سطح‌بندی آسیبهای توسعه مدیریت دانش در دانشگاه‌ها
محورهای موضوعی : خطمشیگذاری عمومی در مدیریتموحد صادقیان 1 , محمد منتظری 2 , جعفر قهرمانی 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، واحد مرند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرند، ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
3 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد مرند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرند، ایران.
کلید واژه: مدل سه‌شاخگی, مدل‌سازی ساختاری– تفسیری, مدیریت دانش, آسیب‌شناسی,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه: مدیریت صحیح دانش باعث کسب مزیت رقابتی برای سازمان‌‌ها و در نهایت کسب موفقیت بیشتر و نهایتا تعالی سازمانی می‌شود. از اینرو بقای سازمان ها وابسته به مدیریت اثربخش دانش، است. هدف: هدف این پژوهش سطح بندی آسیبهای توسعه مدیریت دانش در دانشگاه‌ها در چهارچوب مدل سه شاخگی و رویکرد ساختاری تفسیری است تا از این طریق بتوان مدیریت دانش را در بهترین شکل ممکن توسعه داد . روش تحقیق: جامعه آماری کلیه متخصصان حوزه ی مدیریت آموزش عالی، اساتید و کارشناسان ستادی در دانشگاه‌های استان کرمان می باشند که با روش نمونه گیری هدفمند، 32 نفر نمونه پژوهش را تشکیل دادند. داده های پژوهش نیز از طریق مصاحبه های باز و نیمه ساخت یافته در بین گروه نمونه به دست آمدند. آسیبهای مدیریت دانش در چهارچوب مدل سه‌شاخگی شامل ابعاد رفتاری، محیطی و ساختاری مشخص شد. یافته‌ها: بر اساس نتایج تحلیل‌ها، اصلی ترین آسیبهای توسعه مدیریت دانش در بعد رفتاری عبارت اند از: ریسک پذیری پایین و عدم تعهد مدیران و کارکنان نسبت به مدیریت دانش، در بعد آسیبهای محیطی نبود نیاز و تقاضای مدیریت دانش از سوی جامعه و در بعد آسیبهای ساختاری عدم شفافیت و تسهیل گری مقررات و دستورالعمل‌ها و مبهم بودن مأموریت. همچنین نتایج بدست آمده نشان می دهد که اصلی ترین عوامل تاثیرپذیر در بعد آسیبهای رفتاری، عبارت اند از انگیزه و کار تیمی پایین و عدم رضایت شغلی کارکنان، در بعد آسیبهای محیطی نبود زمینه بها دادن به نظرات افراد در ایجاد تغییرات و در بعد آسیبهای ساختاری نامشخص بودن مأموریت و استراتژی‌‌ها در دانشگاه‌ها و عدم توجه به برنامه ریزی لازم در زمینه پیاده‌سازی. نتیجه‌گیری: مهمترین دست آورد پژوهش این است که به منظور رفع آسیبهای توسعه مدیریت دانش لازم است تا در بعد رفتاری ریسک پذیری پایین و عدم تعهد مدیران وکارکنان نسبت به مدیریت دانش به عنوان تاثیرگذارترین عامل مورد توجه دست اندرکاران قرار گیرد.
Background: Proper knowledge management leads to competitive advantage for organizations and ultimately more success and ultimately organizational excellence. The survival of organizations depends on the effective management of knowledge, as. The purpose of this research is to stratify the damages of knowledge management development in universities in the framework of the three dimensional model and interpretive structural approach, so that knowledge management can be developed in the best possible way. Methods: Statistical population of all higher education management specialists, professors and staff experts in There are universities in Kerman province that with purposeful sampling method, 32 people formed the research sample. Research data were also obtained through open and semi-structured interviews among the sample group. The disadvantages of knowledge management were identified in the framework of the three dimensional model, including behavioral, environmental and structural dimensions. Result: Accordingly, the main harms of the behavioral harms are: "low risk-taking and lack of commitment of managers and employees to knowledge management", in the dimension of environmental harms, "lack of need and demand for knowledge management by society" and in the dimension of Structural disadvantages "Lack of transparency and facilitation of rules and instructions and ambiguity of mission". The main influential factors in the dimension of behavioral injuries are "low motivation and teamwork and job dissatisfaction of employees", in the dimension of environmental injuries, "combating people's opinions in making changes and isolating experts and scientists". And in the dimension of structural damage, "the ambiguity of missions and strategies in universities and the lack of attention to the necessary planning in the field of implementation". Conclusion: so The most important achievement of the research is that in order to remove the damage of knowledge management development, it is necessary to pay attention to the behavioral dimension of "low risk tolerance and lack of commitment of managers and employees towards knowledge management" as the most influential factor.
