The effect of sufficient barrier layers on hydraulic fracturing design efficiency in one of the Iranian South hydrocarbon reservoirs

Subject Areas : Mineralogy

Behnam  Mousavi ¹ (Department of Geology, Fars Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fars, Iran)
Kouros  Yazdjerdi ² (Department of Geology, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran)
Mohammad  Abdideh ³ (Department of Petroleum Engineering, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Omidiyeh, Iran)
Hossein  Tabatabaei ⁴ (Department of Petroleum Engineering, Gachsaran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gachsaran, Iran)

Received: 2018-11-01 Accepted : 2019-08-07 Published : 2020-01-01

Keywords: mechanical earth model, fluid and proppant, hydraulic fracturing modelling, In situ stress, Bangestan Reservoir,

Abstract :

Hydraulic fracturing and matrix stimulation are two major methods of the reservoir stimulation. Hydraulic fracturing, which is the newest technique and technically more complex, is very useful in low permeability reservoirs. Although it has been used widely in hydrocarbon production wells, it is a new method in Iran. In this paper, the effect of sufficient barrier layers on hydraulic fracturing design efficiency was done for Bangestan reservoir (one of hydrocarbon reservoirs in south of Iran). To do this, at first, mechanical earth model (MEM) was developed. This model comprise of in situ stresses and physical properties of reservoir rock (like porosity and water saturation obtained from petrophysical well logs analysis) and determination of the rock fracture pressures and fracture propagation. Then, zone 5 and Sarvak zone of Bangestan reservoir were selected as candidate layers for hydraulic fracturing modelling. Finally, hydraulic fracture was designed for selected layers. In this design, the created fracture length in zone 5 is very shorter than the created fracture length in Sarvak zone. The results show that hydraulic fracturing can be done in Sarvak zone more successful than zone 5, which shows the importance of sufficient barrier layers in hydraulic fracture efficiency.

References:

1. Abdideh M, Ahmadifar A (2013) Prediction of geomechanical modeling and selection of suitable layer for hydraulicfracturing operation in oil reservoir (South West of Iran), European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 17(10):968–981.


2. Abdideh M, Fathabadi MR (2013) Analysis of stress field and determination of safe mud window in borehole drilling (case study: SW Iran), Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 3:105-110.


3. Al-Ajmi AM, Zimmerman RW (2006) Stability analysis of vertical boreholes using the Mogi–Coulomb failure criterion, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 43:1200–1211.


4. Ashoori S, Abdideh M, Yahagh M (2014) Investigation of hydraulic fracturing operation and fracture propagation simulation in reservoir rock, Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal 10:203-211.


5. Aslam T (2011) Review on hydraulic fracturing technique (MS Thesis). Dalhousie University, December.


6. Charlez PA (1997) Rock Mechanics Petroleum Applications, Technip Editions, Paris. Vol. 2 :292–297.


7. Economides MJ, Nolte KG (2002) Reservoir Stimulation, 3rd edition Wiley, New York.


8. Fjaer E, Holt RM, Horsrud P, Raaen AM, Risnes R (2008) Petroleum related rock mechanics, 2nd edition Elsevier, Amsterdam.


9. Guo B, Liu X, Tan X (2017) Petroleum production engineering, 2nd edition Elsevier, Amsterdam.


10. Hassebroek W, Waters A (1964) Advancements through 15 years of fracturing, Journal of Petroleum Technology 16(7):760–764.


11. Heydarabadi FR, Moghadasi J (2010) Hydraulic Fracturing in Iran-Lessons from Four Case Histories, SPE Production and Operations Conference and Exhibition, Tunis, Tunisia, Society of Petroleum Engineers.


12. Li L, Meng Q, Wang S, Li G, Tang TA (2013) Numerical investigation of the hydraulic fracturing behavior of conglomerate in Glutenite formation, Acta Geotechnica 47:110-119.


13. Mohaghegh SD, Popa A, Gaskari R, Wolhart S, Siegfreid R, Ameri S (2004) Determining in-situ stress profile from logs. SPE Annual technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, 26-29 September 2004, SPE 90070.


14. Queipo V, Verde AJ, Canelon J, Pintos S (2002) Efficient global optimization for hydraulic fracturing treatment design, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 35: 100-151.


15. Shahbazi K, Abdideh M, Hadipoor M (2017) Modelling hydraulic fracturing process in one of the Iranian southwest oil reservoirs, Applied Earth Science 126:3, 108-11.


16. Vonieff GW, Holditch SA (1992) An economic assessment of applying recent advances in fracturing technology to six tight gas formations. SPE Annual Technical Conference, Washington, DC, 4-7 October 1992, SPE 24888.


17. Zoback MD, Barton CA, Brudy M, Castillo DA, Finkbeiner T, Grollimund BR., Moos  DB, Peska P, Ward CD, Wiprut DJ (2003) Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 40: 1049–1076.