Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Immune Responses of Broiler Chickens Subjected to Sequential or Wet Feeding Programs Subsequent to Early Meal Feeding Regime

Subject Areas : Camel

م.  طغیانی ¹ (Department of Animal Science, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran /Young Researchers and EliteClub,KhorasganBranch,Is lamicAzadUniversity,Isfahan,Iran)
ع.ع.  قیصری ² (Isfahan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Isfahan, Iran)
س.ع.  تبعیدیان ³ (Department of Animal Science, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
غ.ر.  قلمکاری ⁴ (Department of Animal Science, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
م.  زمانی زاد ⁵ (Department of Animal Science, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
م.  محمدرضایی ⁶ (Young Researchers and Elite Club, Khorasgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)

Received: 2013-03-03 Accepted : 2013-07-01 Published : 2014-03-01

Keywords: Performance, Broiler, meal feeding, sequential feeding, wet feeding,

Abstract :

The current study was conducted to evaluate effects of sequential or wet feeding programs subsequent to and early meal feeding regime on performance, carcass characteristics and humoral immunity in broiler chicks. 192 Ross 308 chicks (seven-day old) were allocated to four treatments at four replicates (12 chicks per plot) based on a Completely Randomized Design. Treatments were included: control group (C) where birds had free access to feed throughout the experiment, meal fed groups (MF) where birds were meal fed from 7 to 14 d and subsequently meal fed by the control diet (MFC), meal fed a wet diet (MFW) or subjected to a sequential feeding program (MFS) until day 42. The results showed a statistical reduction of feed intake and increased feed conversion ratio during the meal feeding period (P<0.05). Consequently, meal fed chicks had a depressed body weight at 14 d, which was later, compensated (P<0.05). Following meal feeding, birds in the meal fed a wet diet (MFW) group exhibited the highest body weight, but the sequential fed group had significantly (P<0.05) lower feed intake, body weight andfeed conversion ratio(FCR) compared to the other groups. The highest relative weight of small intestine and the lowest abdominal fat pad percentage were observed in the MFS group (P<0.05). Birds' antibody responses to Newcastle, Influenza viruses and sheep red blood cell were not influenced by feeding regimes. It is concluded that feeding a wet diet following meal feeding programs can be effectively used in broiler chicken production.

References:

