تاثیر بی‌نزاکتی خانوادگی بر رفتارهای انحرافی در محیط کار از طریق تعارض کار-خانواده و غنی سازی کار-خانواده
محورهای موضوعی : مطالعات رفتاری در مدیریت
عباس قائدامینی هارونی
1
,
زهره امیری فارسانی
2
,
ایمان محمودی خواه
3
,
مریم صالحی فارسانی
4
,
علی رضا جعفری فارسانی
5
,
آزیتا الله بخشیان
6
1 - مربی، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مرکز فارسان ، فارسان، ایران
2 - دانشجوی کارشناسی، گروه تربیت مربی پیش دبستانی، دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مرکز فارسان، فارسان، ایران
3 - دانشجوی کارشناسی، گروه مدیریت فرهنگی، دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مرکز فارسان، فارسان، ایران
4 - دانشجوی کارشناسی، گروه مدیریت فرهنگی، دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مرکز فارسان، فارسان، ایران
5 - دانشجوی کارشناسی، گروه مدیریت فرهنگی، دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی مرکز فارسان، فارسان،ایران
6 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، کارمند، دانشگاه جامع علمی کاربردی واحد استانی چهارمحال و بختیاری، ایران
کلید واژه: بی‌نزاکتی خانوادگی, رفتارهای انحرافی در محیط کار, تعارض کار-خانواده, غنی سازی کار-خانواده,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی تاثیر بی‌نزاکتی خانوادگی بر رفتارهای انحرافی در محیط کار از طریق تعارض کار-خانواده و غنی سازی کار-خانواده بود. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر نحوه گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر را کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه‌های استان چهارمحال و بختیاری به تعداد 2200 نفر تشکیل دادند که از طریق فرمول کوکران تعداد 600 نفر به عنوان نمونه از طریق روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌‌ای انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش پرسش نامه استاندارد بی‌نزاکتی خانوادگی لیم و تای (2014)، پرسش‌نامه استاندارد رفتارهای انحرافی در محیط کار رابیسنون و بنت(1999( ، پرسش‌نامه استاندارد تعارض کار-خانواده کارلسون و کارمار (2000) و پرسش‌نامه استاندارد غنی سازی کار-خانواده کارلسون و همکاران( 2006) بود که روایی پرسش‌نامه‌ها بر اساس روایی محتوایی، صوری و سازه مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند و پس از اصطلاحات لازم روایی مورد تائید قرار گرفت و از سوی دیگرپایایی پرسش‌نامه‌ها با روش آلفای کرونباخ به ترتیب80/0، 85/0 ، 88/0 و 88/0 برآورد شد و تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با استفاده مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام گرفت. یافته‌ها نشان داد بی‌نزاکتی خانوادگی بر رفتارهای انحرافی در محیط کار تاثیر مثبت داشت که ضریب تاثیر آن 65/0 بود و تعارض کار-خانواده و غنی سازی کار-خانواده در بین رابطه بین بی‌نزاکتی خانوادگی با رفتارهای انحرافی در محیط کار ، به عنوان متغیرهای میانجی ایفای نقش ایفا کردند.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of family incivility on deviant behaviors in the workplace through work-family conflict and work-family enrichment. The present study was applied in terms of its purpose and descriptive in terms of correlational data collection. The statistical population of the present study consisted of all the employees of the universities of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces in the number of 2200 people, and 600 people were selected as a sample through the stratified random sampling method through the Cochran formula.The research tools are Lim and Tay's (2014) family incivility standard questionnaire, Robinson and Bennett's (1999) standard workplace deviant behavior questionnaire, Carlson and Karmar's (2000) work-family conflict standard questionnaire, and Carlson and Karmar's (2000) standard work-family enrichment questionnaire. colleagues (2006) that the validity of the questionnaires was examined based on content, form and construct validity and after the necessary terms, the validity was confirmed and on the other hand, the reliability of the questionnaires was 0.80, 0.85, 0.88 respectively with Cronbach's alpha method. 0 and 0.88 were estimated and data analysis was done using structural equation modeling.The findings showed that family incivility had a positive effect on deviant behaviors in the workplace, the coefficient of which was 0.65, and work-family conflict and work-family enrichment in the relationship between family incivility and deviant behaviors in the workplace, as mediating variables. They played a role
References
Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and inter- preting interactions. Sage.