_||_
Abdullah, R., Selamat, M. H., Jaafar, A., Abdullah, S., & Sura, S., (2008). An empirical study of knowledge management system implementation in public higher learning institution, IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 8(1).
Adhikari, D.R., (2010). Knowledge management in academic institutions. International Journal of Educational Management,
Adineh Ghahremani, A., Hashempour, L., Atapour, H, (2010). Study of knowledge management infrastructure in Tabriz University from the perspective of faculty members. Journal of Academic Library and Information Scienc, 45(57): p. 63-75. [in persian]
Afkhami Ardakani, M., Rajabpour, Ebrahim, Hashemi, Mehdi, (2015). Presenting a model to explain organizational silence using interpretive structural modeling. Quarterly Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies, Fourth year (3): p. 21-43 [in persian]
Alderfer, P.C., (2016). Identifying the in-service training needs of the social studies teachers within the context of lifelong learning. Professional Psychology, 13(4): p. 625-634.
Armaghan, N. and J. Renaud, (2017). Evaluation of knowledge management in an organisation. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 16(01): p. 1750006. [in persian]
Azar, a., mortazavi, l., abbasi, M.A., (2017). Acquisition of tacit knowledge in knowledge management with using of the repertory grid method (Case Study: Exploring and explaining key success factors in Supply Chain Management from the perspective of industry Zen Experts). The Quarterly Journal of Public Policy in Management. 8(28). [in persian]
Bromand Kakhaki, A.R., N. Akhavab, A. Mostofi, M. (2000). Provide a model for the future development of the knowledge management foundation; Case study in National Petrochemical Company. Journal of Innovation Management, 3(7).
Darvishi, D. and H. Darvishi, (2019). Assessing the effectiveness of knowledge management using Analytic Network Process. International Journal of Applied Operational Research-An Open Access Journal, 9(1): p. 31-40. [in persian]
Farhangi, A.A.R.C., (2000). Project to study and recognize the current situation of Kerman Regional Water Company, provide research priorities to solve some of the problems of the organization and increase productivityUser. Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, [in persian]
Fábio, C. and D.B.F. Carvalho, (2020). Holistic knowledge management: adherence analysis of the Castillo and Cazarini model. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(4).
Fathollahi, B., Afshar Zanjani, Ebrahim, and Nozari, Damoun, (2009). Is the University of Isfahan ready to implement knowledge management? National Studies in Library and Information Organization, 21(3): p. 6-20. [in persian]
Gorbanizadeh ASL. V.A. Zarandi, A.s.A.A., (2016). Apple studies of knowledge management of the organization using the model of reliable systems studied: Alborz Province Industry, Mining and Trade Organization. Human resource studies, 1(6) [in persian]
Haitao, Z., et al. (2020). Research on the Construction of Pathological Knowledge Management System Based on Web. In Proceedings of the 2020 the 2nd World Symposium on Software Engineering.
Hassanzadeh, M., Knowledge Management: Concepts and Infrastructures. Tehran, 2007. Librarian. [in persian]
Helalian motlagg, F., Hassanzadeh, Mohammad, Zandian, Fatemeh, (2017). Analysis of the mediating effects of knowledge management components in improving human resource performance. Data management, 3(2): p. 1-29.
Hemmati, M., (2009). Evaluating the application of knowledge management components in the faculties of Tehran Technical Campus. 4th National Conference on Knowledge Management, Tehran (Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Information Institute).[in persian]
Holsapple, C.W. and K.D. Joshi, a (2004). Formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources, and influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(7): p. 593-612.
