شناسایی عوامل کاهش سوانح پرتویی در شرکتهای پرتونگاری با استفاده از روش داده بنیاد
سعید رازقی
1
(
گروه مدیریت، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران.
)
عقیل انصاری
2
(
گروه مهندسی ایمنی، بهداشت و محیط زیست، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران
)
مهناز زارعی
3
(
گروه مهندسی صنایع، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، ایران
)
کلید واژه: شناسایی, سوانح, پرتونگاری, ایمنی, گراندد تئوری.,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف تحقیق شناسایی عوامل کاهش سوانح پرتویی در شرکتهای پرتونگاری با استفاده از روش داده بنیاد در یک شرکت پرتونگاری فعال در عسلویه است. جامعه آماری پژوهش در این بخش شامل کارشناسان، متخصصان شرکت پرتونگاری روش نوین و اساتید دانشگاه میباشدکه تعداد متخصصان دانشگاهی 4 نفر و متخصصان و کارشناس در حوزه پرتونگاری 11 نفر بودند. از نمونهگیری هدفمند برای انتخاب افراد برای نمونه آماری استفاده گردید. با استفاده از روش Grounded Theory بصورت کدگذاری سه مرحلهای استفاده شد از این رو پژوهش حاضر کیفی است. ابزار تجزیه و تحلیل این پژوهش پرسشنامه ساختارنیافته بود. در یافتههای تحقیق به عنوان کد نهایی 93 کد استخراج شد. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد 5 مولفه و 25 زیر مولفه استخراجی با استفاده از کدگذاری محوری منجر به 5 بعد کلی می شود که این ابعاد نشانگر متغیر وابسته یا شناسایی عوامل کاهش سوانح پرتویی در شرکتهای پرتونگاری با استفاده از روش داده بنیاد در یک شرکت پرتونگاری فعال در عسلویه می‌باشد.
چکیده انگلیسی :
The aim of the research is to identify the factors that reduce radiation accidents in radiography companies using the data-based method in a radiography company active in Assaluyeh. The statistical population of the research in this section includes experts, specialists of the modern radiography company and university professors, of which 4 were university specialists and 11 were specialists and experts in the field of radiography. Purposive sampling was used to select individuals for the statistical sample. Grounded Theory was used as a three-stage coding method, therefore the present research is qualitative. The analysis tool of this research was an unstructured questionnaire. In the research findings, 93 codes were extracted as the final code. The research results showed that 5 components and 25 subcomponents extracted using axial coding lead to 5 general dimensions, which indicate the dependent variable or identify the factors that reduce radiation accidents in radiography companies using the data-based method in a radiography company active in Assaluyeh.
[1] Hosseini Pooya, Seyed Mehdi. (2019). Effectiveness of interventional measures on reducing abnormal radiation exposure in Iranian industrial radiography. Non-destructive Testing Technology, 2(4), 32-37. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/374214/fa. [in Persian].
[2] Zare, Arman and Shirazi, Hoda, (2017), Safety in Industrial Radiography in Preventing Accidents and Intervention, International Conference of HSE Experts in Oil, Gas, Petrochemical, Steel and Cement Industries and Civil Projects, Shiraz, https://civilica.com/doc/689515. [in Persian].
[3] Janžekovič, Helena. (2018). Five Major Mistakes in Industrial Radiography. 27th international conference nuclear energy for new Europe. https://arhiv.djs.si/proc/nene2018/htm/pdf/NENE2018_102.pdf
[4] Abd Razak, N.A., Othman, S.A., & A. Halim, A.M. (2023). Safety in Industrial Radiography: A Short Review. Emerging Advances in Integrated Technology.
[5] International Atomic Energy Agency. (1998). Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: International basic safety standards (IAEA Safety Series No. 115). Vienna: IAEA.
[6] Seyyed Javad Hosseini Aliabadi, Hamed Kasaei, Hossein Karimi Ashtiani, (2017). Investigation of effective factors in causing radiation accidents in industrial radiography activities, Journal of Radiation Measurement and Safety, 11(4), 101-106. magiran.com/p2607451. [in Persian].
[7] Bakr, Wafaa F. Root Cause Analysis Ofof Some Reported Radiological Events. (2017). International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 5(12), 7661-7672. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v5i12.13
[8] Stanislo vas Ziedelis and Marc Noel," Comparative analysis of nuclear event investigation methods, tools And techniques", Interim technical report, EUR 24757 EN – (2011).
[9] Council Directive of safety standards. (2014). Council Directive of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom, Official Journal of the European Union L-13 of 17/01/2014.
[10] Salem, El Sayeda Farid, "Risk analysis for overexposure measurements due to radiological accidents using computer code and the lessons learned "Meet Halfa as a case study ,Egypt", American journal of physics and application; 5 (2), 13- 19, 2017
[11] Bojorn Andersen and Tom Fagerhaug, "Root cause analysis simplified tools and techniques", second edition, ASQ Quality press, (2006).
[12] Kardan, Mohamad Reza, FereidounMianjiFereidounMianjiNRastkhahShow all 5 authorsS Borhan Azad. (2007). Promoting the safety performance of industrial radiography using a quantitative assessment system. Journal of Radiological Protection 26(4):429-35
[13] Ryan, Julie (5 January 2012). "Ionizing Radiation: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly". The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 132 (302): 985–993. doi:10.1038/jid.2011.411. PMC 3779131
[14] Herrera Ortiz AF, Fernández Beaujon LJ, García Villamizar SY, Fonseca López FF. Magnetic resonance versus computed tomography for the detection of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis due to testicular cancer: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Radiology Open.2021;8:100372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100372
[15] Schiffman, Richard (2013). "Two years on, America hasn't learned lessons of Fukushima nuclear disaster". The Guardian.
[16] Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Radiation Protection Office. (2022). Radiation Protection Guidelines. Tehran: AEOI.
[17] Gralla, Fabienne, Abson, David J., and Muller, Anders, P. et al. "Nuclear accidents call for transdisciplinary energy research", Sustainability Science, January 2015.
[18] Yablokov, Alexey V.; Nesterenko, Vassily B.; Nesterenko, Alexey (2009). Sherman-Nevinger, Jannette D. (ed.). Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment. Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing for the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. ISBN 978-1-57331-757-3. Retrieved 11 June 2016.
[19] Pandey, Alok; G. Sahani, P.K. Dash Sharma. (2023). Analysis of events reported from industrial radiation facilities. Elsevier Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings. 336(3). 38: 48-50.