تحلیل عوامل موثر معماری سازمانی در بهبود مدیریت زنجیره تامین با روش تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (مورد مطالعه : بهره برداری نفت و گاز)

محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت صنعتی

Ahmadreza Hosseinzadeh ¹ (دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت صنعتی علوم و تحقیقات تهران)
محمدابراهیم پورزرندی ² (استاد دانشگاه آزاد واحد تهران مرکز)
Mohammad Ali Afshar Kazemi ³ (Associate Professor.,Department of Industrial Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/02/13 تاریخ پذیرش : 1399/07/05 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/08/24

کلید واژه: معماری سازمانی, فناوری اطلاعات, زنجیره تامین, روش تجزیه و تحلیل سلسله مراتبی,

چکیده مقاله :

طی سال های اخیر با تغییرشرایط بازارهای جهانی، سازمان ها دریافته اند که برای رشد و بقا درمحیط پرتلاطم امروزی باید توجه خاصی به مقوله زنجیره تامین نمود. صنعت نفت جزء صنایعی محسوب می شوند که رعایت مسائل اجتماعی و زیست محیطی در آنها بشدت مورد تأکید قرار گرفته است. در این تحقیق، به منظور بهبود مدیریت زنجیره تامین، معیارهای اصلی، فرعی و نقش عوامل موثر معماری سازمانی، تعاملات موثر آنها بر یکدیگر را در راستای تحقق اهداف پژوهش شناسایی نموده ایم. این مقاله با بهره گیری از نظر کارشناسان و خبرگان و با استفاده از پرسشنامه و روش تجزیه و تحلیل سلسله مراتبی در فرآیند عملیات بهره برداری تولید نفت و گاز، صورت پذیرفته است که نتایج حاصل نشان می دهد، در معیارهای اصلی به ترتیب یکپارچگی، پاسخگویی، انعطاف پذیری و در معیارهای فرعی به ترتیب کاهش زمان تحویل، و مشترکآ یکپارچگی درون سازمانی و افزایش/ کاهش تولید، مشترکآ یکپارچگی برون سازمانی و برونسپاری، و سپس کاهش هزینه ها، بیشترین تاثیر را دارند. در بین گزینه های معماری سازمانی به ترتیب فرآیندکاری، فرآیند تصمیم گیری، ساختار سازمانی، و سپس تولید و توزیع اطلاعات، بیشترین تاثیر را دارند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

In recent years, with the changing conditions of global markets, organizations have realized that in order to grow and survive in today''s turbulent environment, special attention must be paid to the supply chain. The oil industry is one of the industries in which social and environmental issues have been strongly emphasized. In this study, in order to improve supply chain management, we have identified the main, sub-criteria and the role of effective factors in organizational architecture, their effective interactions with each other in order to achieve research objectives. This article has been done by using the opinion of experts and using a questionnaire and hierarchical analysis method in the process of oil and gas production operation, the results show that in the main criteria, respectively, integrity, accountability , Flexibility and sub-criteria of reducing delivery time, and jointly integrated within the organization and increase / decrease production, jointly external integration and outsourcing, and then reduce costs, respectively, have the greatest impact. Among the organizational architecture options, process work, decision process, organizational structure, and then production and distribution of information have the most impact, respectively.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Akavan Niaki, A. (2001). Comparison of methodologies for creating and developing information systems of Institute of Iran, Tehran: Institute of Iran.


2. Arab, A, Ghasemian Sahebi, I. and Alavi, S.A (2017). Assessing the Key Success Factors of Knowledge Management Adoption in Supply Chain”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(4).


3. Birasnav, M. and Bienstock, J. (2019). Supply chain integration, advanced manufacturing technology, and strategic leadership: an empirical study. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 130, 142-157.


4. Cash, Eccles, Nohira and Nolan. (1994). Building the Information –Age Organization: Structure, Control and Information Technologies. Chicago: Irwin.


5. Cerchione, C. and Esposito, E. (2016). A Systematic Review of Supply Chain Knowledge Management Research: State of the Art and Research Opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics.


6.  Daneshvar Kakhki, Mohammad, Hosseini, Seyed Reza. (2006). Application of           organizational architecture in the design of supply chain information systems, the Second       National Conference on Logistics and Supply Chain.


7.  Faizabadi, Javad. (2003). Introduction to Supply Chain Management. Tadbir Magazine,       (131), 47-54.


8.  G. Gupta, K. T. L. Tan, Y. S. Ee, and C. S. C. Phang. (2018). Resource-Based View of           Information Systems: Sustainable and Transient Competitive Advantage Perspectives.           Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22, 2018.


9. Ghadrdan, Akbar, Davari, Ali, Shahbazmoradi, Saeed, (2012).Evaluation of organizational   architecture of the National Iranian Oil Company from the perspective of human resource experts. Exploration and Production Monthly, 92, August 2012.


10.  Ghazanfari, Mehdi, Riazi, Afshin, Kazemi, Massoud, (2005). A Practical Guide to                  Organizational Architecture Planning. Tehran: Dibagaran Cultural and Artistic Institute.


11. Gosling J. Fu, J., Yu Gong, Brown, S. (2016). The role of supplychain leadership in the          learning of sustainable practice: Toward an integrated framework. Journal of Cleaner             Production,1-12


12.  Hong J, Zhang Y, Ding, M. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply   chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20, 35-08-3519.


13.  Jia, F., Blome, C., Sun, H., Yang, Y. and Zhi, B. (2020), “Towards an integrated conceptual   framework of supply chain finance: an information processing perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 18-30.


14.  Kalyar, M.N., Shafique, I. and Ahmad, B. (2019). Effect of innovativeness on supply chain   integration and performance. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15 (2), 362-386.


