مقایسه ویژگی‌های شخصیتی و سبک‌های دفاعی در دختران دانشجو مبتلا به اختلال خوردن اجتنابی یا محدودکننده
محورهای موضوعی : روانشناسی زوجیننگين حبيبي 1 * , روژین بهرامی فر 2
1 - )نویسنده مسئول(، کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد همدان، همدان، ایران. Negin.habibi2011@gmail.com
2 - کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد همدان، همدان، ایران
کلید واژه: اختلال خوردن, اختلال خوردن اجتنابی یا محدودکننده, سبک‌های دفاعی, ویژگی‌های شخصیتی,
چکیده مقاله :
مقدمه: چاقی و اضافه وزن، ناشی از سبک زندگی ناسالم‌اند و به همین دلیل، مردم علاقه زیادی به دنبال کردن سبک زندگی سالم پیدا کرده‌اند. یکی از نتایج این علاقه، تماسل افراد به انواع رژیم‌های تغذیه‌ای است؛ که گاهی با بیماری و اختلالات خوردن ارتباط تنگاتنگی دارد و عوامل گوناگونی همانند کمال‌گرایی، ویژگی‌های شخصیتی و سبک‌های دفاعی و نارضایتی بدنی، می‌توانند در ایجاد، شدت و نوع اختلال خوردن مؤثر باشد. لذا این پژوهش با هدف، مقایسه ویژگی‌های شخصیتی و سبک‌های دفاعی در دختران دانشجو دارای مبتلا به اختلال خوردن اجتنابی یا محدودکننده انجام شد.
روش پژوهش: در این مطالعه علی مقایسه‌اي تعداد 62 دانشجو در پاییز 1403 از میان دانشجویان دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد همدان که طبق اظهارات خود به اختلال خوردن اجتنابی یا محدودکننده مبتلا بودند به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و تعداد 62 نفر از دانشجویان که از رژیم خاصی تبعیت نمی‌کردند و از لحاظ متغیرهاي جمعیت شناختی تا حد امکان با گروه مورد بررسی همتا بودند به عنوان گروه مقایسه انتخاب شدند. از هر دو گروه خواسته شد تا به پرسشنامه شخصیتی آیزنک و پرسشنامه سبک‌هاي دفاعی آندروز پاسخ دهند. داده‌ها با استفاده از روش آماري تحلیل واریانس چند متغیره با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخه 25 مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت.
یافته‌ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان داد، میانگین نمرات دانشجویان مبتلا به اختلال خوردن اجتنابی یا محدودکننده، نسبت به دیگر گروه دانشجویان در متغیرهای سبک‌هاي دفاعی رشد نایافته، روان آزردگی و ویژگی‌هاي شخصیتی روان رنجوري و برونگرایی بالاتر بوده است و در متغیر سبک‌هاي دفاعی رشد یافته نمرات کمتری گرفتند.
نتیجه‌گیری: براساس نتایج این پژوهش می‌توان گفت، بین دانشجویان مبتلا به اختلال خوردن اجتنابی یا محدودکننده و سایر دانشجویان در سبک‌هاي دفاعی و ویژگی‌هاي شخصیتی تفاوت معنادار وجود دارد.
© 2020 The Author(s). This work is published by family and health as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
Introduction: Obesity and overweight are caused by unhealthy lifestyles, and for this reason, people have become very interested in following a healthy lifestyle. One of the results of this interest is people's adherence to various dietary regimens, which are sometimes closely related to illness and eating disorders, and various factors such as perfectionism, personality traits, defensive styles, and body dissatisfaction can be effective in the development, severity, and type of eating disorder. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of Comparison of Personality Traits and Defensive Styles in Female Students with Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder.
Research Method: In this causal comparative study, 62 students from the Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch, who reported having avoidant or restrictive eating disorder, were selected using convenience sampling method in the fall of 2024, and 62 students who did not follow a specific diet and were as similar as possible to the study group in terms of demographic variables were selected as the comparison group. Both groups were asked to respond to the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (1975) and the Andrews Defense Styles Questionnaire (1993). The data were analyzed using the multivariate analysis of variance statistical method using SPSS version 25 software.
Results: The results of the study showed that the average scores of students with avoidant or restrictive eating disorder were higher than those of other groups of students in the variables of underdeveloped defense styles, neuroticism, and personality traits of neuroticism and extraversion, and they scored lower in the variable of developed defense styles.
Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, it can be said that there is a significant difference between students with avoidant or restrictive eating disorder and other students in defensive styles and personality traits.
Reference:
1. Attia E, Walsh BT. Eating Disorders: A Review. JAMA. 2025 Apr 8;333(14):1242-1252. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.0132. PMID: 40048192.
2. Mannan H, Touyz S, Hay P. Night eating and night eating syndrome: associations with dysfunctional eating behaviors, mental health and quality-of-life measures in Australian adults. Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Mar 13;30(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s40519-025-01732-5.
3. Aird CS, Reisinger BAA, Webb SN, Gleaves DH. Comparing social stigma of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder: A quantitative experimental study. J Eat Disord. 2025 Jan 27;13(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01198-x.
4. Gonidakis F. Eating disorders in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatriki. 2022 Dec 7; 33(4):267-270. Greek, Modern, English. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.096.
5. Lalonde-Bester S, Malik M, Masoumi R, Ng K, Sidhu S, Ghosh M, Vine D. Prevalence and Etiology of Eating Disorders in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Scoping Review. Adv Nutr. 2024 Apr;15(4):100193. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100193.
6. Guaiana G, Meader N, Barbui C, Davies SJ, Furukawa TA, Imai H, Dias S, Caldwell DM, Koesters M, Tajika A, Bighelli I, Pompoli A, Cipriani A, Dawson S, Robertson L. Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3
7. Fonseca NKO, Curtarelli VD, Bertoletti J, Azevedo K, Cardinal TM, Moreira JD, Antunes LC. Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: recent advances in neurobiology and treatment. J Eat Disord. 2024 Jun 7;12(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01021-z.
8. Menzel JE, Perry TR. Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Review and Recent Advances. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2024 Jul;22(3):288-300. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20240008.
9. Duffy F, Willmott E, Nimbley E, Lawton A, Sharpe H, Buchan K, Gillespie-Smith K. Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID)-Looking beyond the eating disorder lens? Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2024 Jul;32(4):824-827. doi: 10.1002/erv.3093.
10. Hamid S. 'Fussy eating' or avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder? Br Dent J. 2025 Feb;238(4):271-274. doi: 10.1038/s41415-024-8268-9.
11. Ramirez Z, Gunturu S. Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder. 2024 May 1. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 38753906.
12. Nicholls-Clow R, Simmonds-Buckley M, Waller G. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the impact of study quality on prevalence rates. Clin Psychol Rev. 2024 Dec;114:102502. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102502.
13. Tanner AB, Richmond TK. Assessing growth in children and adolescents with Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder. J Eat Disord. 2024 Jun 14;12(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01034-8.
14. Schneider E, Schmidt R, Cryan JF, Hilbert A. A Role for the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: A New Conceptual Model. Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Dec;57(12):2321-2328. doi: 10.1002/eat.24326.
15. Long JR, Damle LF. Adolescent Sexuality. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2024 Jun;51(2):299-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2024.02.004.
16. Shapiro D. On Psychodynamic Defense. Psychiatry. 2024 Fall;87(3):203-210. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2024.2381256.
17. Chessick RD. What hath freud wrought? Current confusion and controversies about the clinical practice of psychoanalysis and psychodynamic psychotherapy. Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2014 Dec;42(4):553-83. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2014.42.4.553.
18. Corradi RB. Psychoanalytic Contributions to Psychodynamic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy: Freud's Structural Hypothesis. Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;51(3):254-260. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2023.51.3.254.
19. Busch FN, Auchincloss EL. The Role of Psychoeducation in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy. Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2018 Spring;46(1):145-163. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2018.46.1.145.
20. Leichsenring F, Leibing E. Psychodynamic psychotherapy: a systematic review of techniques, indications and empirical evidence. Psychol Psychother. 2007 Jun;80(Pt 2):217-28. doi: 10.1348/147608306X117394.
21. Weinberg E, Mintz D. The Overall Diagnosis: Psychodynamic Psychiatry, Six-Minute Psychotherapy, and Patient-Centered Care. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018 Jun;41(2):263-275. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2018.01.008.
22. Levy KN, Ehrenthal JC, Yeomans FE, Caligor E. The efficacy of psychotherapy: focus on psychodynamic psychotherapy as an example. Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;42(3):377-421. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2014.42.3.377.
