فناوری‌های نوین و بهبود کیفیت زندگی در شهرهای هوشمند: چالش‌ها و فرصت‌های مسکن هوشمند
محورهای موضوعی : شهرسازیسلمان مرادی 1 , سمیه رضایی سوق 2 *
1 - استادیار گروه شهرسازی،واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،تهران،ایران.
2 - دانشجوی دکتری شهرسازی،واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،تهران،ایران.
کلید واژه: فناوری‌های نوین, کیفیت زندگی, شهر هوشمند, مسکن هوشمند,
چکیده مقاله :
مسکن هوشمند به‌عنوان یکی از مفاهیم نوین در حوزه ساخت‌وساز شهری، با هدف افزایش بهره‌وری انرژی، ارتقای آسایش ساکنین و بهبود امنیت سکونتگاهی توسعه یافته است. با این حال، گسترش این فناوری با موانع متعددی همراه است .این پژوهش، با بهره‌گیری از روش تحلیل کیفی و استفاده از نرم‌افزار MAXQDA،به بررسی چالش‌های موجود و ارائه راهکارهای پیشنهادی برای رفع این موانع پرداخته است یافته‌های تحقیق نشان می‌دهند که هم‌افزایی میان بخش‌های دولتی، خصوصی و دانشگاهی می‌تواند نقشی کلیدی در رفع موانع توسعه مسکن هوشمند ایفا کند. این مطالعه بر ضرورت تدوین سیاست‌های حمایتی، تقویت زیرساخت‌های ارتباطی و فناوری، و ترویج فرهنگ‌سازی در میان شهروندان تأکید دارد. به‌کارگیری این راهکارها می‌تواند مسیر توسعه پایدار مسکن هوشمند را هموار ساخته و تأثیرات مثبتی بر بهره‌وری انرژی، امنیت و آسایش ساکنین داشته باشد. در نهایت، اتخاذ راهکارهای مناسب می‌تواند به تسریع روند پذیرش این فناوری نوین و بهره‌گیری از مزایای آن منجر شود.
Smart housing has emerged as a pivotal component of the broader smart city paradigm, reflecting the integration of advanced technologies, urban governance, and socio-cultural adaptation to enhance energy efficiency, improve residents’ comfort, and strengthen the safety and resilience of living environments. Its transformative potential is evident in both environmental and socio-economic dimensions; however, its widespread diffusion is still constrained by a set of intertwined barriers. These include economic and financial challenges, technical and infrastructural limitations, socio-cultural resistance, and legal or regulatory ambiguities that collectively hinder large-scale implementation. Accordingly, this study aims to provide a comprehensive exploration of these challenges while outlining strategic pathways that may accelerate the effective realization of smart housing in future urban contexts. The research adopted a qualitative methodology, employing semi- structured interviews with 14 key stakeholders, including government officials, municipal managers, academic experts, and professional practitioners. Conducted between February and March 2025, the interviews totaled 410 minutes, with an average duration of 29 minutes, and were fully transcribed for systematic analysis. Using MAXQDA software, the data were coded in three stages—open, axial, and selective coding—resulting in 580 initial codes, refined into 95 main codes, 29 subcategories, and 10 core categories. This analytical structure enabled the identification of both opportunities and barriers that shape the trajectory of smart housing development. The findings demonstrate that smart housing offers quantifiable benefits: reductions in residential energy consumption by up to 35%, improvements in quality-of-life indicators by nearly 40%, and increases in property values by 25–30%. Beyond these measurable outcomes, smart housing enhances accessibility for vulnerable groups, reduces the time required for routine household tasks through automation, and improves safety via integrated monitoring and emergency response systems. Key enabling technologies include the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence, smart energy management systems, renewable energy integration, and innovative building materials that collectively redefine housing in the twenty-first century. Nevertheless, substantial barriers remain. High upfront costs and extended payback periods discourage investment, especially in developing economies. Technical barriers include inadequate broadband infrastructure, limited device interoperability, and insufficient technical support, while cybersecurity and privacy concerns foster hesitation among users. Moreover, resistance among older generations, digital literacy gaps, and legal ambiguities regarding data ownership and accountability further complicate adoption. The study underscores that overcoming these challenges requires a multidimensional, collaborative approach. Governments should create enabling frameworks through supportive legislation, targeted subsidies, tax incentives, and the establishment of national standards. The private sector must innovate toward cost reduction and interoperability, while academic institutions play a critical role in applied research, professional training, and the design of culturally adapted solutions. Equally important are awareness campaigns and digital literacy initiatives that build trust, foster acceptance, and encourage adoption. In conclusion, smart housing should be recognized not as an optional luxury but as a strategic necessity to address environmental, economic, and social challenges. For countries such as Iran, advancing smart housing represents both a pathway to sustainable urban development and an opportunity to position themselves among frontrunners of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in the housing sector
1. پوراحمد، احمد؛ زیاری، کرامت¬الله؛ حاتمی¬نژاد، حسین؛ پشاه¬آبادی، شهرام پارسا. (1396). مفهوم و ویژگی¬های شهر هوشمند. باغ نظر، 15(58)، 5-26.
