پیش‌بینی رضایت زناشویی براساس طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه، حمایت اجتماعی و سبک‌های دلبستگی زوجین در زنان متأهل
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسی زوجین
آژین رستمی
1
,
محمد اسماعیل ابراهیمی
2
1 - گروه مشاوره خانواده ، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران، نویسنده مسئول Azhin.sna2020@gmail.com
2 - استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران
کلید واژه: حمایت اجتماعی, رضایت زناشویی, سبک‌های دلبستگی, طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده مقدمه: رضايت زناشويي، يك تجربه‌ي شخصي در ازدواج است كه تنها توسط خود فرد در پاسخ به ميزان لذت رابطه‌ي زناشويي قابل ارزيابي است و عوامل بسياري هستند كه در زندگي مشترك روي رضايت زناشويي تأثير مي‌گذارند و اين احساس نقش مهمي در ميزان كاركردهاي بهنجار خانواده ايفا مي‌كند لذا، مطالعه حاضر با هدف پیش‌بینی رضایت زناشویی براساس طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه، حمایت اجتماعی و سبک‌های دلبستگی زوجین در زنان متأهل شهر سنندج انجام شد. روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر یک پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی و جامعه‌ی آماری آن زنان متأهل و مراجعه کننده به مراکز خدمات مشاوره خانواده در شهر سنندج در نیمه سال 1400 با تعداد 440 نفر بودند که به روش نمونه‌گیری در تصادفی و بر اساس جدول نمونه گیری کرجسی و مورگان تعداد 205 نفر انتخاب و مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. متغیرهای تحقیق توسط پرسشنامه‌های رضایت زناشویی انریچ، طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه یانگ، حمایت اجتماعی شربورن و استوارت و سبک‌های دلبستگی کولینز و رید انجام شد. داده‌های بدست آمده با استفاده از آزمون‌های رگرسیون خطی چندگانه و آزمون ضریب همبستگی پیرسون با کمک نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخه 25 تجزیه و تحلیل شد. یافته‌ها: نتایج تحقیق نشان داد رضایت زناشویی براساس طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه، حمایت اجتماعی و سبک‌های دلبستگی زوجین در زنان متأهل شهر سنندج قابل پیش‌بینی است (05/0 > p). همچنین، بین رضایت زناشویی با طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه رابطه منفی و معنی دار، و بین رضایت زناشویی با حمایت اجتماعی و سبک‌های دلبستگی رابطه مثبت و معنی‌دار وجود دارد (05/0>p). نتیجه گیری: نتایج نشان داد که رضایت زناشویی براساس طرحواره‌های ناسازگار اولیه، حمایت اجتماعی و سبک‌های دلبستگی زوجین در زنان متأهل قابل پیش‌بینی است.
Abstract Introduction: Marital satisfaction is a personal experience in marriage that can only be evaluated by the individual in response to the level of enjoyment of the marital relationship, and there are many factors that affect marital satisfaction in a shared life, and this feeling plays an important role in the level of normal family functioning. , the present study was conducted with the aim of predicting marital satisfaction based on initial incompatible schemas, social support and couple attachment styles in married women of Sanandaj city. Method: The current research is a descriptive study of the correlation type and the statistical population of those married women who referred to family counseling service centers in Sanandaj city in the middle of 1400 with a number of 440 people, who were selected by random sampling method and based on the sampling table of Karjesi and Morgan. 205 people were selected and studied. Research variables were conducted by Enrich's Marital Satisfaction Questionnaires, Young's early maladaptive schemas, Sherborn and Stewart's social support, and Collins and Reed's attachment styles. The obtained data were analyzed using multiple linear regression tests and Pearson's correlation coefficient test with the help of SPSS version 25 software. Results: The research results showed that marital satisfaction can be predicted based on initial incompatible schemas, social support and couple attachment styles in married women of Sanandaj city (p < 0.05). Also, there is a negative and significant relationship between marital satisfaction and primary maladaptive schemas, and a positive and significant relationship between marital satisfaction and social support and attachment styles (p<0.05). Conclusions: The results showed that marital satisfaction can be predicted based on the initial maladaptive schemas, social support and couple attachment styles in married women
