پیشبینی صمیمیت زناشویی براساس ناگویی هیجانی، انعطافپذیری روانشناختی، انسجام روانی و خودشفقتی در افراد متأهل
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه تعالی مشاوره و روان درمانی
زهرا بردن
1
,
محمود میرزمانی
2
*
,
آزاده فرقدانی
3
1 - گروه روانشناسی، واحد ساوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ساوه، ایران.
2 - گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه پزشکی بقیه الله، تهران، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی ، دانشکده علوم انسانی ، واحد ساوه ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، ساوه، ایران.
کلید واژه: انعطافپذیری روانشناختی, انسجام روانی, خودشفقتی, صمیمیت زناشویی, ناگویی هیجانی.,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: هدف پژوهش حاضر پیشبینی صمیمیت زناشویی بر اساس ناگویی هیجانی، انعطافپذیری روانشناختی، انسجام روانی و خودشفقتی در افراد متأهل بود.
روش: این پژوهش به لحاظ روش توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر شامل زنان و مردان متأهل ساکن در شهرستان اسلامشهر بود که جهت گزینش نمونه پژوهش به روش نمونهگیری خوشهای مرحلهای 443 نفر به عنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل پرسشنامههای صمیمیت زناشویی (MINQ) (2001)، ناگویی هیجانی (TAS-20)(1997)، انعطافپذیری روانشناختی یا پذیرش عمل ((AAQ-II (2011)، پرسشنامه انسجام روانی (SOC-29) (1987) و فرم کوتاه مقیاس شفقت به خود (SCS-SF)( 2003) بود. به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها از آزمون همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون خطی چندگانه به روش همزمان استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داده است بین ناگویی هیجانی با صمیمیت زناشویی رابطه منفی و معنادار و بین انعطافپذیری روانشناختی، انسجام روانی و خودشفقتی با صمیمیت زناشویی رابطه مثبت و معنادار وجود دارد (01/0P<).
نتیجه‌گیری: این تحقیق نشان داد که، انعطافپذیری روانشناختی، انسجام روانی و خودشفقتی میتوانند صمیمیت زناشویی را افزایش و ناگویی هیجانی آن را کاهش میدهد. به طور خاص، بهبود ناگویی هیجانی، انعطافپذیری روانشناختی، انسجام روانی و خودشفقتی میتواند به افزایش صمیمیت زناشویی کمک کند.
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to predict marital intimacy based on emotional alexithymia, psychological flexibility, psychological cohesion, and self-compassion in married individuals. This study was descriptive and correlational in terms of method.
Methodology: This study was descriptive and correlational in terms of method. The statistical population of the present study included married men and women living in the city of Eslamshahr, and 443 people were selected as the research sample using the staged cluster sampling method.The research tools included the Marital Intimacy Questionnaire (MINQ) (2001), Emotional Aphasia (TAS-20) (1997), Psychological Flexibility or Acceptance of Action (AAQ-II (2011), Psychological Cohesion Questionnaire (SOC-29) (1987), and the Short Form of Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-SF) (2003). In order to analyze the data, Pearson correlation test and multiple linear regression were used simultaneously.
Findings: The results showed that there was a negative and significant relationship between emotional aphasia and marital intimacy, and between psychological flexibility, emotional cohesion, and self-compassion with Marital intimacy has a positive and significant relationship (P<0.01). Also, the results of regression analysis showed that emotional alexithymia, psychological flexibility, psychological coherence and self-compassion explain a total of 0.77% of marital intimacy.
Conclusion: This study showed that psychological flexibility, psychological coherence, and self-compassion can increase marital intimacy and alexithymia reduces it. Specifically, improving alexithymia, psychological flexibility, psychological coherence, and self-compassion can help increase marital intimacy.
Abasi, E., Fti, L., Molodi, R., & Zarabi, H. (2012). Psychometric properties of Persian version of acceptance and action questionnaire–II. Psychological Models and Methods, 3(10/Winter 2013), 65-80. [in Persian] [Link]
Alipour, A., & Sharif, N. (2012). Validity and reliability of the Sense of Coherence (SOC) questionnaire in university students. Pajoohandeh Journal, 17(1), 50-56. [in Persian] [Link]
Antonovsky, A. (2002). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. In The health psychology reader (pp. 127-139). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Bagarozzi, D. A. (2014). Enhancing intimacy in marriage: A clinician's guide. routledge. [Link]
Barak, T., Levkovich, I., & Ayalon, L. (2024). Relationship intimacy in older couples when one partner has mild cognitive impairment: A qualitative study. Family Relations, 73(4), 2730-2744. [Link]
Besharat, M. A. (2008). Assessing reliability and validity of the Farsi version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale in a sample of substance-using patients. Psychol Rep, 102(1), 259-270. [in Persian] [Link]
Bizzi, F., Riva, A., Borelli, J. L., Charpentier‐Mora, S., Bomba, M., Cavanna, D., & Nacinovich, R. (2022). The Italian version of the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Validity within a sample of adolescents and associations with psychological problems and alexithymia. Journal of clinical psychology, 78(4), 503-516. [Link]
Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior therapy, 42(4), 676-688. [Link]
Costa, E. C., Castanheira, E., Moreira, L., Correia, P., Ribeiro, D., & Graça Pereira, M. (2020). Predictors of emotional distress in pregnant women: the mediating role of relationship intimacy. Journal of Mental Health, 29(2), 152-160. [Link]
Dawson, S. J., Fitzpatrick, E. T., Farm, G. H.-J., & Rosen, N. O. (2023). Self-compassion and compassionate love are positively associated with sexual and relational well-being among expectant and new parent couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(8), 3393-3404. [Link]
Du, X., Chaiviboontham, S., & Sumdaengrit, B. (2024). The experiences of Chinese colorectal cancer survivors in marital intimacy after ostomy creation: A qualitative study. Belitung Nursing Journal, 10(2), 222. [Link]
Elbayouthi, S. A. (2018). Marital Compatibility of the Working Family University of Benghazi.