Hoseini Damiri. S., (2016). Pathology of knowledge management development. International Conference on Management and Accounting. Tehran, Nikan Institute of Higher Education, [in persian]
Khanifer, H., (2007). Presenting a native management model based on the view of Imam Ali (AS) using a three-pronged conceptual model. Organizational culture management. 2(8). [in persian]
Khayat moghadam, s., Taheri Lari, M., oliaee, l., (2017). Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing within Supply Chain (Case Study: Khorasan Electricity Supply Chain). The Quarterly Journal of Public Policy in Management. 8(28). [in persian]
Marquardt, M.J., (2002). Building the learning organization: Mastering the 5 elements for corporate learning. Nicholas brealey publishing.
Mirzaei Ahranjani, H., (1997). Analysis of factors affecting work ethic in the organization. Proceedings of the Second Session on the Study of Practical Ways of "Social Discipline", the Sovereignty of Work Conscience and Social Discipline. Tehran: Islamic Azad University Press. , [in persian]
Molavi, B.G.a., A., (2013). Develop a knowledge management strategy in a research-industrial laboratory using a dynamic approach. Innovation Management, 2(4) [in persian]
Najafi Zade, M. and S. Zahedi, (2016). Pathology of staff performance management system in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences using a triangular model. Quarterly Journal of Development and Transformation Management, 3(25). [in persian]
Nateghi, F., Norouzi, Abbas Ali, , (2011). Knowledge Management Infrastructures in Qom Islamic and State Azad University from the Perspective of Faculty Members. Scientific Journal of Education and Evaluation (Quarterly, 4(15): p. 129-149. [in persian]
Nowruzian, m., (2007). Application of knowledge management in the public sector. Tadbir Monthly, 8 (16): p. 24-29.[in persian]
Parham, S., (2010). Explain the challenges of implementing knowledge management and introduce a suitable model for implementation in Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. Master Thesis, and Department of Management,. Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences(Payame Noor University, Central Tehran) [in persian]
Paoloni, P., G. Modaffari, and G. Mattei, (2020). b.Knowledge resources in the university context: an overview of the literature. Journal of Intellectual Capital,
RazaviZadeh, M., (2010). Interpretive construction of the lived experience of school-building charities (Case study: Mashhad school-building charities). Rahbord Farhang. , 1(3). [in persian]
Sage A.P, Interpretive Structural Modeling: Methodology for large scale systems. New York, 1977. NY: McGraw-Hill
Seyyedzadeh, m., (2010). Functions of knowledge management in universities: A case study of Payame Noor University. Management and Planning in Educational Systems,, 3(5): p. 78-103. [in persian]
Shropshire, S., J.L. Semenza, and R. Koury, Knowledge management in practice in academic libraries. IFLA journal, 2020. 46(1): p. 25-33.
Slack, N.J.S., G. (2018). Diagnosis of organizational culture in public sector undertakings undergoing reforms. Public Organization Review, 18(3): p. 361-380.
Jitesh Thakkar, S.G.D., A.D. Gupta and Ravi Shankar, , (2007). Development of a balanced scorecard an integrated approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(1): p. 25-59.
Sadri, A., (2018). Establishment of knowledge management in Iranian universities. Research in Educational Systems, 12(43): p. 41-63. [in persian]
Tyndale, P., A (2002). Taxonomy of knowledge management software tools: origins and applications. Evaluation and program planning, 25(2): p. 183-190.
Thomsen, E.B. and T. Lumbye, (2013), How to Facilitate Knowledge Collaboration–Developing Next Practice, in Innovation through Knowledge Transfer 2012. Springer. P. 103-104.
Vashisth, R., R. Kumar, and A. Chandra, (2010). Barriers and facilitators to knowledge management: evidence from selected Indian universities. IUP Journal of Knowledge Management. 8(4).
Warfield, J.N., (1974). Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (1): p. 81-87.
Zamani, b.H., Qasem, Yarmohammadzadeh, Peyman, (2009). Infrastructure of knowledge management in the University of Isfahan based on the views of faculty members. Journal of Educational Sciences, Birjand University, First Year (2): p. 49-66. [in persian]