A Survey on the Current Status of Mechanization of Paddy Cultivation in Iran: Case of Guilan Province

Subject Areas : Environmental policy and management

Saeed  Firouzi ¹ (Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran.)

Received: 2015-08-08 Accepted : 2015-08-08 Published : 2015-06-01

Keywords: Power, Rice, paddy, Mechanization index, Mechanization requirement,

Abstract :

This study investigated the status of mechanized power and self-propelled rice cultivation machinery in Guilan Province in northern Iran. The raw data was obtained from 2013 statistics of the Agricultural Jihad Organization of Guilan province. Power per unit of area, mechanization level, area per unit of self-propelled machinery, and mechanization requirement were calculated for eastern, western and central Guilan. The mean power per unit of area for eastern, western and central Guilan was 2.22, 2.07, and 3.09 hpha , respectively. The total mechanization requirements were determined to be 0%, 73.39%, 99.28%, and 52.47% for land preparation, transplanting, weeding, and harvesting operations, respectively. The area per self-propelled rice machinery was 111.38,3777.97, and 358.99ha for rice transplanter, weeder, and combine harvester, respectively. This indicates that there is insufficient mechanization for rice weeding and that there is an urgent need to increase the machinery available for this agronomic operation in the paddy fields of Guilan Province.

References:

1- Alizadeh, M.R. (2011). Field performance evaluation of mechanical weeders in the paddy field. Scientific Research and Essays 6(25), 5427-5434. http: //dx.doi.org/10.5897/ SRE11.1412

2- Almassi, M., Loveimi, N. & Kiani, S. (2006). Farm machinery management. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press, Mashhad, Iran, P. 282. (In Persian).

3- Ampratwum, D., Dorvlo, A. & Opara, L. (2004). Usage of tractors and field machinery in agriculture in Oman. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Journal of Scientific Research and Development. VI, 1-9.

4- Firouzi, S. (2014). An assessment of rice cultivation mechanization in Northern Iran (Langarud County in Guilan Province). International Journal of Biosciences, 5(3), 110-115. [DOI via Crossref]

5- Karale, D.S., Khambalkar, V.P., Bhende, S.M., Amale, S. & Wankhede, P. (2008). Energy economic of small farming crop production operations. World Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(4), 476-482.

6- Khambalkar,V.P. Jyoti, P., Sachin, K., Dipak, B. & Shilpa, D. (2010). Energy and economic evaluation of farm operations in crop production. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2(4), 191-200. [DOI via Crossref]

7- Lak, M.B. & Almassi, M. (2011). An analytical review of parameters and indices affecting decision making in agricultural mechanization. Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2(5), 140-146.

8- Loveimi, N. & Almassi, M. (2003). Investigation of the status of mechanization in north of Ahwaz county. Iran Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Water and Soil Sciences, 7(2), 227-239. (In Persian).

9- Manjunatha, M.V., Masthana Reddy, B.G., Shashidhar, S.D., & Joshi, V.R. (2009). Studies on the performance of self-propelled rice transplanter and its effect on crop yield. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science, 22(2), 385-387.

10- Paman, U., Inaba, S. & Uchida S. (2012). Power availability and requirements for small-scale rice farm operations: A case in Riau Province, Indonesia. American Journal of Agricultural Science Engineering and Technology, 1(2), 27-36.

11- Pateriya, R.N. & Datta, R.K. (2012). Design modifications of Mat Type Rice transplanter. International Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Research (IJATER), 2(6), 87-91.

12- Rahman, M.S., Monayem Miah, M.A., Moniruzzaman & Hossain, S. (2011). Impact of farm mechanization on labor use for wheat cultivation in Northern Bangladesh. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 21(3), 589-594.

13- Rasooli Sharabiani, V. & Ranjbar, I. (2008). Determination of the degree, level and capacity indices for agricultural mechanization in Sarab Region. Journal of Agricultural Science Technology, 10, 215-223.

14- Rasouli, F., Sadighi, H. & Minaei, S. (2010). Factors affecting agricultural mechanization: a case study on sunflower seed farms in Iran. Journal of Agricultural Science Technology, 11, 39-48.

15- Shahbazi, I. (1989). Agriculture advancement: the requirements of change and renewal of agriculture. [Translation.] Publication of Agriculture Dissemination Organization, Tehran, Iran. PP. 22-35. (In Persian)

16- Shahraki, J., Shahrakizad, A., Yaghoubi, M. & Esfandiari, M. (2012). A survey on the level of mechanization development in Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 8(4), 2267-2271.

17- Singh, G. (2006). Estimation of a mechanization index and its impact on production and economic actors a case studies in India. Biosystems Engineering, 93(1), 99–106. [DOI via Crossref]

18- Singh, G., Sharma, T.R. & Bockhop, C.W. (1985), Field performance evaluation of a manual rice transplanter. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 32, 259-268. [DOI via Crossref]

19- Yohanna, J.K., Fulani A.U. & Aka'ama, W. (2010). A survey of mechanization problems of the small scale (peasant) farmers in the Middle Belt of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3(2), 262-266.

20- Zangeneh, M., Omid, M. & Akram, A. (2010). Assessment of agricultural mechanization status of potato production by means of artificial neural network model. Australian Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(5), 372-377.