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage publications limited [Link].
Filipović, S., Vukosavljević-Gvozden, T., & Opačić, G. (2016). Irrational beliefs, dysfunctional emotions, and marital adjustment: A structural model. Journal of Family Issues, 37(16), 2333-2350. [Link]
Imani, Z., Zanganeh, M. F., & Abbasi, M. (2022). The Mediating role of Psychological Cohesion in the Relationship between Psychological Suffering and Spiritual Adjustment to Marital Turmoil in Mothers of Children with Autism. Journal of Islamic Life Style, 6(1), 163-172. [in Persian] [Link]
Iordachescu, D. A., Gica, C., Vladislav, E. O., Panaitescu, A. M., Peltecu, G., Furtuna, M. E., & Gica, N. (2021). Emotional disorders, marital adaptation and the moderating role of social support for couples under treatment for infertility. Ginekologia polska, 92(2), 98-104. [Link]
Irandoust, R., Sohrabi, F., Maliholzakerini, S., & Ahi, G. (2019). The Casual Model of Relationship between Alexithymia and Female Sexual Function by Mediating Rule of Psychological Distress and Marital Intimacy. Journal of Family Research, 14(4), 515-531. [in Persian] [Link]
Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Raushan, M. R. (2022). Marriage without meaningful consent and compromised agency in married life: Evidence from married girls in Jharkhand, India. Journal of Adolescent Health, 70(3), S78-S85. [Link]
Kamomoe, P. K., Ngari, S. M., Gichure, P., Ndung’u, E. M., & Esiu, E. (2021). The effect of emotional intelligence on marital quality in Kenya: A case of the Catholic Archdiocese of Nairobi, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 2(2), 394-411. [Link]
Khamse, A., & Hoseyniyan, S. (2008). Gender differences between intimacy dimensions of married college students. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological, 6(1), 35-52. [in Persian] [Link]
Khani, F., & Aghaei, A. (2022). Comparison of Spiritual Wellbeing and Sense of Mental Coherence in Satisfied Couples and Couples with Conflict. Journal of Pizhūhish dar dīn va salāmat, 8(3), 93-108. [in Persian] [Link]
Körük, S., & Özabacı, N. (2023). How do early maladaptive schemas and family functions predict dyadic marital adjustment? A test on Turkish married individuals. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 49(7), 772-782. [Link]
Lassri, D., & Zamir, O. (2024). The role of self-compassion in the association between childhood maltreatment and marital quality: An actor–partner interdependence model. Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy. [Link]
Mackinnon, S. P., & Hill, T. G. (2024). Romantic Relationships, Intimacy, and Generativity. The Development of Generativity across Adulthood, 230. [Link]
Martino, G., Caputo, A., Schwarz, P., Bellone, F., Fries, W., Quattropani, M., & Vicario, C. (2020). Alexithymia and inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 1763. [Link]
Meyer, E. C., Frankfurt, S. B., Kimbrel, N. A., DeBeer, B. B., Gulliver, S. B., & Morrisette, S. B. (2018). The influence of mindfulness, self‐compassion, psychological flexibility, and posttraumatic stress disorder on disability and quality of life over time in war veterans. Journal of clinical psychology, 74(7), 1272-1280. [Link]
Miller-Mendes, M., Castilho, P., Clara, M. I., Clemente, V., & Gomes, A. A. (2023). Cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for insomnia: Exploring the potential benefit of psychological flexibility and self-compassion combined with behavioral strategies. New Ideas in Psychology, 69, 101013. [Link]
Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and identity, 2(3), 223-250. [Link]
Olson, D. (2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of marital and family therapy, 37(1), 64-80. [Link]
Pyszkowska, A. (2020). Personality predictors of self-compassion, ego-resiliency and psychological flexibility in the context of quality of life. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, 109932. [Link]
Pyszkowska, A., & Rönnlund, M. (2021). Psychological flexibility and self-compassion as predictors of well-being: Mediating role of a balanced time perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 671746. [Link]
Shafiei, M., Basharpour, S., & Heydari Rad, H. (2017). Comparing dysfunctional attitude and cognitive flexibility between women with and without a history of divorce. Scientific Research Quarterly of Woman and Culture, 8(30), 103-112. [in Persian] [Link]
shahbazi, M. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Persian version of the self-compassion rating scale-revised. Psychological Models and Methods, 6(19), 31-46. [in Persian] [Link]
Sierra-Swiech, R., Patrick, S., Britton, R., Tadros, E., & Can, A. (2024). Grace, self-compassion, and compassion: Influential factors in marital satisfaction. The Family Journal, 32(1), 48-55. [Link]
Tapp Jr, R. L. (2014). Concurrent relations between psychological flexibility and sexual satisfaction among committed couples. Spalding University. [Link]
Totenhagen, C. J., Li, X., Wilmarth, M. J., Archuleta, K. L., & Yorgason, J. B. (2024). Do couples who play together stay together? A longitudinal dyadic examination of shared leisure, financial distress, and relationship outcomes. Family process, 63(1), 210-227. [Link]
Villeneuve, L., Trudel, G., Dargis, L., Préville, M., Boyer, R., & Bégin, J. (2014). Marital functioning and psychological distress among older couples over an 18-month period. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40(3), 193-208. [Link]
Wang, Z., Goerlich, K. S., Luo, Y.-j., Xu, P., & Aleman, A. (2022). Social-specific impairment of negative emotion perception in alexithymia. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 17(4), 387-397. [Link]