طراحی مدل اثر تحمل ابهام بر امیدواری با نقش واسطه‌ای بهزیستی فضیلت‌گرا در ورزشکاران معلول
محورهای موضوعی : مطالعات روانشناسی اجتماعی در ورزشسجاد اسدی قارنه 1 , شکوفه متقی 2
1 - گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه اردکان
2 - گروه روان شناسی عمومی ، دانشگاه اردکان
کلید واژه: امید, بهزیستی, تحمل ابهام, فضیلت‌گرایی, معلول ,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف تبیین مدل اثر تحمل ابهام بر امیدواری، با نقش واسطه‌ای بهزیستی فضیلت‌گرا در ورزشکاران معلول انجام شد. روش‌شناسی: روش پژوهش بر اساس هدف، کاربردی و مطالعه به روش توصیفی-پیمایشی انجام شده است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، ورزشکاران معلول استان اصفهان بودند که با استفاده از روش در دسترس، 106 نفر از آنان به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شده و به پرسشنامه‌های پاسخ دادند. برای بررسی روابط بین اجزای مدل و تحلیل داده‌ها، از روش معادلات ساختاری Structural Modeling Equation PLS (Smart PLS SEM) نسخه ۳ استفاده شد. یافته‌ها: بر اساس نتایج ضریب تعیین مدل روی امید و بهزیستی فضیلت‌گرا به ترتیب 268/0 و 717/0 بود. با توجه به معناداری ضرایب مسیر، تمامی مسیر‌ها در مدل باقی ماند و نقش میانجی بهزیستی فضیلت‌گرا در ارتباط تحمل ابهام با امید پذیرفته شد. نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به یافته‌های این پژوهش می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که امیدواری در معلولین ورزشکار، با افزایش تحمل ابهام و بهزیستی فضیلت‌گرا افزایش نشان می‌دهد. بنابراین پیشنهاد می‌گردد فضیلت‌گرایی در جامعه ورزشکاران معلول مورد تاکید و آموزش قرار گیرد و با ارائه آموزش‌های روانی-تربیتی در حوزه تحمل ابهام، امیدواری در این جامعه افزایش یابد.
Objectives: The present research was conducted with the aim of explaining the model of the effect of tolerance of ambiguity on hope, with the mediating role of eudaimonic well-being in disabled athletes. Methods: The research method was based on the goal, applicability, and conducted using a descriptive-survey approach. The statistical population of this research comprised disabled athletes in Isfahan province, from whom 106 individuals were selected as the sample using the available method and responded to the questionnaires. To examine the relationships between model components and analyze the data, Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) method was employed using SmartPLS version 3. Results: Based on the findings of this research, it can be concluded that hope in disabled athletes increases with higher ambiguity tolerance and eudaimonic well-being. Therefore, it is recommended to emphasize and teach eudaimonia in the community of disabled athletes, and by providing psychological-educational training in the area of tolerance of ambiguity, hope within this community can be enhanced.
Aalipour, K., Abbasi, M., Mirderikvand, F., & Khorramabad, I. (2018). The Effect of Teaching Breath’s thinking Strategies on Subjective Well-Being and Tolerance of Ambiguity among Students. J Educat Strateg Med Sci, 11(47), 1-7. https://www.sid.ir/paper/174171/.
Abtahinia, A., & Rastgoo, S. (2020). The Impact of Eudemonic Well-Being on the Quality of Life of Volleyball Players in Veterans and Disabled Teams with the Mediating Role of Social Support. Research on Educational Sport, 8(20), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.22089/RES.2020.8100.1765.
Ahmadi, M., Namazizadeh, M., & Behzadnia, B. (2014). The relationship between Basic psychological needs and indices of well-being (Eudaimonia and Hedonia) in physical activity of motional-physical disabled individuals. Sport Psychology Studies, 2(6), 95-104. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/331411/.
Cuppello, S., Treglown, L., & Furnham, A. (2023). Intelligence, Personality and Tolerance of Ambiguity. Journal of Intelligence, 11(6), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11060102.
Furnham A., Marks J. (2013). Tolerance of ambiguity: a review of the recent literature. Psychology 4, 717–728. doi: 10.4236/psych.2013.49102.
Ghadrdan, R., Hasanbeigi, H., & Tabesh, S. (2020). Investigating barriers to athletic and non-athlete disability participation in sports activities (Case study: Qazvin). Journal of Nurse and Physician within War, 7(24 ). https://sid.ir/paper/377401/en.
