Constraints to Farmers Willingness to Pay for Private Irrigation Delivery in Nandom, Ghana
Subject Areas : Extension of SustainabilityYussif K 1 , Obeng K 2 , Hudu Zakaria 3
1 - University for Development Studies, Ghana
2 - University for Development Studies, Ghana
3 - FACS/UDS Post Office Box TL 1882 Tamale, Ghana
Keywords: Constraints, Private Irrigation, Small farmers,
Abstract :
The study investigated the constraints to farmers’ intention to pay for private irrigation in Nandom District, Ghana. Using a key informant interviews and semi-structured questionnaires, the study collected data from 236 farmers. Data was analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics. Kendall coefficient of concordance was used to determine the level of agreement among farmers in ranking of constraints. The study found financial constraint (low income) as the most important constraints to farmers’ readiness to pay for private irrigation. Other important constraints were lack of ready market for output, crop pest and diseases, unstable output price, costly private services, inadequate supply of complementary inputs and lack of credit services. We concluded that lack of ready market, unstable price for farm produce and lack of credit services jointly worsen farmer's finances and consequently constraint their ability to pay even under condition of perfect knowledge of the benefits that could accrue from the technology. This study recommends the implementation of the proposed private irrigation service but management of the service should incorporate an efficient value chain in the management of the service.
1) Ayoade A. R and Akintonde J. O. (2012). Constraints to Adoption of Agricultural Innovations among Women Farmers in Isokan Local Government Area, Osun State. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(8): 57-61.
2) Dao, A., Sanou, J., Gracen, V., and Danquah, E. Y. (2015). Indentifying farmers’ preferences and constraints to maize production in two agro‑ecological zones in Burkina Faso. Agriculture & Food Security, 4(13):1-7.
3) Fadare, O. A. Akerele, D. andToritseju, B. (2014). Factors Influencing Adoption Decisions Of Maize Farmers In Nigeria. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 2(3): 45-54.
4) Feder, G., Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33 (2): 255-298.
5) Kendall, M. G. and Babington, S. B. (1939). The problem of m rankings. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 10: 275–287.
6) Krejcie, R. V. and Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, (30): 607-610.
7) Legendre, P. (2010). Coefficient of concordance. Pp. 164-169 in: Encyclopedia of Research Design, Vol. 1. N. J. Salkind, ed. SAGE Publications, Inc., Los Angeles. SAGE Publications, Inc. All rights reserved.
8) Lipton, M., Litchfield, J., Blackman, R., De Zoysa, D., Qureshy, L and Waddington, H. (2003). Preliminary Review of the Impact of Irrigation on Poverty, With Special Emphasis on Asia. FAO Retrieved from www.fao.org on January 10, 2010.
9) Maxwell, S. and Bart, C. (1995). Beyond ranking: exploring relative preferences in P/RRA; In PLA Notes (1995), 22: 28–35, IIED London.
10) Namara, R. E., Horowitz, L., Nyamadi, B. and Barry, B. (2011). Irrigation Development in Ghana: Past Experiences, Emerging Opportunities, and Future Directions. GSSP Working Paper #27, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C.
11) Nandom District Assembly. (2014).The Composite Budget of the Nandom District Assembly for the 2014 Fiscal Year. Retrieved fromwww.mofep.gov.gh
12) Oster, E. and Thornton, R. (2009). Determinants of technology adoption: Private value and peer effects in menstrual cup take-up mimeo University of Chicago.
13) Rademacher-Schulz, C., and Mahama, E. S. (2012). Where the Rain Falls Project. Case Study: Ghana. Results from Nadowli District, Upper West Region. Report No. 3, Bonn United Nations University-Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS)
14) Shashekala, S. G., Shankaraiah, N., Sumathi, Ravikumar, P., Kavitha, V., and Govinda, G. V. (2012). Constraints of Small Farmers for Their Agricultural Development. International Journal of Science and Nature, 3(2): 442-446
15) Thuysbaert, B., Beaman, L., Karlan, D., and Udry, C. (2011). Capital constraints to technology adoption in African agriculture. Yale University and Innovations for Poverty Action April 27 2011, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTDEVIMPEVAINI/Resources/3998199-1285617002143/7430173-1311794476566/8074298- 1311794536164/Bram_ Thuysbaert_Thematic_Session_IIA_Theory_Evidence_New_Directions_capital.pdf