تحلیل میزان اهمیت ابعاد حکمروایی خوب بر ارتقاء‌ ساختار مدیریتی شهرهای میانه‌اندام (مطالعه موردی: شهر میانه)

محورهای موضوعی : شهرهای پایدار

میثم عظیمی ¹ , کریم حسین زاده دلیر ² , علی آذر ³

1 - دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد مرند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرند، ایران.
2 - استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد مرند، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرند، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
3 - استادیار گروه شهرسازی و معماری، واحد مراغه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مراغه، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/08/26 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/02/30 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/04/01

کلید واژه: شهر میانه, مدیریت شهری, شهرهای میانی, حکمروایی خوب شهری, توسعه شهری,

چکیده مقاله :

زمینه و هدف: مطالعات شهری در ایران عمدتاً بر کلان‌شهرها متمرکز است و کمترین توجه به ساختار مدیریتی شهرهای میانی ​​معطوف است. در این مطالعه ضمن پرداخت به این شکاف، سیاست‌ها و شیوه‌های محرک رشد مدیریت شهری فراگیر، ایمن، انعطاف‌پذیر و پایدار در شهرهای میانه‌اندام بررسی می‌شود. روش بررسی: پژوهش از لحاظ هدف، از نوع کاربردی می باشد که به روش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و مبتنی بر مطالعات کتابخانه ای و بررسی های میدانی انجام گرفته است. حجم نمونه آماری با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری در دسترس، 30 نفر از اساتید و متخصصین مدیریت شهری با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند به انجام رسیده است. جهت تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار SPSS و مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری با رویکرد روش حداقل مربعات جزئی از نرم‌افزار Smart PLS جهت ارزیابی مدل مفهومی تحقیق استفاده شده است. یافته ها: تحلیل ضرایب مسیر مربوط به ۸ بعد مورد بررسی نشان می‌دهد که شاخص قانونمندی (745/0) بالاترین تأثیر و بعد از آن به ترتیب شاخص‌های مسئولیت‌پذیری (684/0)، مشارکت (661/0)، عدالت (641/0)، شفافیت (529/0)، کارایی و اثربخشی (429/0)، پاسخگویی (356/0)، و سپس اجماع محوری (317/0) کمترین تأثیر را بر ساختار مدیریت شهری دارد بحث و نتیجه گیری: نظام برنامه‌ریزی و ساختار مدیریت شهرهای میانی فاقد یک رویکرد منسجم و مشخص جهت ارائه چشم‌انداز آتی است که در درون انبوهی از بی‌برنامگی‌ها و ناکارآمدی‌ها گرفتار شده‌اند که با نهادینه کردن الگوی حکمروایی خوب شهری در نظام مدیریت و برنامه‌ریزی که حرکت به‌سوی مدیریت محلی است تا بتوانند در فرایندی پیوسته و ساختاری، آرام آرام به توسعه مطلوب دست یابند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Background and Objective: Urban studies in Iran are mainly focused on metropolitan areas and the least attention is paid to the management structure of middle cities. In this study, while addressing this gap, policies and practices that stimulate the growth of inclusive, safe, flexible and sustainable urban management in mid-sized cities are examined.Material and Methodology: The purpose of the research is applied, which is a descriptive-analytical method based on library studies and field studies. Statistical sample size using available sampling, 30 specialists with purposive sampling method was performed. SPSS software and structural equation modeling with partial least squares method were used to analyze the data. Smart PLS software was used to evaluate the conceptual model of the research. Findings: The analysis of path coefficients related to the 8 dimensions studied shows that the regularity index (0.745) has the highest impact, followed by the indicators of responsibility (0.684), participation (0.661), justice (0.641), transparency (0.529), efficiency. And effectiveness (0.429), accountability (0.356), and then pivotal consensus (0.317) have the least impact on urban management structure. Discussion and Conclusion: The planning system and management structure of middle cities lacks a coherent and clear approach to presenting the future perspective, which is caught in a multitude of unplanned and inefficient ones. Structurally, slowly achieve the desired development.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Asongu, S. A., Agboola, M. O., Alola, A. A., & Bekun, F. V. 2020, The criticality of growth, urbanization, electricity and fossil fuel consumption to environment sustainability in Africa. Science of the Total Environment, 712, 136376.


