بررسی صفات رشدی و ترکیب اسیدهای چرب گیاه دارویی Carthamus tinctorius رقم صفه تحت تاثیر هیومیک اسید و کلات¬روی
محورهای موضوعی : گیاهان دارویی
فاطمه نژاد حبیب وش
1
(استادیاردانشگاه ارومیه - دانشکده علوم- گروه زیست شناسی)
زینب رشیدی
2
(دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه گیاهان دارویی، مرکز آموزش عالی شهید باکری میاندوآب، دانشگاه ارومیه)
علی حیدرزاده
3
(گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران)
کلید واژه: گلرنگ, ریز مغذی, اولئیک اسید, لینولئیک اسید,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر به منظور ارزیابی عملکرد گلرنگ تحت تاثیر هیومیک اسید و کلات¬روی در شرایط مزرعه¬ای بوده است. آزمایش به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب بلوک¬های کامل تصادفی در مزرعه¬ای در شهرستان سقز در سال 1399 اجرا گردید. نتایج مطالعه حاضر نشان داد اثر تیمار هیومیک اسید در سطح احتمال 5 درصد بر ارتفاع بوته و تعداد شاخه¬های فرعی در سطح احتمال 5 درصد معنی¬دار شد. اثر کلات¬روی و برهم¬کنش تیمارها بر هر دو صفت در سطح احتمال 1 درصد معنی¬دار شد. کاربرد هر سه تیمار محلول¬پاشی (کلات¬روی، هیومیک اسید و برهم کنش تیمارها) توانست تاثیر معنی¬دار بر تعداد دانه در بوته بگذارد. یشترین تعداد دانه در بوته در تیمار تلفیقی 1 میلی¬گرم در لیتر کلات¬روی و 400 میلی¬گرم در لیتر هیومیک اسید (33/125) و همچنین تیمار 2 میلی¬گرم در لیتر کلات¬روی (25/123) و کمترین تعداد آن در تیمار تلفیقی 100 میلی¬گرم در لیتر هیومیک اسید و 2 میلی¬گرم در لیتر کلات¬روی وجود داشت. تیمار کلات¬روی و تیمار تلفیقی کلات¬روی و هیومیک اسید تاثیر معنی¬دار بر تعداد طبق در بوته گلرنگ داشتند ولی تیمار هیومیک اسید تاثیر معنی¬دار بر این صفت نداشت. مقایسه میانگین¬ها نشان داد که بالاترین تعداد طبق در تیمار 1 میلی¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬لیتر در لیتر کلات¬روی و 400 میلی¬گرم در لیتر هیومیک اسید مشاهده شد (6) و کمترین مقدار آن در تیمار تلفیقی 200 میلی¬گرم در لیتر هیومیک اسید و 2 میلی¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬لیتر در لیتر کلات¬روی مشاهده شد (75/2). همچنین، نتایج نشان داد که تاثیر محلول¬پاشی هیومیک اسید بر اندازه عرض برگ معنی¬دار نشد اما تاثیر کلات¬روی در سطح احتمال 5 درصد و تیمار تلفیقی کلات-روی و هیومیک اسید در سطح احتمال 1 درصد معنی¬دار شد. م نتایج مطالعه حاضر نشان داد میزان لینولئیک اسید با افزودن هیومیک اسید و کلات¬روی، افزایش پیدا کرد ولی میزان اولئیک اسید کاهش یافت.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of safflower under the influence of humic acid and zinc chelate in field conditions. The experiment was carried out in a factorial form in the form of randomized complete blocks in a farm in Saqez city in 2019. The results showed that the effect of humic acid treatment was significant at the 5% probability level on plant height and on the number of sub-branches at the 5% probability level. The effect of zinc chelate and the interaction of treatments on both traits were significant at the 1% probability level. The use of all three foliar treatments (humic acid zinc chelate and the interaction of treatments) had a significant effect on the number of seeds per plant. Comparison of averages showed. The highest number of seeds per plant in the combined treatment of 1 mg/liter of zinc chelate and 400 mg/liter of humic acid (125/33) as well as the treatment of 2 mg/liter of zinc chelate (123/25) and the lowest number in There was a combined treatment of 100 mg/l of humic acid and 2 mg/l of zinc chelate. The results showed that zinc chelate treatment and the combined treatment of zinc chelate and humic acid had a significant effect on the number of leaves in safflower plant, but humic acid treatment did not have a significant effect on this trait. C The results of the present study showed that the amount of linoleic acid increased with the addition of humic acid and zinc chelate, but the amount of oleic acid decreased.
Ahmad, Y.M., Shahlaby, E.A., Shnan, N.T. 2011. The use of organic and inorganic cultures in improving vegetative growth, yield characters and antioxidant activity of roselle plants (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). African Journal of Biotechnology 10(11): 1988-1996.