References
1. Bean RC, Ledermann T, Higginbotham BJ, Galliher RV. Associations between Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Marital Stability in Remarriages. J Div Rem. 2020; 61(1):62-82. DOI:10.1080/10502556.2019.1619385
2. Karney BR, Bradbury TN. Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 2010s: Challenging conventional wisdom. J Marriage Fam. 2020; 82(1):100-116. DOI:10.1111/jomf.12635
3. Salehi H, Hosseinian S, Yazdi SM. The relationship between cognitive flexibility and successful marriage: The mediating role of cognitive emotion regulation. Rooyesh. 2021; 10(8):93-102. D.O.R. 20.1001.1.2383353.1400.10.8.2.6
4. Nugroho AH, Puspita DA, Mulawarman M. Penerapan Solution-Focused Brief Counseling (SFBC) untuk Meningkatkan Konsep Diri Akademik Siswa. J Bikotetik. 2018; 2(1):5-22. DOI:10.26740/bikotetik.v2n1.p93-99
5. Taghavi S. Gholamzadeh Jofre M, Shahbazi M. Comparison Effects of Solution-Focused Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Psychological Flexibility and Marital Satisfaction of Housewives. J Med Sci, 2020; 63(3):2448-2458. https://sid.ir/paper/973416/en
6. Imani M. Evaluation of the factor structure of the Flexibility-Psychology Questionnaire in students. J Educ Studi, 2016; 8(1):181-162.
7. Olson DH, Fournier DG, Druckman JM. Counselor’s Manual for PREPARE-ENRICH. (rev. ed.), Minneapolis, MN: Prepare- ENRICH, Inc; 1989.
8. Salimaniyan A, Mohammad A. A study of the relationship between emotional intelligence and marital satisfaction. Educ Res. 2009; 5(19):1-13.
9. Dinmohammadi S, Dadashi M, Ahmadnia E, Janani L, Kharaghani R.. The effect of solutionfocused counseling on violence rate and quality of life of pregnant women at risk of domestic violence: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021; 20(1):221-230. DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-34762/v1
10. Byrne M, Carr A, Clark M. The Efficacy of Behavioral Couples Therapy and Emotionally Focused Therapy for Couple Distress”, Contemporary Family Therapy. 2014; 26 (16): 361- 387, DOI:10.1007/s10591-004-0642-9
11. McHugh RK, Daughters SB, Lejuez CW, Murray HW, Hearon BA, Gorka SM, Otto MW. Shared variance among self-report and behavioral measures of distress intolerance. Cognitive therapy and research. 2011; 35(3): 266-275. DOI: 10.1007/s10608-010-9295-1
12. Howell AN, Leyro TM, Hogan J, Buckner JD, Zvolensky MJ. Anxiety sensitivity, distress tolerance, and discomfort intolerance in relation to coping and conformity motives for alcohol use and alcohol use problems among young adult drinkers. Addictive behaviors. 2010; 35(12), 1144-1147. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.07.003
13. González-Val R, Marcén M. Unemployment, marriage and divorce. Applied Economics. 2018; 50(13): 1495-1508. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1366642
14. Thoits PA. Stress and health: Major findings and policy implications. Journal of health and social behavior. 2010; 51(1_suppl): S41-S53. D.o.i: 10.1177/0022146510383499
15. Amato PR. The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children: An update. Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opa društvena pitanja. 2014; 23(1): 5-24. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x
16. Pirak A, Negarandeh R, Khakbazan Z. Post-Divorce Regret among Iranian Women: A Qualitative Study. International journal of community-based nursing and midwifery. 2019; 7(1): 75. D.o.i: 10.30476/IJCBNM.2019.40848
17. Rahman MM, Giedraitis VR, Akhtar MT. The social sanction of divorce: Who ultimately pay the social costs of its adverse effects? Sociology and Anthropology. 2013; 1(1): 26-33. DOI: 10.13189/sa.2013.010103
18. Asioni bare JBA, Olowonirejuoro OA. Family cohesion and level of communication betwees and their adolescent childeren. TNJGC. 2006; 11:52-60. DOI: 10.4314/njgc.v11i1.36990
19. Bowlby J. Patterns of attachment: Assessed in the strange situation and at home. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1980.
