پیش‌بینی سلامت روان بر اساس راهبردهای مقابله دینی و خودکارآمدی در بیماران سرطانی تحت شیمی درمانی
محورهای موضوعی : سلامتسمیرا غلامی 1 , سهیلا آرانی شأنی 2
1 - - نویسنده مسئول، کارشناس ارشد، گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران farhad0874@gmail.com
2 - کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران، arani.2548@gmail.com
کلید واژه: خودکارآمدی, راهبردهای مقابله, سرطان, سلامت روان, شیمی درمانی, علائم جسمی و روانی,
چکیده مقاله :
چکیده: مقدمه: سرطان یکی از شایع‌ترین بیماری‌هایی است که امروز زندگی بشر را مورد تهدید جدی قرار داده است که علاوه بر علائم جسمی بر روی فرد موجب بروز علائم روانی می‌گردد و سلامت روان افراد را مورد تهدید قرار می‌دهد. پژوهش حاضر با هدف پیش‌بینی سلامت روان بر اساس راهبردهای مقابله دینی و خودکارآمدی در بیماران سرطانی تحت شیمی درمانی در سال 1399 انجام گرفت. روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر به لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نوع تحلیلی- همبستگی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی بیماران مبتلابه انواع سرطان که جهت انجام شیمی درمانی به مراکز شیمی درمانی شیراز در سال 1399 مراجعه کرده‌اند، بودند که به روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس تعداد 135 نفر از آنان انتخاب شد. ابزار پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه سلامت عمومی گلدبرگ (1997)، مقیاس مقابله مذهبی پارگامنت (2000) و مقیاس خودکارآمدی شرر (1982) بود. به‌منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از ضرایب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون گام به گام استفاده شد. یافته¬ها: بر اساس نتایج متغیرهای راهبرد مقابله دینی و خودکارآمدی قادر به پیش‌بینی تغییرات سلامت روان در بیماران سرطانی تحت شیمی درمانی بودند. همچنین از بین مؤلفه‌های راهبرد مقابل دینی، راهبرد مقابله دینی منفی دارای بیشترین تأثیر منفی در سلامت روان بیماران بود. نتیجه¬گیری: راهبردهای مقابله دینی و خودکارآمدی در سلامت روان بیماران سرطانی مؤثر هستند، از این جهت ارتقای این متغیرها در این بیماران پیشنهاد می¬شود.
Abstract Introduction: Cancer is one of the most common diseases that seriously threatens human life today, which causes psychological symptoms in addition to physical symptoms and threatens people's mental health. The present study was conducted with the aim of the prediction of mental health based on religious coping strategies and self-efficacy in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in 2019. Method: The current research is applied in terms of purpose and analytical-correlation type. The statistical population of the research included all the patients suffering from all types of cancer who referred to chemotherapy centers in Shiraz in 2019, and 135 of them were selected by available sampling method. The research tools included Goldberg’s General Health Questionnaire (1997), Pargament's Religious Coping Scale (2000), and Scherer's Self-Efficacy Scale (1982). In order to analyze the data, Pearson correlation coefficients and stepwise regression were used. Results: Based on the results, the variables of religious coping strategy and self-efficacy were able to predict mental health changes in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Also, among the components of the religious coping strategy, the negative religious coping strategy had the most negative effect on the patients' mental health. Conclusion: Religious coping strategies and self-efficacy are effective in the mental health of cancer patients; therefore, it is suggested to improve these variables in these patients
Resources:
1. Bahrami B, Bahrami A, Mashhadi A, Kareshki H. The role of cognitive emotion-regulation strategies in the quality of life of cancer patients. medical journal of mashhad university of medical sciences. 2015;58(2):96-105. D.O.I: 10.22038/MJMS.2015.4370 [IN PERSIAN]
2. Distefano M, Riccardi S, Capelli G, Costantini B, Petrillo M, Ricci C, et al. Quality of life and psychological distress in locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered pre-operative chemoradiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(1):144-50. D.O.I 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.034
3. Kugbey N, Meyer-Weitz A, Oppong Asante K. Access to health information, health literacy and health-related quality of life among women living with breast cancer: Depression and anxiety as mediators. Patient Education and Counseling. 2019;102(7):1357-63. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2019.02.014
4. Panahi A, Nakhaee Sistani R, Sadeghizadeh M. Evaluation of Apoptosis Induction on Gastric Cancer AGS Cells Made by Polymer Nano Curcumin. Journal of Police Medicine. 2012;1(3):200-7. http://jpmed.ir/ [in Persian]
5. El-Awady RA, Semreen MH, Saber-Ayad MM, Cyprian F, Menon V, Al-Tel TH. Modulation of DNA damage response and induction of apoptosis mediates synergism between doxorubicin and a new imidazopyridine derivative in breast and lung cancer cells. DNA Repair. 2016;37:1-11.