2. Rabbani, Taha;Meshkini, Abolfazl;Ruknuddin Eftekhari, Abdul Reza and Rafiyan, Mojtabi.Clarification of urban governance issues in the future scenarios of Tehran metropolis based on the approach of converting qualitative to quantitative scenarios.Stable City Quarterly, 2018, 2 (1), 45-62. (In Persian)


3. Liu, H. K., Hung, M. J., Tse, L. H., & Saggau, D. (2020) Strengthening urban community governance through geographical information systems and participation: An evaluation of my Google Map and service coordination. Australian Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp.182-200.


4. Bettencourt, L. M. 2020, Urban growth and the emergent statistics of cities. Science Advances, 6(34), eaat8812.


5. Hataminejad, Hossein;Bezrafken, Shahram and Arvin Mahmoud.Analysis of the role of good urban governance model in reducing the vulnerability of urban housing against earthquakes.Human settlement planning studies 2016, 12(3), 599-617. (In Persian)


6. Porio, E. 2014, Climate change vulnerability and adaptation in Metro Manila: Challenging governance and human security needs of urban poor communities. Asian Journal of Social Science, Vol. 42, No. 1-2, 75-102.


7. Arbabi Sabzevari, Azadeh and Qasimpour, Arash. An analysis of the state of good urban governance and its role in the management system of urban planning (case study: Ahvaz Municipality), New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting Quarterly, 1400, 5 (55), 18-42. (In Persian)


8. Korosteleva, E. A., & Flockhart, T. 2020, Resilience in EU and international institutions: Redefining local ownership in a new global governance agenda. Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 41, No. 2, 153-175.


9. Rezaei, Fereshte;Tavakalinia, Jamila and Sarafi, Muzaffar.Investigating the role of non-governmental organizations in the realization of good urban governance, a case study of Tehran metropolis.Scientific Journal of Geography and Planning, 1400, 25 (77), 113-130. (In Persian)


10. Cento Bull, A., & Jones, B. (2006). Governance and social capital in urban regeneration: A comparison between Bristol and Naples. Urban Studies, Vol. 43, No.4, pp. 767-786.


11. Taher Mousavi, Zahra and Qaradaghi, Rostam.Evaluation of the performance of the municipalities of East Azarbaijan province based on good governance indicators.Public policy making in management, 2019, 11 ((1) (37 series)), 27-38. (In Persian)


12. Ziari, Karmatullah;Yadalenia, Hajar and Yadalenia, Hossein.Analyzing the performance of urban management with an emphasis on good governance indicators from the perspective of citizens (case study: Sari city).Scientific-research research and urban planning, 2019, 11 (40), 1-16. (In Persian)


13. Toklania, Jamila;Iskanderpour, Majid and Barghamadi, Mojtabi).An introduction to good urban governance: necessities, requirements and challenges for its realization in Iran.Scientific and Research Quarterly of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 1391, 5(1), 135-152. (In Persian)


14. Sarafi, Mozafar and Nejati Naser.The multi-level governance of the metropolitan area in line with the new regionalism approach (case study: Mashhad metropolitan area).Hoyt Shahr, 2016, 11 (3), 27-39. (In Persian)


15. Shahidipour, Ruholah;stone, inspiration;Mazherian, Hamed;Karmi, Alireza and Jafari Shahrashtani, Ali.Identifying and prioritizing performance evaluation indicators of Tehran municipal areas using the fuzzy Delphi method.Urban and Regional Development Planning, 2019, 5 (15), 51-87. (In Persian)


16. Ahdanjad, Mohsen;Jafari, Mina and Jafari, Nasrin.Evaluation of the endogenous development of the central fabric of cities with emphasis on quality of life indicators;A case study of the central context of Zanjan city.Scientific-research research and urban planning, 2016, 8 (28), 1-20. (In Persian)


17. Ismailzadeh, Hassan and Hemmati, Mojtabi.Good governance, a solution to realizing a good city, Political-Economic Information Monthly, 2013, 26 (2), 102-15. (In Persian)


18. Van Dijk, M. P. 2008. Urban management and institutional change: An integrated approach to achieving ecological cities (No. IHS WP 16).


19. Firouzi, Mohammad Ali;Rural, Shahrivar;Kamlifar, Mohammad Javad and Maleki, Saeed.Recognizing and evaluating the impact of urban governance components from the perspective of knowledge management, a study in Tabriz metropolis.Journal of Geographical Survey of Space, 2019, 10 (37), 73-90. (In Persian)


20. Broccardo, L., Culasso, F., & Mauro, S. G. 2019, Smart city governance: exploring the institutional work of multiple actors towards collaboration. International Journal of Public Sector Management.