Ghasemi, A. A., Moumeni, M., & Khankeh, H. R. (2010). Comparison of body image between disabled athletes, disabled non-athletes and non-disabled non-athletes males. Archives of Rehabilitation, 10(4), 26-31. https://sid.ir/paper/43403/en.
Hancock, J., & Mattick, K. (2020). Tolerance of ambiguity and psychological well-being in medical training: A systematic review. Medical education, 54(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14031.
Heidary, A. (2013). Comparison of social damage (public health, sport identity, sport motivation and social adjustment) among disabled athletes and non-athletes Disabled Welfare Department in Ahwaz. Journal of Social Psychology, 8(29), 13-32. https://sid.ir/paper/175099/en.
Huang S. (2022). A Review of the Relationship Between EFL Teachers' Academic Buoyancy, Ambiguity Tolerance, and Hopelessness. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 831258. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.831258
Macdougall, H., O’Halloran, P., Shields, N., & Sherry, E. (2015). Comparing the Well-Being of Para and Olympic Sport Athletes: A Systematic Review, Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 32(3), 256-276.
Mack, D. E., Wilson, P. M., Gunnell, K. E. Gilchrist, J. D., Kowalski, K. C., Crocker, P. R. E. (2012). Health-enhancing physical activity: Associations with markers of well-being. Applied Psychology: Health & Well-being, 4: 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2012.01065.x.
McDermott, D. & Snyder, C.R. (2000).The Great Big Book of Hope Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications. https://www.amazon.com/Great-Big-Book-Hope/dp/1572242124.
McLain, D. L. (2009). Evidence of the properties of an ambiguity tolerance measure: The multiple stimulus types ambiguity tolerance scale–II (MSTAT–II). Psychological reports, 105(3), 975-988.
Miller JF, Powers MJ. Development of an instrument to measure hope. Nurs Res. 1988 Jan-Feb;37(1):6-10. PMID: 3340583. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3340583/
Murphy E. R. (2023). Hope and well-being. Current opinion in psychology, 50, 101558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101558
Pack, S., Kelly, S., and Arvinen-Barrow, M. (2017). “I think I became a swimmer rather than just someone with a disability swimming up and down:” Paralympic athlete’s perceptions of self and identity development. Disabil. Rehabil. 39, 2063–2070. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1217074.
Puce, L., Okwen, P. M., Yuh, M. N., Akah Ndum Okwen, G., Pambe Miong, R. H., Kong, J. D., & Bragazzi, N. L. (2023). Well-being and quality of life in people with disabilities practicing sports, athletes with disabilities, and para-athletes: Insights from a critical review of the literature. Frontiers in Psychology,14, 1071656. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1071656.
Pursultani, H. (2003). Relationships between Physical Activity and General Health in Iranians Disabled Athletes. Journal of Movement Science & Sports, 1(2), 10-17. https://sid.ir/paper/74810/en.
Ryff, C.D., & Singer B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psych. Inqu. 9: 1–28.
Shaterian Mohammadi, F., Alizadeh, F., & Nikokar, A. (2014). The efficiency of tolerance of ambiguity on meta-cognition believes and academic engagement among college students. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 1(1), 31-47. https://asj.basu.ac.ir/article_685.html.
Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheavens, J., Pulvers, K. M., Adams, V. H. III, & Wiklund, C. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 820–826. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.820.
Strout, T. D., Hillen, M., Gutheil, C., Anderson, E., Hutchinson, R., Ward, H., Kay, H., Mills, G. J., & Han, P. K. J. (2018). Tolerance of uncertainty: A systematic review of health and healthcare-related outcomes. Patient education and counseling, 101(9), 1518–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.030.
Waterman, Alan & Schwartz, Seth & Zamboanga, Byron & Ravert, Russell & Williams, Michelle & Agocha, V. & Kim, Su Yeong & Donnellan, M.. (2010). The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 5. 41-. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903435208.
Watson, A., and Brickson, S. (2019). Relationships between sport specialization, sleep, and subjective well-being in female adolescent athletes. Clin. J. Sport Med. 29, 384–390. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000631.
Yang, Y., & Xie, J. (2022). The Role of Ambiguity Tolerance and Enthusiasm on Chinese University Teac hers' Burnout. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 910598. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910598.
Zamani Sani, S. H., Fathirezaie, Z., & Abbaspour, K. (2019). Sport Emotion and Collective Efficacy among Healthy and Disabled Athletes. Sport Psychology Studies, 7(26), 31-44. HTTPS://SID.IR/PAPER/259966/EN