20. Rajaei A, Daneshpour M, Robertson J. The Effectiveness of Couples Therapy Based on the Gottman Method among Iranian Couples with Conflicts: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2019; 1-18. DOI:10.1080/15332691.2019.1567174
21. Robinson M, Ross J, Fletcher S, Burns CR, Lagdon S, Armour C. The Mediating Role of Distress Tolerance in the Relationship between Childhood Maltreatment and Mental Health Outcomes among University Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2019; 20(1):15-18. DOI: 10.1177/0886260519835002
22. Rose A, Anderson S, Miller R, Marks L, Hatch T, Card N. Longitudinal Test of Forgiveness and Perceived Forgiveness as Mediators between Religiosity and Marital Satisfaction in Long-Term Marital Relationships. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2019; 1(11): 1-19. DOI:10.1080/01926187.2018.1547667
23. Johnson MS, Wittenborn KA. New Research Findings on motionally Focused Therapy: Introduction to Special Section. Journal of marital and family therapy. 2018; 38(1): 18–22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00292.x
24. Lee ES. Effects of a happiness choice program based on reality therapy on subjective wellbeing and interpersonal relations in nursing students. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing. 2015; 29(3): 503-514. DOI:10.5932/JKPHN.2015.29.3.503
25. Olson DH, Waldvogel L, Schlieff, M. Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems: An Update. Journal of Family Theory & Review; 2019.
26. Salimaniyan A, Mohammad A. A study of the relationship between emotional intelligence and marital satisfaction. Educ Res. 2009; 5(19):1-13. PMID: 25792986;
27. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: A practitioner’s guide. 1st ed: Guilford Press; 2006.
28. Sadooghi Z, Aguilar-Vafaie ME, Rasoulzadeh Tabatabaie K, Esfehanian N. Factor Analysis of the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form in a Nonclinical Iranian Sample. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology. 2008; 14(2):214-9. URL: http://ijpcp.iums.ac.ir/article-1-474-en.html
29. Nasiri F, Abdolmaleki SE. Explaining the Relationship between Perceived Social Support and Quality of Life, Perceived Stress Mediator Role in Female-Headed Households in Sanandaj. Journal of Applied Sociology. 2017; 27(4): 99-116. D.o.i: 10.22108/JAS.2017.21163
30. Mohebbi M, Ghasemzadeh S, Farzad V. Review on practicality reliability, validity and normalization of couple's satisfaction scale among married women teachers in Tehran city. Journal of Applied Psychology Research.2017; 7(4): 163-179. D.o.i: 10.22059/JAPR.2017.63462
31. David P. Wedding the Gottman and Johnson approaches into an integrated model of couple therapy. The Family Journal. 2015; 23(4): 336-345. DOI:10.1177/1066480715601675
32. Bruns KM, O'Bryan EM, McLeish AC. An Examination of the Association Between Emotion Reactivity and Distress Tolerance Among College Students. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 2019; 207(6): 429-432, DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000990
33. Arcuri A. Dyadic perfectionism, communication patterns and relationship quality in couples; 2013.
34. Hasson Ohayon I, Ben-Pazi A, Silberg T, Pijnenborg GH, Goldzweig G. The mediating role of parental satisfaction between marital satisfaction and perceived family burden among parents of children with psychiatric disorders. Psychiatry research. 2019; 271: 105-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.037
35. Babcock JC, Gottman JM, Ryan KD, Gottman JS. A component analysis of a brief psycho educational couples' workshop: one‐year follow‐up results. Journal of Family Therapy. 2013; 35(3): 252-280. DOI:10.1111/1467-6427.12017