21. Lyall, C., & Tait, J. 2019. Beyond the limits to governance: new rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences. Research Policy, Vol. 48, No.5, 1128-1137.


22. Ismailzadeh, Hassan and Mohammad Hemti (2012) Good Governance, Good City Solution", Journal of Political-Economic Information, Volume 288, Number 2, 102-115. (In Persian)


23. Habibi, Dawood and Mahboubi, Sahar.Explaining the relationship between good urban governance and citizens' satisfaction with the performance of the municipality (case study: Dogonbadan city).Haft Hesar Environmental Studies, 2018, 8(30), 47-58. (In Persian)


24. Jafarifard, Jafar;Saberi, Hamid;Azani, Mehri and Khadim al-Hosseini, Ahmed.Analyzing the indicators of good urban governance (case study: Kohnuj city).Urban Social Geography, 2019, 7 (1), 273-291.Bettencourt, L. M, 2020, Urban growth and the emergent statistics of cities. Science Advances, 6(34), eaat8812. (In Persian)


25. Sheng, Y. K. 2010, Good urban governance in Southeast Asia. Environment and Urbanization Asia, Vol. 1, No. 2, 131-147.


26. Broccardo, L., Culasso, F., & Mauro, S. G. 2019, Smart city governance: exploring the institutional work of multiple actors towards collaboration. International Journal of Public Sector Management.


27. Yang, H. 2021, Holistic Governance: An Explanatory Framework, In: Urban Governance in Transition (pp. 57-95). Singapore: Springer. ‏


28. Joseph, J. 2013) Resilience as Embedded Neoliberalism: A Governmentality Approach. Resilience, Vol. 1, No. 1, 38-52.


29. Gani, A., & Duncan, R. 2007. Measuring Good Governance Using Time Series Data: Fiji Islands. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Vol. 12, No.3, 367-385. ‏


30. De Guimarães, J. C. F., Severo, E. A., Júnior, L. A. F., Da Costa, W. P. L. B., & Salmoria, F. T. (2020) Governance and quality of life in smart cities: Towards sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 25, No.3, pp.119-926.


31. De Oliveira, J. A. P., Doll, C. N., Balaban, O., Jiang, P., Dreyfus, M., Suwa, A., ..., & Dirgahayani, P. 2013, Green Economy and Governance in Cities: Assessing Good Governance in Key Urban Economic Processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 58,138-152. ‏


32. Marufnejad, Abbas and Khajovinia, Laleh.Evaluation and ranking of some governance components in urban areas east of Ahvaz metropolis from the point of view of citizens and experts using MABAC technique.Geography and Environmental Studies, 2019, 9 (34), 89-106. (In Persian)


33. Bhaduri, S. 2020, Unit-2 Urban Management and Management of Urban Services. New Delhi: Indira Gandhi National Open University. (In Persian)


34. Estévez-Mauriz, L., Fonseca, J. A., Forgaci, C., & Björling, N. 2017, The livability of spaces: Performance and/or resilience? Reflections on the effects of spatial heterogeneity in transport and energy systems and the implications on urban environmental quality. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 6, No.1, 1-8.


35. Tabibi, Seyyed Hamidreza;Rafiyan, Mojtaba;Majdi, Hamid and Ziari, Yusufali.The role of knowledge-based and innovative cities in urban and regional development.Danesh Shahr Sazi 2019, 4 (1), 19-32. (In Persian)


36. Warsi, Hamidreza, Hosseinikhah, Hossein, Ghasemi, Mohammadreza.Regional development planning based on the future research method of cross-effects analysis and bias scenario writing (Case study: Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad Province, human geography research, volume 52, summer 2019, number 2 (series 112). (In Persian)


37. Rashid, H. (2011) Interpreting flood disasters and flood hazard perceptions from newspaper discourse: Tale of two floods in the Red River valley, Manitoba, Canada. Applied Geography, Vol. 31, No.1, pp.35-45.


38. Bettencourt, L. M. 2020, Urban growth and the emergent statistics of cities. Science Advances, 6(34), eaat8812.


39. Moradichadgani, Dariush;Ghasemi, Masoud and Rast Qalam, Nilofar.Analysis of location-based problems in the city-region of Isfahan with the help of social network analysis method.Applied Research Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019. 20 (58), 181-198. (In Persian)


40. Iran Statistics Center, National Planning and Budget Organization, 2015. (In Persian)