6. Roshaninejad M, Omrannasab M, Kamali P, Hassanzadeh M. Association between religious beliefs and mental health of students. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2001;13(25):28-35. URL: http://ijn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-249-en.html, [in Persian]
7. Mirghafourvand M, Farshbaf-Khalili A, Ghanbari-Homayi S. Marital Adjustment and Its Relationship with Religious Orientations Among Iranian Infertile and Fertile Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Religion and Health. 2019;58(3):965-76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45213926
8. Jalalian N, Geramipoor M, Borhali M. Investigating the mediating role of mental health in the relationship between Religious beliefs and organizational health (Case Study: public universities in Tehran). Counseling Culture and Psycotherapy. 2016;7(27):129-47. https://doi.org/10.22054/qccpc.2016.6787 [ in Pwersian]
9. Nabavi SS, Sohrabi F, Afrooz G, Delavar A, Hosseinian S. Relationship between self-efficacy and mental health among teachers:the role of perceived social support. rph. 2017;11(2):50-68. D.O.R. 20.1001.1.20080166.1396.11.2.1.5
10. Milioni M, Alessandri G, Eisenberg N, Castellani V, Zuffianò A, Vecchione M, et al. Reciprocal Relations Between Emotional Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Ego-Resiliency Across Time. J Pers. 2015;83(5):552-63. D.O.I: 10.1111/jopy.12131
11. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Worth Publishing Ltd; 1997.
12. Bandura A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006;1(2):164-80. DOI:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
13. Babapour J, Zeinali S, Zarezade F, Nejati B. The structural association of religious attitude and coping style with quality of life and fatigue in cancer patients. Journal of Health and Care. 2016;18(1):45-54. URL: http://hcjournal.arums.ac.ir/article-1-436-en.html
14. Khezerlou H, Akbari M, Jadidi H, Sinai B. Evaluating the effectıveness of a pain self-efficacy model on quality of life in patients with cancer. Journal of Health and Care. 2019;21(2):108-16. DOI:10.29252/jhc.21.2.108
15. Azimzadeh N, Bayazi MH, Shakerinasab M. The relationship between islamic coping methods and psychological well-being with adaptation and pain tolerance in patients with breast cancer. Quarterly Journal of Health Psychology. 2020;9(33):145-60. https://doi.org/10.30473/hpj.2020.48867.4584
16. Kershaw T, Ellis KR, Yoon H, Schafenacker A, Katapodi M, Northouse L. The interdependence of advanced cancer patients' and their family caregivers' mental health, physical health, and self-efficacy over time. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2015;49(6):901-11.
17. Harlianty R, Paramastri I. The role of religious coping as a moderator of the relationship between psychological burden and quality of life among caregiver of women with breast cancer. Journal of Psychological Perspective. 2020;2(2):71-8.
18. Milstein G, Palitsky R, Cuevas A. The religion variable in community health promotion and illness prevention. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community. 2020;48(1):1-6. DOI:10.47679/jopp.022.12200006
19. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, et al. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine. 1997;27(1):191-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291796004242
20. Thaghavi MR. Study of validity and reliability of Public Health Questionnaire. Psychological Journal. 2002;5(4):381-95. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256840200
21. Pargament KI, Koenig HG, Perez LM. The many methods of religious coping: development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2000;56(4):519-43. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:4<519::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-1
22. Motiei M, Nouhi S, Rezvani A. Study of the role of childhood trauma in predicting coping styles, identity and religious coping in adulthood. journal of Psychology new Ideas. 2022;11(15):1-13. URL: http://jnip.ir/article-1-639-en.html [in Persian]
23. Sherer M, Maddux JE, Mercandante B, Prentice-Dunn S, Jacobs B, Rogers RW. The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation. Psychological Reports. 1982;51(2):663-71. DOI:10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
24. Asgharnejad T, Ahmadi Dah Ghotbeddini M, Farzad V, Khodapanahi MK. Study of psychometric characteristics of Serer General Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Psychology. 2006;10(3):262-74.
25. Toloo Takmili Torabi N, Vakili P, Fattahi Andebil A. Presenting causal model in explaining the relationship between self-differentiation and forgiveness with marital satisfaction based on the mediating role of religious orientation. Journal of counseling research. 2021;20(78):80-107. 20.1001.1.23223065.1399.10.1.5.1
26. French DP. Self-efficacy and health. In: Wright JD, editor. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier; 2015: 509-14.
27. Usher EL, Morris DB. Self-efficacy. Reference module in neuroscience and biobehavioral psychology: Elsevier; 2022.
28. Schunk DH, DiBenedetto MK. Self-efficacy: Education aspects. In: Wright JD, editor. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition). Oxford: Elsevier; 2015: 515-21. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92019-1