Allen, T. D., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2014). Work-family conflict among members of full-time dual-earner couples: An examination of family life stage, gender, and age. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 376–384.
Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471.
Bai, Q., Lin, W., & Wang, L. (2016). Family incivility and counter- productive work behavior: A moderated mediation model of self- esteem and emotional regulation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 11–19.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory (Vol. 1). ReCAPP. Bennett, R. J., Marasi, S., & Locklear, L. (2018). Workplace deviance.
Oxford University Press.
Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. Klein & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
Braun, S., & Nieberle, K. W. A. M. (2017). Authentic leadership extends beyond work: A multilevel model of work-family con- flict and enrichment. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(6), 780–797.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instru- ments (Field methods in cross-cultural research). Sage.
Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 169–198. Carlson, D. S., & Kacmar, K. M. (2000). Work-family conflict in the organization: Do life role values make a difference? Journal of
Management, 26(5), 1031–1054.
Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Wayne, J. H., & Grzywacz, J. G. (2006). Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Devel- opment and validation of a work–family enrichment scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(1), 131–164.
Chen, M., Liang, H., & Wang, T. (2020). Does family undermining influence workplace deviance? A mediated moderation model. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 48(9), 1–13.
Chen, Z., & Powell, G. N. (2012). No pain, no gain? A resource-based model of work-to-family enrichment and conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(1), 89–98.
Cheng, K., Zhu, Q., & Lin, Y. (2021). Family-supportive supervisor behavior, felt obligation, and unethical pro-family behavior: The moderating role of positive reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Busi- ness Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04765-9
Crain, T. L., & Stevens, S. C. (2018). Family-supportive supervisor behaviors: A review and recommendations for research and prac- tice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(7), 869–888.
De Clercq, D., Haq, I. U., Azeem, M. U., & Raja, U. (2018). Family incivility, emotional exhaustion at work, and being a good soldier: The buffering roles of waypower and willpower. Journal of Busi- ness Research, 89(8), 27–36.
De Clercq, D., Rahman, Z., & Haq, I. U. (2019). Explaining helping behavior in the workplace: The interactive effect of family-to- work conflict and Islamic work ethic. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(4), 1167–1177.
Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 35–47.
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.
Ferguson, M., Carlson, D., Hunter, E. M., & Whitten, D. (2012). A two-study examination of work–family conflict, production devi- ance and gender. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 245–258. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and sta-
tistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388.
Frone, M. R. (2003). Work-family balance. Handbook of occupa- tional health psychology (pp. 143–162). American Psychologi- cal Association.
Gu Y, Wang C and Ma J (2024) Explaining the negative effects of workplace incivility on family lives: a moderated mediation model of surface acting and resource providing variables. Front. Psychol. 15:1409144.
Goh, Z., Ilies, R., & Wilson, K. S. (2015). Supportive supervisors improve employees’ daily lives: The role supervisors play in the impact of daily workload on life satisfaction via work–family con- flict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 65–73.
Gopalan, N., Pattusamy, M., & Goodman, S. (2021). Family incivility and work-engagement: Moderated mediation model of personal resources and family-work enrichment. Current Psychology, 1, 1–12.
Hameed, Z., Khan, I. U., Chudhery, M. A., & Ding, D. (2017). Incivility and Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Emotional Regulation and Psychological Distress. International Journal of Applied Behavioral Economics (IJABE), 6(3), 1-22.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Manage- ment Review, 31(1), 72–92.
Hakanen, J. J., Peeters, M. C. W., & Perhoniemi, R. (2011). Enrichment processes and gain spirals at work and at home: A 3-year cross- lagged panel study. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 8–30.
Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Bodner, T., & Crain, T. (2013). Meas- urement development and validation of the family supportive supervisor behavior short-form (FSSB-SF). Journal of Occupa- tional Health Psychology, 18(3), 285–296.
Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Yragui, N. L., Bodner, T. E., & Hanson,
G. C. (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional measure of family supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSB). Jour- nal of Management, 35(4), 837–856.