AL-lahham, O., El Assi, N.M. and Fayyad, M. 2007. Translocation of heavy metals to tomato (Solanum lycopersicom L.) fruit irrigated with treated wastewater. Journal of Scientia Horticulturae 113:250-254.
Ayas, H. and Gulser, F. 2005. “The effect of sulfur and humic acid on yield components and macronutrient contents of spinach”, Journal of Biological Sciences 5 (6): 801- 804.
Bahrani, A. 2015. Effect of some micro and macro nutrients on seed yield and oil content of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). International Journal of Chemical Environmental and Biological Sciences 3(1): 71-74.
Basalma, D. 2015. Effects of humic acid on the emergence and seedling growth of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences 2(1): 402-1406.
Camas, N. and Esendal. E. 2006. Estimates of broad-sense heritability for seed yield and yield components of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Hereditas 143, Pp 55-57.
Delfine, S., Togenetti, R., Desiderio, E. and Alivino, A. 2005. Effect of foliar application of N and humic acids on growth and yield of durum wheat. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25, 183-191.
Dursun, A., Guvenc, I. and Turan, M. 2002. Effect of different levels of humic acid on seedling growth and macro and micronutrient contents of tomato and eggplant. ACTA Agrobotanica 56: 81-88.
Ebrahimian, E. and A. Bybordi. 2001. Effect of iron foliar fertilization on growth, seed and oil yield of sunflower grown under different irrigation regimes. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 9(5): 621-627.
Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In A. Klute (ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part 1: Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph 9:383–411.
Ghorbani, S., Khazaie, H.R., Kafi, M. and Bannayan Aval, M. 2010. Effects of humic acid application in irrigation water on yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agroecology 2: 123-131. (in Persian with English Abstract)
Gee, G.W., and J.W. Bauder. 1986. Particle-size Analysis. p. 383–411. In: Klute, A.(ed.). Meth ods of soil analysis. Physical and mineralogical methods.Agronomy Monograph 9 (2ed).American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Hassan, N., Irshad, S, Saddiq, M.S., Bashir., S, Khan, S., Wahid, M.A., Khan, R.R. and Yousra, M. 2019. Potential of zinc treatment in improving stand establishment, phenology, yield and grain biofortification of wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition 42(14): 1676-1692.
Heidarian, A.R., Kord, H., Mostafavi, K., and Amin-Mashhadi, F. 2011. Investigating Fe and Zn foliar application on yield and its components of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) at different growth stages. Sustainable Agriculture 28:41-54.
Karimi, F. and Tadayyon, A. 2018. Effect of humic acid spraying on yield and some morphological characteristic of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under drought stress conditions. Applied Research in Field Crops 31(1): 19-38. (In Persian).
Moradi, P., Pasari, B. and Fayyaz, F. 2017. The effects of fulvic acid application on seed and oil yield of safflower cultivars. Journal of Central European Agriculture 18(3): 584-597.
Kadkhodaei, A. and Ehsanzade, P. 2011. Grain yield, leaf chlorophyll, proline and soluble carbohydrates content of linseed under different irrigation regimes. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 42(1): 125-131.
Khalid, N., Khan, R.S., Hussain, M.I., Farooq, M., Ahmad, A. and Ahmed, I. 2017. A comprehensive characterization of safflower oil for its potential applications as a bioactive food ingredient -A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 2017; 66: 176 - 86.
Khan, A., Guramni, A.R., Khan, M.Z., Hussain, F., Akhtaencer, M.E. and Khan, S. 2012. Effect of humic acid on growth, yield, nutrient composition, photosynthetic pigment and total sugar contents of peas (Pisum sativum L). Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan 6: 56-63.
Klut, A. 1986. Method of Soil Analysis: Physical, Chemical and Mineralogical Methods. Journal of Soil Science Society of America pp: 432-449.
Kownles, P.F. and Ashri, A. 2012. Safflower Carthamus tinctorius (Compositae). Evolution of Crop Plants 23(2): 47–50.
Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorous in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA, Circ. 939.
Malakouti, M. J. 2007. Zinc is a neglected element in the life cycle of plants: A review. Middle Eastern and Russian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 1: 1-12.
MacCarthy, P, Clapp, C.E, Malcom, R.L. and Bloom, P.R. 2001. Humic substances in soil and crop sciences: selected readings. American Society of Agronomy Madison.
Marschener, H.1995. Boron. In Mineral nutrition of higher plants, ed. Horst Marschner, 2nd ed., 379– 396. San Diego: Academic Press.
Mohsennia, O and Jalilian J. 2012. Response of safflower seed quality characteristics to different soil fertility systems and irrigation disruption. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 3(5): 968-976.