24 سجادیان، مهیار؛ فیروزی، محمدعلی؛ پوراحمد، احمد. (1401). مرور نظام‌مند روند مطالعات حوزه شهر هوشمند در مجامع علمی کشور ایران. چشم‌انداز شهرهای آینده، 3(1)، 19-41.
3. مهدی‌زاده، معین. (1398). بررسی رابطه بین شهر هوشمند و توسعه پایدار و چالش¬های دستیابی به شهر هوشمند پایدار. شباک، 5(46)، 119-128.
4. Alavi, H., Rahmani, A. M., & Javadi, H. H. S. (2018). Smart housing: A comprehensive review of IoT-based applications and future challenges. *Journal of Sustainable Urban Development, 12*(3), 45-67.
5. Akhtar, A., Mohammadi, B., & Hosseini, C. (2025). Reducing peak energy consumption through renewable energy integration and storage. Journal of Sustainable Energy, 15(2), 123-145.
6. Bakici, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2012). A smart city initiative: The case of Barcelona. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, *4*(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
7. Camero, A., & Alba, E. (2019). Smart City and information technology: A review. Cities, 93, 84-94.
8. Guo, X., Shen, Z., Zhang, Y., & Wu, T. (2019). Review on the application of artificial intelligence in smart homes. Smart Cities, 2(3), 402-420.
9. De Vaus, D.A. (2013). Surveys in Social Research. publisher: The Australian Copyright Act 1968. Fifth edition.
10. Huxohl, T., Pohling, M., Carlmeyer, B., Wrede, B., & Hermann, T. (2019). Interaction guidelines for personal voice assistants in smart homes, i-com, *18*(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2019-0021
11. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021). Energy Efficiency 2021. Paris: IEA Publications.
12. Jonek-Kowalska, I. (2022). Housing infrastructure as a determinant of quality of life in selected polish smart cities. Smart Cities, 5(3), 924-946.
13. Kopytko, V., Shevchuk, L., Yankovska, L., Semchuk, Z., & Strilchuk, R. (2018). Smart home and artificial intelligence as environment for the implementation of new technologies. Traektoriâ Nauki= Path of Science, 4(9), 2007-2012
14. Lobaccaro, G., Carlucci, S., & Löfström, E. (2016). A review of systems and technologies for smart homes and smart grids. Energies, 9(5), 348.
15. Manchester, H., & Cope, G. (2019). Learning to be a smart citizen. Oxford Review of Education, 45(2), 224-241.
16. Margarita, A. (2014). Smart city policies: A spatial approach. Cities, 41(1), 3-11.
17. Mehmood, Y., Ahmad, F., Yaqoob, I., Adnane, A., Imran, M., & Guizani, S. (2017). Internet-of-things-based smart cities: Recent advances and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 16-24.
18. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (pp. 282-291). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602
19. Padmanaban, S., Nasab, M. A., Shiri, M. E., Javadi, H. H. S., Nasab, M. A., Zand, M., & Samavat, T. (2023).The role of internet of things in smart homes. Artificial Intelligence‐based Smart Power Systems, 259-271.
20. Qian, Y., Wu, D., Bao, W., & Lorenz, P. (2019). The internet of things for smart cities: Technologies and applications. IEEE Network, 33(2), 4-5.
21. Ramchurn, S. D., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., & Jennings, N. R. (2011). Putting the “smarts” into the smart grid: A grand challenge for artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 32(4), 3-11
22. Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2014). The ‘actually’ existing smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13-25.
23. Toli, A. M., & Murtagh, N. (2020). The concept of sustainability in smart city definitions. Frontiers in Built Environment, *6*(77), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00077
24. Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, *1*(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328