The Effect of Replacing Barley with Ground Date Seeds on the Performance of Growing Male Goats

Subject Areas : Camel

آی.اس. میلاد ^{1 *} , آ.اس.آ.ام. ال-زهاف ² , آی.آ. آزاگا ³

1 - Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, El-Bieda, Libya
2 - Department of Animal Production, Sebha Agricultural Research Centre, Libya
3 - Department of Animal Production, Sebha University, Sebha, Libya

Received: 2013-07-09 Accepted : 2013-08-31 Published : 2014-03-01

Keywords: date seeds, goat in Libya, growth trials, inconvenient feedstuff,

Abstract :

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of replacing barley with different levels of ground date seeds (GDS) in the diet (0, 15, 3o and 45%) on performance of local growing male goats. Sixteen local male kids (average live weight 16.1±1.41 kg) were allocated randomly to four treatments (4 animal/treatment). The trial consisted of a 14 day acclimatization period followed by a 60-day measurements. The chemical analysis revealed that the ground date seeds used in this study contain (%) 6.3, 8.7, 62.4, 49.5 and 3.7 of crude protein, crude fat, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and ash respectively. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the average daily gain (54.38, 56.67, 44.58 and 47.92 g) or total gain (3.28, 3.40, 2.68 and 2.88 kg) and also in the total intake (35.12, 28.53, 28.12, and 29.15 kg) or in the intake of the concentrate, although the hay intake was higher (P<0.05) for the control compared with other treatments (8.33, 5.82, 6.18 and 6.3) for 0, 30, 15, and 45% ground date seeds respectively. There was no significant (P>0.05) difference in feed conversion rates (11.09, 8.98, 12.24 and 11.50) between the treatments. Economic criteria indicated that increasing the levels of ground date seeds in the ration resulted in a decrease in the cost of total intake (12.08, 8.82, 7.48 and 6.57 LD) for 0, 15, 30, and 45% treatments respectively. It was shown that the net return was doubled with inclusion of 15, and 45% GDS when compared with control ration (8.2 and 7.8 vs. 4.3). It was observed that the relative economic efficiency was increased with increased ground date stone levels. The current study concluded that ground date seeds can be included in the ration of local growing goats up to 15% without any detrimental effect on performance. However, the economic benefit could be obtained up to 45% ground date seeds.

References:

Abd El Rahman H.H., Abedo A.A., El Nomeary Y.A.A., Shukry M.M., Mohamed M.I. and Zaki M.S. (2012). Response of replacement of yellow corn with cull dates as a source of energy on productive performance of goat kids. Life Sci. J. 9(4), 2250-2255.
Abo EL Nor S.A.H., EL Sayed H.M. and Kholif A.M. (1995). Date seeds as a new component in diets for dairy animals 2. In vitro and in vivo digestibility studies by goats. EgyptianJ. DairySci. 23, 167-176.
Akraim F. (2012). Goat production in Libya: current state and production constraints. Krmiva. 6, 189-194.
AL Masri M.R. (2005). Nutritive value of some agricultural wastes as affected by relatively low gamma irradiation level and chemicaltreatments. Biores. Technol. 96, 1737-1741.
Al Owaimer A.N., El Waziry A.M., Koohmaraie M. and Zahran S.M. (2011). The use ground date pits and Atriplex halimus as an alternative feed for sheep. Australian J. Basic. Appl. Sci. 5(5), 1154-1161.
AOAC. (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. Vol. I. 15^th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.
Awadalla I.M., Maareck Y.A., Mohamed M.I. and Farghaly M.S. (2002). Response to partial replacement of yellow corn in Rahmani lambs rations with ground date seeds on growth rate, digestion coefficients, rumen fermentation and carcass traits. Egyptian J. Nutr. Feeds. 5, 139-154.
Besbes S., Blecker C., Deroannem C., Drira N. And Attia H. (2004). Date seeds: chemical composition and characteristic profiles of the lipid fraction. Food Chem. 84, 577-584.
Cheeke P.R., Potton N.M. and Tempelton G.S. (1982). Rabbit Production. Int. Brint. Publ. Danville, Il. USA.
Duncan D.B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometries. 11, 1-42.
Fayed A.M., Youssef K.M. and. Abou EL Naser H.M (2001). Nutritional performance of goats fed non-conventional diets based on Olive pulp in Sinai. Egyptian J. Nutr. Feed. 4, 81-89.
Goatcher W.D. and Church D.C. (970). Review of some nutritional aspects of the sense of taste.J. Anim. Sci. 31, 973-981.
Goering H.K. and Van Soest P.J. (1970). Forage fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagent, Procedures, and some application). U.S. Agricultural Research Service.
Haenlein G.F.W. (2001). Past, present and future perspectives of small ruminant dairy research. J. Dairy Sci. 84, 2097-2115.
Sallam S.M.A., Nasser M.E.A., EL Waziry A.M., Bueno I.C.S. and Abdalla A.L. (2007). Use of an in vitro rumen gas production technique to evaluate some ruminant feedstuffs. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 3, 34-41.
SAS Institute. (1996). SAS^®/STAT Software, Release 6.11. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Shawket S.M., Ahmed M.H. and Ibrahim M.A. (2010). Impact of feeding Atriplex halimus and Acacia saligna with different sources of energy on lamb performance. Egyptian J. Sheep Goat Sci. 5(1), 191-208.
Yousif O.M., Osama M.F. and Alhadrami G.A. (1996). Evaluation of date and date pits as dietary ingredients in tilapia (Oreochromis aureus) diets. Biores. Technol. 57, 81-85.