15. Laser, J. (2020). The best equilibrium in organizational flexibility-stability continuums.        International Journal of Organizational Analysis, doi: 10.1108/IJOA-09-2019-1875.


16. Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., Delgado, C. (2018). Enhancing supply chain performance              through supplier social sustainability: An emerging economy perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 259-272.
    
    
    1. Martinez-Sanchez, A. and Lahoz-Leo, F. (2018). Supply chain agility: a mediator for             absorptive  capacity. Baltic Journal of Management, 13 (2), 264-278
    
    
    2. Momeni, Mansour, Sharifi Salim, Alireza, (2012). Models and software for multi-criteria decision making, Tehran: Ganj Shaygan.
    
    
    3.  Mores, G.V., Finocchio, C.P.S., Barichello, R., Pedrozo, E.A. (2018). Sustainability and          innovation in the Brazilian supply chain of green plastic. Journal of Cleaner Production,         177, 12-18.
    
    
    4.  Moretto, A., Macchion, L., Lion, A., Caniato, F., Danese, P., & Vinelli, A. (2018). Designing a roadmap towards a sustainable supply chain: A focus on the fashion industry. Journal of cleaner production, 193, 169-184.
    
    
    5. N. Mayer, J. Aubert, E. Grandry, C. Feltus, E. Goettelmann, and R. Wieringa. (2018).An integrated conceptual model for information system security risk management supported by enterprise architecture anagement. Software & Systems Modeling, 1-28, 2018.
    
    
    6.  Nilipour Tabatabai, Akbar, Khayambashi, Bijan, Karbasian, Mehdi, Shariati, Mohammad. (2011).Optimizing the application of information technology in supply chain management and marketing of aviation products by AHP method. Journal of Modern Marketing Research, 2(5).
    
    
    7. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69: 96-104.
    
    
    8. O’brien, J. (2000). Management Information Technology in the Internet Worked Enterprise; New York: Mc Graw Hill.
    
    
    9. Panigrahi, S.S., Bahinipati, B., Jain, V. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management: A review of literature and implications for future research, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.
    
    
    10. PaulEric, D. and Merien, N. (2017). Modeling Supply Chain Performance”, 27th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, FAIM2017, 27-30 June 2017, Modena, Italy.
    
    
    11.  Pu, X., Wang, Z. and Chan, F.T.S. (2018). Leveraging open E-logistic standards to achieve ambidexterity in supply chain”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 6 (2),1-12.
    
    
    12.  Qayyum, M. N., Ali, M., Shazad, K. (2013). The Impact of Supply Chain Management           Practices on the Financial Performance of the Organization. International Journal of               Operations and Logistics Management, 2 (2), 22-40.
    
    
    13. Qronfelh, S. (2010). Alignment of information system with supply chain: impacts on supply chain performance and organizational performance. Degree in manufacturing management in the University of Toled.
    
    
    14. Rezghi Rostami, A., Hosseini, M., Asgari, E., Farshidi, A. (2017). The Role of Technological Innovation on Sustainable Supply Chain Performance Based on the Type of Company Activity. Journal of Engineering Decision, 2(5).
    
    
    15. Saifi Shojaee, Hamideh. (2017). Evaluation of Effective Factors on Improving Supply Chain     Performance Using Analytical Hierarchy Process in Food Industries, Biannual Journal of        Value Cahin Management, 1 (2), 1-16.
    
    
    16.  Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008).From a literature review to a conceptual framework for  sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (15), 1699-1710.
    
    
    17. Shahabi, E, Kordnaeij, A, Hosseini, S.H.K. and Azar, A (2017). Critical Success Factors in   the Supply Chain: An Adaptive Approach. International Journal of Applied Business and    Economic esearch, 15(5).
    
    
    18.  Shams, Fereydoun. (2004). Basic Concepts of Organizational Architecture.                          Communication and Information Technology Development and Use Monthly (Takfa)             Tadbir, Second Year, Issue 3, October 2004.
    
    
    19. Shokrman, J. (2007). The secret of survival in the forest of organizational architectural          frameworks; Create or select an organizational architecture framework. Translated by Dr. Yahya Eslami. Tehran: University Jihad Publications.
    
    
    20. Shukla, S.K. and Sharma, M.K. (2019). Managerial paradox toward flexibility: emergent views using thematic analysis of literature. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20 (4), 349-370.
        
        
        1. Srivastava, S. K. (2007).Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9 (1), 53-80.
        
        
        2. Tarafdar, M. and Qrunfleh, S. (2016). Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility. International Journal of Production Research, 55 (4), 1-14.
        
        
        3. Treville, Suzanne de and Shapiro, Roy D and Hameri, Ari-Pekka. (2004).From Supply Chain to Demand Chain:The Role of Lead Time Reduction in Improving Demand Chain Performance. Journal of Operation Management, 21, 613-627.
        
        
        4. Vafadar Asghari, Milad, Kurd, Baqer, Shahraki Moghadam, Iman. (2013). Investigating the Impact of Using Information Systems in Supply Chain Management. The First National Conference on Industrial Engineering and Sustainable Management.
        
        
        5. Van Grembergen, W. and De Haes, S. (2017). Introduction to IT governance and its mechanisms “minitrack. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 50^th HI International Conference on System Sciences.
        
        
        6. W. U. Hameed, M. F. Basheer, J. Iqbal, A. Anwar, and H. K. Ahmad. (2018). "Determinants of Firm’s open innovation performance and the role of R & D department: an empirical evidence from Malaysian ME’s. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 8(1), 29-42.
        
        
        7. Zuckerman, A. (1999). Aframework for Information System Architecture, IBM Systems Journal, 26 (3).
        
        
        8. Zuckerman, A. (2002). Supply chain management, Axford.Capstone publishing.