Bouvarel I., Barrier Guillot B., Larroude P., Boutten B., Leterrier C., Merlet F., Vilarino M., Roffidal L., Tesseraud S., Castaing J. and Picard M. (2004). Sequential feeding programs for broiler chickens: twenty-four- and forty-eight-hour cycles. Poult. Sci. 83, 49-60.
Bouvarel I., Chagneau A.M., Lescoat P., Tesseraud S. and Leterrier C. (2008). Forty eight hours cycle sequential feeding with diets varying in protein and energy contents: adaptation in broilers at different ages. Poult. Sci. 87, 196-203.
Camacho Fernandez D., Lopez C., Avila E. and Arce J. (2002). Evaluation of different dietary treatments to reduce ascites syndrome and their effects on corporal characteristics in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res.11, 164-174.
Cook M.E. (1991). Nutrition and immune response of the domestic fowl. CRC Crit. Rev. Poult. Biol. 3, 167-189.
Hangalapura B.N., Nieuwland M.G., De Vries Reilingh G., Buyse J., Van Den Brand H., Kemp B. and Parmentier H.K. (2005). Severe feed restriction enhances innate immunity but suppresses cellular immunity in chicken lines divergently selected for antibody responses. Poult. Sci. 84, 1520-1529.
Hocking P.M., Bernard R. and Robertson G.W. (2002). Effects of low dietary protein and different allocations of food during rearing and restricted feeding after peak rate of lay on egg production, fertility and hatchability in female broiler breeders. Br. Poult. Sci. 43, 94-103.
Khajavi M., Rahimi S., Hassan Z.M., Kamali M.A. and Mousavi T. (2003). Effect of feed restriction early in life on humoral and cellular immunity of two commercial broiler strains under heat stress conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 44, 490-497.
Khetani T.L., Nkukwana T.T., Chimonyo M. and Muchenje V. (2009). Effect of quantitative feed restriction on broiler performance. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 41, 379-384.
Kidd M.T. (2004). Nutritional modulation of immune function in broilers: review. Poult. Sci. 83, 650-657.
Leterrier C., Perrot P., Favreau F., Constantin P., Bouvarel I., Lessire M. and Picard M. (2006). Sequential feeding with lowand high-lysine diets increases activity and improves gait score in broiler chickens. Pp. 581-586 in Proc. 7^th Eur. Poult. Conf. World’s Poult. Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Liew P.K., Zulkifli I., Hair Bejo M., Omar A.R. and Israf D.A. (2003). Effects of early age feed restriction and heat conditioning on heat shock protein 70 expression, resistance to infectious bursal disease, and growth in male broiler chickens subjected to heat stress. Poult. Sci. 82, 1879-1885.
Lippens M., Room G., De Groote G. and Decuypere E. (2000). Early and temporary quantitative food restriction of broiler chickens. 1. Effects on performance characteristics, mortality and meat quality. Br. Poult. Sci. 41, 343-354.
Mahmood S., Mehmood S., Ahmad F., Masood A. and Kausar R. (2007). Effects of feed restriction during starter phase on subsequent growth performance, dressing percentage, relative organ weights and immune response of broilers. Pakistan Vet. J. 27, 137-141.
Mohebodini H., Dastar B., Shams Sharg M. and Zerehdaran S.(2009). The comparison of early feed restriction and meal feeding on performance, carcass characteristics, and blood constituents of broiler chickens. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 8, 2069-2074.
Moore S.E., Goldblatt D., Bates C.J. and Prentice A.M. (2003). Impact of nutritional status on antibody responses to different vaccines in undernourished Gambian children. Act. Ped. 92, 170-176.
Nielsen B.L., Litherland M. and Nøddegaard F. (2003). Effect of qualitative and quantitative feed restriction on the activity of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 83, 309-323.
Ocak N. and Sivri F. (2008). Liver colorations as well as performance and digestive tract characteristics of broilers may change as influenced by stage and schedule of feed restriction. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 92, 546-553.
Oyawoye E.O. and Krueger W.F. (1990). Potential of chemical regulation of food intake and body weight of broiler breeder chicks. Br. Poult. Sci. 31, 735-742.
Ozkan S., Plavnik I. and Yahav S. (2006). Effects of early feed restriction on performance and ascites development in broiler chickens subsequently raised at low ambient temperature. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15, 9-19.
Payne C.J., Scott T.R., Dick J.W. and Glick B. (1990). Immunity to Pasteurella multocida in protein-deficient chickens. Poult. Sci. 69, 2134-2142.
Praharaj N.K., Reddy M.R., Raman Rao S.V., Shyamsunder G. and Reddy L.N. (1999). Energy by sire family interactions for growth, feed efficiency, immune competence in commercial broiler. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 63, 82-86.
Ross Broiler Manual. (2007). Available on: www.Aviagen.com.
Saffar A. and Khajali F. (2010). Application of meal feeding and skip-a-day feeding with or without probiotics for broiler chickens grown at high-altitude to prevent ascites mortality. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 5, 13-19.
SAS Institute. (2008). SAS^®/STAT Software, Release 9.2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
Scott T.A. (2002). Impact of wet feeding wheat-based diets with or without enzyme on broiler chick performance. Canadian J. Anim. Sci. 82, 409-417.
Susbilla J.P., Tarvid I., Gow C.B. and Frankel T.L. (2003). Quantitative feed restriction or meal-feeding of broiler chickens alters functional development of enzymes for protein digestion. Brazilian Poult. Sci. 44, 698-709.
Swennen Q., Janssens G.P., Decuypere E. and Buyse J. (2004). Effects of substitution between fat and protein on feed intake and its regulatory mechanisms in broiler chickens: energy and protein metabolism and diet induced thermogenesis. Poult. Sci. 83, 1997-2004.
Toghyani M., Toghyani M., Zamanizad M. and Shahryar H.A. (2011). Assessment of performance, immune responses, serum metabolites and prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chicks submitted to early age water restriction. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 43, 1183-1189.
Urdaneta Rincon M. and Leeson S. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative feed restriction on growth characteristics of male broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 81, 679-688.
Yalda A.Y. and Forbes J.M. (1996). Effects of food intake, soaking time, enzyme and corn flour additions on digestibility of the diet and performance of broilers given wet food. Brazilian Poult. Sci. 37, 797-807.
Yasar S. and Forbes J.M. (1998). Effect of wetting and enzyme supplementation of wheat-based foods on performance and gut responses of broiler chickens. Brazilian Poult. Sci. 38, 43-44.
Yasar S. and Forbes J.M. (2000). Enzyme supplementation of dry and wet wheat-based feeds for broiler chickens: performance and gut responses. Brazilian J. Nutr. 84, 297-307.
Zubair A.K. and Leeson S. (1994). Effect of varying periods of early nutrient restriction on growth compensation and carcass characteristics of male broilers. Poult. Sci. 73, 129-136.