Hammer, L. B., Kossek, E. E., Zimmerman, K., & Daniels, R. (2007). Clarifying the construct of family-supportive supervisory behav- iors (FSSB): A multilevel perspective. In P. L. Perrewé, & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Exploring the Work and Non-Work Interface (Vol. 6, pp. 165–204, Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at con- ceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and philosophy of stress. British Journal of Medical Psychology,
44(5), 408–409.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 337–421.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adapta- tion. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307–324.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychol- ogy, 78(2), 306–309.
Klein, K., & Kozlowski, S. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Xxix, 605 Jossey-Bass.
Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Work- place social support and work–family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313.
Krischer, M. M., Penney, L. M., & Hunter, E. M. (2010). Can coun- terproductive work behaviors be productive? CWB as emotion- focused coping. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15(2), 154–166.
Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131–142.
Lim, S., & Lee, A. (2011). Work and nonwork outcomes of workplace incivility: Does family support help? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(1), 95–111.
Lim, S., & Tai, K. (2014). Family incivility and job performance: A moderated mediation model of psychological distress and core self-evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 351–359.
Marescaux, E., Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., Ilies, R., & Bosch, M.
J. (2020). When employees and supervisors (do not) see eye to eye on family supportive supervisor behaviours: The role of seg- mentation desire and work-family culture. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 121, 103471.
Naeem, M., Weng, Q. D., Ali, A., & Hameed, Z. (2020). Linking fam- ily incivility to workplace incivility: Mediating role of negative emotions and moderating role of self-efficacy for emotional regu- lation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 69–81.
Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 400–410.
O’Driscoll, M. P., Poelmans, S., Spector, P. E., Kalliath, T., Allen, T. D., Cooper, C. L., et al. (2003). Family-responsive interventions, perceived organizational and supervisor support, work-family conflict, and psychological strain. International Journal of Stress Management, 10(4), 326–344.
Pan, S. Y., Chuang, A., & Yeh, Y. J. (2021). Linking supervisor and subordinate’s negative work–family experience: The role of family supportive supervisor behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organi- zational Studies, 28(1), 17–30.
Peng, Y., Jex, S., Zhang, W., Ma, J., & Matthews, R. A. (2020). Elder- care demands and time theft: Integrating family-to-work conflict and spillover–crossover perspectives. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(1), 45–58.
Podasakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Porath, C. L., & Erez, A. (2007). Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1181–1197.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.
Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012). Advantages of Monte Carlo con- fidence intervals for indirect effects. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 77–98.
Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models.
SAGE.
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant work- place behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.
Rosen, C. C., Koopman, J., Gabriel, A. S., & Johnson, R. E. (2016). Who strikes back? A daily investigation of when and why inci- vility begets incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(11), 1620–1634.
Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empow- erment to the next level, a multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332–349.
Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2013). Episodic work-family con- flict, cardiovascular indicators, and social support: An experience sampling approach. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 262–275.
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspec- tive on the work-home interface: The work-home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7), 545–556.
ten Brummelhuis, L. L., ter Hoeven, C. L., Bakker, A. B., & Peper, B. (2011). Breaking through the loss cycle of burnout: The role of motivation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychol- ogy, 84(2), 268–287.
Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., & Hu, P.J.-
H. (2019). Children’s internet addiction, family-to-work conflict, and job outcomes: A study of parent–child dyads. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 903–927.
Wayne, J. H., Casper, W. J., Matthews, R. A., & Allen, T. D. (2013). Family-supportive organization perceptions and organizational commitment: The mediating role of work–family conflict and enrichment and partner attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 606–622.
Wayne, J. H., Matthews, R., Crawford, W., & Casper, W. J. (2020). Predictors and processes of satisfaction with work–family balance: Examining the role of personal, work, and family resources and conflict and enrichment. Human Resource Management, 59(1), 25–42.
Wu, C., Chen, Y.-C., & Umstattd Meyer, M. R. (2020). A moderated mediation model of emotional labor and service performance: Examining the role of work–family interface and physically active leisure. Human Performance, 33(1), 34–51.
Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(3), 235–244.
Zhang, S., & Tu, Y. (2018). Cross-domain effects of ethical leadership on employee family and life satisfaction: The moderating role of family-supportive supervisor behaviors. Journal of Business Eth- ics, 152(4), 1085–1097.