطلاع رسانی از طریق معلمان در حاشیه درس، بررسی راه های پیشگیری از ابتلا به ویروس کرونای 2019، بررسی راه های پیشگیری از بیماری های واگیردار) بوده است.
The purpose of this study was to design a schooling model for school principals to prevent coronary heart disease (COVID-19). The research method was qualitative content analysis. The research environment consisted of all 54 sources derived from surveys on school management strategies and prevention of respiratory illness and coronary artery disease 2019. The reliability of the results was estimated to be 0.90 by Holstei method. The data were analyzed using the thematic network. Overall, the results showed that school principals' schooling model for coronary artery disease (COVID-19) had 5 overarching themes (linking health centers, psychological empowerment, setting up a health development council, school health education and immunization) and 14 organizing themes (periodic communication with health centers, cross-sectional communication with health centers, creating a sense of worth, creating a sense of accomplishment, creating a sense of effectiveness, creating a sense of autonomy, controlling staff health, checking teachers' physical status, checking Students' physical condition, with information available Eden Bulletin, notification via posters, inform the teachers on the sidelines of course, the prevention of infection COVID-19, to investigate the prevention of infectious diseases, respectively).
Alhojailan, M. I. (2012). Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 39-47.
Ajzen,I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human. decision Processes, 50 (2), 176-211.
Alamri, F. A., Saeedi, M. Y., Mohamed, A., Barzanii, A., Aldayel, M., & Ibrahim, A. K. (2015). Knowledge, attitude, and practice of osteoporosis among Saudis: a community-based study. The Journal Of The Egyptian Public Health Association, 90(4), 171-177.
Almutairi, K. M., Al Helih, E. M., Moussa, M., Boshaiqah, A. E., Saleh Alajilan, A., Vinluan, J. M., & Almutairi, A. (2015). Awareness, attitudes, and practices related to coronavirus pandemic among public in Saudi Arabia. Family & community health, 38(4), 332-340.
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405.
Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 291–319.
Brian, A. & Haggard, S. (2003). Hygiene Promotion: Evidence and Practice. London: School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
CDC Officials Warn.(2020). Schools Should Prepare for Coronavirus Outbreaks, February 25, 2020
Coronavirus update: Schools and universities brace for impact amid global response
Debar, K.A. and et al. (2006). Review of current health education theory. Californian Journal of Health Promotion, 2(1), 74-87.
Ellison, S. (2003). Nurses attitude toward family presence during resuscitative efforts and invasive procedures. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 29 (6), 515-521
ENHPS (1997). Conference Resolution. First Conference of the European Network of Health Promoting Schools. WHO Regional office for Europe, Copenhagen.
Fereday, J. Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1): 80–92.
Gargano, L. M., Herbert, N. L., Painter, J. E., Sales, J. M., Vogt, T. M., Morfaw, C., ... & Hughes, J. M. (2014). Development, Theoretical Framework, and Outcome Evaluation from Implementation of a Parent and Teacher-Delivered Adolescent Intervention on Adolescent Vaccination. Health promotion practice, 15(4), 556.
Gellert, P., Bethke, N., & Seybold, J. (2019). School-based educational and on-site vaccination intervention among adolescents: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ open, 9(1), e025113.
Iudici, A. (2015). Health promotion in school: theory, practice and clinical implications. Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated.
IUHPE (2008). Achieving Health Promoting Schools: Guidelines for Promoting Health in Schools, 2nd ed., International Union for Health Promotion and Education, Geneva.
Maro. J. (2007). Adoption of internet banking: proposition and implementation of an integrated methodology approach. International Journal of Ban Marketing, 25(2), 72-88
Nationwide, S.(2020). Interim Guidance for Childcare Programs and K-12 Schools.
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD), Division of Viral Diseases. (2020). February 16.
Parcel, G. S., Simons‐Morton, B. G., O'Hara, N. M., Baranowski, T., Kolbe, L. J., & Bee, D. E. (1987). School promotion of healthful diet and exercise behavior: An integration of organizational change and social learning theory interventions. Journal of School Health, 57(4), 150-156.
Rowling, L. (1996). The adaptability of the health promoting schools concept: a case study from Australia. Health Education Research, 11(4), 519-526.
St Leger, L., Blanchard, C., Perry, M., & Young, I. (2010). Promoting Health in Schools: from Evidence to Action. France: International Union for Health Promotion and Education
Thompson, A. M., Wiedermann, W., Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2020). Effect of Daily Teacher Feedback on Subsequent Motivation and Mental Health Outcomes in Fifth Grade Students: a Person-Centered Analysis. Prevention Science, 1-11.
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management review, 15(4), 666-681.
Tobler, N. S., & Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of primary prevention, 18(1), 71-128.
Wang, E., Clymer, J., Davis-Hayes, C., & Buttenheim, A. (2014). Nonmedical exemptions from school immunization requirements: a systematic review. American journal of public health, 104(11), e62-e84.
World Health Organization. (2000). Improving health through schools : national and international strategies / compiled and edited by Isolde Birdthistle. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/66314
Wu, Z., & McGoogan, J. M. (2020). Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA.
_||_