ارتقای مدل مسوولیت اجتماعی برای آموزش در سازمان تأمین اجتماعی

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

داریوش بداغی ¹ , علیرضا اسلامبولچی ² , محمدرضا ربیعی مندجین ³

1 - هیات علمی دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد بروجرد
2 - مدیر گروه مدیریت دانشکده ی علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد همدان، همدان، ایران
3 - مدیریت دولتی، علوم انسانی، آزاد تهران، تهران، کشور

تاریخ دریافت : 1397/09/09 تاریخ پذیرش : 1399/04/01 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/04/01

کلید واژه: مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی, سازمان تأمین اجتماعی, تحلیل مضمون (تم),

چکیده مقاله :

مسوولیت اجتماعی به عنوان یکی از عناصر مهم وجودی سازمان شناخته شده است. به طوری که امروزه مسوولیت اجتماعی، موضوع حساسیت برانگیز و رو به توجه در سال های اخیر بوده است. به نحوی که رعایت آن توسط سازمان ها، رضایت ذی نفعان را برای مشروعیت، ارتقا و بقای سازمان به همراه دارد. مقاله حاضر با هدف پیشنهاد ارتقای مدل مسوولیت اجتماعی در سازمان تأمین اجتماعی انجام شده است. پژوهش برحسب هدف کاربردی توسعه ای و برحسب روش توصیفی و از شاخه اکتشافی است که از طریق تکنیک مضمون تم و دلفی انجام پذیرفته است. جامعه آماری پژوهش اعضای هیأت علمی دانشگاه، مدیران، کارشناسان و کارکنان سازمان تأمین اجتماعی بود که برای مصاحبه 31 نفر و برای پرسشنامه 16 نفر با استفاده از روش نمونه گیری غیراحتمالی، از نوع هدفمند انتخاب شدند. براساس یافته های پژوهش 6 بعد اساسی شامل بشردوستانه، اقتصادی، قانونی، اخلاق گرایی، عدالت اجتماعی و عدالت درمانی که بعد عدالت اجتماعی و عدالت درمانی برای اولین بار در ابعاد مسئولیت پذیری سازمانی اضافه و 33 شاخص است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Social responsibility is known as one of the essential elements involved in the organization's existence and it has become a sensitive and outstanding issue in recent years. Compliance with social responsibility by the organizations results in stakeholders' consent for the legitimacy, promotion and survival of the organization. The present article aims to propose the promotion of social responsibility model in social security organization. The research is developmental in terms of purpose and descriptive- exploratory in terms of method, which is conducted through the theme and Delphi technique. The statistical population of the study included university faculty members, managers, experts and employees of the Social Security Organization. 31 and 16 subjects were selected using targeted no probability sampling for interviewing and filling the questionnaire respectively. Based on the findings of the research, six major dimensions include humanitarian, economic, legal, ethical, social justice and health justice. The social justice and health justice are added to the corporate responsibility, which contain 33 indices.

منابع و مأخذ:

References

 

• الف) کتاب­ها:


• Alwani, S, M. 2005. Public Management. Twenty-Fourth Editions. Tehran: Publishing Nayer Ney. (In Persian)


• Azar, A. 2015. News age, The code is 65241. (In Persian)


• Shafi'i, R., and Ahmadi, K. 2013. Corporate Social Responsibility Concepts, Theories, Patterns, and Applications. Tehran: Samt. (In Persian)

 

• ب) مقاله­ها:


• Duff, A. 2016. Corporate social responsibility reporting in professional accounting firms. Journal the British accounting review. Vol 48, PP. 74-86.


• FaghaniMakrani, K., HeidariRostami, K., and Amin, V. 2016. Investigating the relationship between social responsibility and the risk of falling stock prices in companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange. Investment Knowledge Research Quarterly. Volume 5, Number 19, PP. 269-284. (In Persian)


• Habibi, N., Vazifehdust, H., and Jafari, P. 2016. Components of Social Responsibility Promotion of Islamic Azad University. Quarterly journal of research and planning in higher education. Volume 22. Number 2. PP. 125-145. (In Persian)


• HassanzadehDastjerdi, C. 2016. Providing a model for excellence in corporate social responsibility in the form of organizational excellence model. Oil Industry Social Responsibility Conference. P. 19. (In Persian)


• Khalily araghy, M., iaghinlo, M. 1383. Corporate social responsibility. Tadbir mahname. Vol, 144, PP. 64-74.


• Masoud, N. 2017. How to win the battle of ideas in corporate social responsibility: The international pyramid model of CSR. International Journal of corporate social responsibility. Vol, 10, PP. 1-22.


• Nikolova, V; Arsic, S. 2017. The stakeholder approach in corporate social responsibility. Engineering management. 3(1). 24-35.


• Park, E; Kim, K; Kwon, S. 2017. Corporate social responsibility as a determinant of consumer loyalty: An examination of ethical standard, satisfaction, and trust. Journal of Business research. Vol, 76, PP. 8-13.


• Pettrini, M. 2017. Sustainable development and corporate social responsibility: Abibliometric analysis of international scientific production. Journal services on demand. PP. 1-14.


• Qiu, R; Snaukat, A; Tharyan,K. 2016. Environmental and social disclosures" Link with corporate financial performance. The British a cloning review. No. 45, PP. 102-116.


• RabieeMandjin, M R., and Gholami, M. 2016. Investigating the Impact of Social Responsibility on Organizational Commitment. International Management and Accounting Conference. Seventh year . No. 3. P. 35. (In Persian)


• SalehiAmiri, R. 2011. Social responsibility of organizations. Research journal 61. Tehran: Expediency Council. Strategic Research Center. second edition. (In Persian)


• Salmani, Davood, Modarres, S., Nourian, K., and Salmani, A. 2015. Impact of employee judgments on programs related to organizational responsibility, on their attitudes and behaviors. Business Management. Volume 7, Number 2. PP. 259-278. (In Persian)


• Shafi'i, R., and Azizi, N. 2013. Study of the Organization's Social Responsibility Status in Higher Education Universities and Higher Education Centers of the West (Designing an Assessment Model). Quarterly Journal of Organizational Behavior. first year. Number 2. PP. 2-18. (In Persian)


• StaniSavljevi, C, M . 2017. Does customer loyalty defend on corporate social responsibility?  Original scientific paper, Vol 63, No. 1, PP. 38-46.