Moradi, P, Pasari, B. and Fayyaz, F. 2017. The effects of fulvic acid application on seed and oil yield of safflower cultivars. Journal of Central European Agriculture 18(3): 584-597.
Mosavi, S. R., Galavi, M. and Ahmadvand, G. 2007. Effect of zinc and manganese foliar application on yield, quality and enrichment on potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Asian Journal of Plant Science 6: 1256-1260.
Moradi, R., Afshari, H., Masoud Sinaki, J. and Zadeh Bagheri, M. 2014. Investigation effect of cultivar, planting date and humic acid on protein content, oil seed and chlorophyll content in (Ricinus communis L.). Journal of Plant Ecophysiology 6: 80-90.
Moradi-Telavat, M.R., Roshan, F. and Siadat, S.A. 2015. Effect of foliar application of zinc sulfate on minerals content, seed and oil yields of two safflower cultivars (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 17(2): 153-164.
Movahhedy-dehnavy, M., Modarres-Sanavy, S. A. M. and Mokhtassi-Bidgoli, A. 2009. Foliar application of zinc and manganese improves seed yield and quality of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) grown under water deficit stress. Industrial Crops and Products 30: 82-92.
Naseri, A., Masoudi, T., Khorshidi, M.B. and Abdi, Ghazi Jahani, A. 2017. The effect of water quality on the yield and yield components of four genotypes of safflower. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 31(3): 301-313.
Nelson, D.W. and Somers, L.E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods. Madision, Wisconsin. USA, pp: 961-1010.
Nikbakht, A., Goli, S.A.H., Kargar, M. and Ahmadzsdeh, S. 2011. Effect of humic acid on yield and oil characteristics of Silybum marianum and Cucurbita pepo convar. Pepo var. Striaca seeds. Herba Polonica 57:25-83.
Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, C.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U. S. Department of Agricultur Circular. Government . Printing Office, Washington D.C., 939, 1 -19.
Pasandi,, M., Janmohammadi, M., Abasi, A. and Sabaghnia, N. 2018. Oil characteristics of safflower seeds under different nutrient and moisture management, Nova Biotechnologica et Chimica 17, 86-94.
Pasban Eslam, B. 2013. Effect of planting arrangement on seed yield and its components of fall safflower. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 23: 169-177.
Rahimi, M.M. and Mazaheri. D. 2004. Effects of micronutrient of iron and zinc on the yield and components yield second cultivation at two different varieties of sunflower in Arsanjan region. Journal of Pajouhesh and Sazandegi in Agronomy and Horticulture 64: 16-21. (In Persian).
Rahimi, Z., Mozafari, H. and Hassanpour Darvishi, H. 2016. Investigation the effect of humic acid in irrigation water on yield and yield components of rapeseed. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, 12(1): 95- 106.
Rhoades, J.D. 1996. Salinity: Electerical conductivity and total dissolved soils. In: Sparks, D.L. (Eds), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, Chemical methods. Journal of Soil Science Society of America 417-435.
Seyed Ahmadi, A. and Aziz Karimi, F. 2003. Instruction planting and harvesting canola. Agriculture Organization of Khuzestan. Farm Management, 14 Pp.
Singh, N. and Mike, Ch. 2006. Multivariate statistical approach to socialization and consumer activities of young adults. The Marketing Management Journal 46(5): 57-64.
Singh, V., Jadhar, R.R, Atre, G.E. and Kale, R.V. 2017. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) an underutilized leafy vegetable. Current Science, 113(5): 857-858.
Thomas, G. W. (1996). soil pH and soil activity, In D. L. Sparks (Eds), Methods of soil analysis, Part 3- Chemical Methods. Agronomy Monograph (vol. 9), ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, 475-490.
Yari, P., Keshtkar, A.H. and Sepehri, A. 2015. Evaluation of water stress effect on growth and yield of spring safflower. Plant Production Technology 14(2): 101-117.
Verlinden, G., Pycke, B., Mrtens, J., Debersaques, F., Verheyen, K., Baert, G., Bries, J. and Haesaert, G. 2009. Application of humic substances results in consistent increases in crop yield and nutrient uptake. Journal of Plant Nutrition 32: 1407-1426.
Zakaria, M.S., Hafez, S.A., Basyony, A.E. and Alkassas, A.E.R. 2006. Cottonseed, protein, oil yields and oil properties as affected by nitrogen fertilization and foliar application of potassium and a plant growth retardant. Agricultural Sciences 2(1): 56-65.
Weiss, E. 2000. Oilseed Crops. Blackwell Publishing Limited, London, UK.
Zakaria, M.S., Hafez, S.A., Basyony, A.E. and Alkassas, A.E.R 2006. Cottonseed, protein, oil yields and oil properties as affected by nitrogen fertilization and foliar application of potassium and a plant growth retardant. Agricultural Sciences 2(1): 56-65.