23. Abend SM. Psychic conflict and the concept of defense. Psychoanal Q. 1981 Jan;50(1):67-76. PMID: 7465708.
24. Maze JR, Henry RM. Problems in the concept of repression and proposals for their resolution. Int J Psychoanal. 1996 Dec;77 ( Pt 6):1085-100. PMID: 9119578.
25. Tavoloni V, Garofani J, Di Giuseppe M, Juli G, Muzi L, Innamorati M, Nappa MR. Research in Defense Mechanisms: What Do We Stand? Psychiatr Danub. 2024 Sep;36(Suppl 2):20-26. PMID: 39378447.
26. Ribadier A, Varescon I. Étude des styles défensifs, des défenses et des stratégies de coping au sein d’une population alcoolodépendante [Study of defense styles, defenses and coping strategies in alcohol-dependent population]. Encephale. 2017 May;43(3):223-228. French. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.06.003.
27. Gori A, Topino E, Palazzeschi L, Di Fabio A. Which personality traits can mitigate the impact of the pandemic? Assessment of the relationship between personality traits and traumatic events in the COVID-19 pandemic as mediated by defense mechanisms. PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251984.
28. Waugaman RM. Psychodynamic Defense-And Defensive Therapists. Psychiatry. 2024 Fall;87(3):218-222. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2024.2385087.
29. Leonhardt A, Fuchs M, Sevecke K. Übersichtsarbeiten / Review Articles. Das Unbehagen am eigenen Geschlecht – Geschlechtsinkongruenz in der ICD-11 / Sexual Self in Disquiet – Gender Incongruence in ICD-11. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2024 Nov;73(8):737-752. German. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2024.73.8.737.
30. Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG. Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnair (adult and junior). London: Hodder & Stoughton; 1975. www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=962039
31. Bakhshipour A, Bagharian Khorooshahi S. Psychometric properties of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) Short Scale. Contemporary Psychology, Biannual Journal of the IPA. 1385; 1(2): 3-12. https://bjcp.ir/article-1-952-fa.pdf
32. Andrews G, Singh M, Bond M. The Defense Style Question; 1993.
33. Heidarinasab, L., Shaeiri, M. Factorial Structure of the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40). Journal of Modern Psychological Researches, 2011; 6(21): 77-97. https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4170.html?lang=en
34. Lantz SE, Kaur J, Ray S. Freud's Developmental Theory. 2025 Apr 26. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 32491458.
35. Sauerteig LD. Loss of innocence: Albert Moll, Sigmund Freud and the invention of childhood sexuality around 1900. Med Hist. 2012 Apr;56(2):156-83. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2011.31.
36. Huang Y, Trollor JN, Foley KR, Arnold SRC. "I've Spent My Whole Life Striving to Be Normal": Internalized Stigma and Perceived Impact of Diagnosis in Autistic Adults. Autism Adulthood. 2023 Dec 1;5(4):423-436. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0066.
37. Ryan R, Hill S. Qualitative evidence synthesis informing our understanding of people's perceptions and experiences of targeted digital communication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 23;10(10):ED000141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000141.
38. O'Leary C, Ralphs R, Stevenson J, Smith A, Harrison J, Kiss Z, Armitage H. The effectiveness of abstinence-based and harm reduction-based interventions in reducing problematic substance use in adults who are experiencing homelessness in high income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis: A systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 21;20(2):e1396. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1396.
39. Mohd Tohit NF, Haque M. Forbidden Conversations: A Comprehensive Exploration of Taboos in Sexual and Reproductive Health. Cureus. 2024 Aug 12;16(8):e66723. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66723.
40. Horey D, Kealy M, Davey MA, Small R, Crowther CA. Interventions for supporting pregnant women's decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;2013(7):CD010041. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010041.pub2.
41. Vaillant G E. Ego Mechanisms of Defense: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers, Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Press 1999.
42. Nickel R, Egle UT. Psychological defense styles, childhood adversities and psychopathology in adulthood. Child Abuse Negl. 2006 Feb;30(2):157-70. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2005.08.016.
43. Jamilian HR, Zamani N, Darvishi M, Khansari MR. Study of defensive methods and mechanisms in developmental, emotional (internalization), and disruptive behavior (externalization) disorders. Glob J Health Sci. 2014 Sep 18;6(7 Spec No):109-15. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v6n7p109. PMID: 25363187; PMCID: PMC4796512.