ارائه مدل کیفی از متغیرهای اثر گذار بر ارزش زیبایی شناسی منظر شهری (مورد پژوهی: شهر بابل)
محورهای موضوعی : معمار شهر
1 - دانشجوی دکتری ، گروه شهرسازی ، واحد تهران غرب ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، تهران ، ایران
کلید واژه: منظر شهر, زیبایی شناسی, هویت, روش داده بنیاد, مدل ,
چکیده مقاله :
از مناظر شهر و وصف طراحی آن در شهرهای امروزی می توان دریافت ، که همچنان در ارائه چارچوب هایی برای مولفه های طراحی منظر شهر ، دچار خلا نظری و عملیاتی می باشیم. با مطالعه سیر تکامل مفهوم منظر در بستر طراحی شهر، می توان فهمید، ارزش"زیبایی" و مفاهیم نهفته در آن در تمامی رویکرد ها نسبت به منظر، به نوعی قابل برداشت است. در تعاریف به روز از زیبایی، می گویند مفهومی است که باید توسط انسان، ادراک و تجربه شود و در خلال این تجربه روزمره است که ، فرآیند پاسخ گویی ، قضاوت ، ارزش گذاری و رفتار متقابل انسان نسبت به آن نیز شکل میگیرد. هدف مقاله، بررسی کیفی متغیرهای موثر بر طراحی منظر شهر با رویکرد زیبایی شناسی از نگاه مردم به عنوان کاربران اصلی محیط زندگی شان است. بدین منظور به روش داده بنیاد، با نمونه آماری 9 نفر از متخصصین و 41 نفر از شهروندان بابل، با مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته عمیق ، به گفت وشنود پرداخته و داده ها از طریق نرم افزار مکس کیودا 2023 ، تحلیل شد. مجموعا 1879 کد استخراج شد که در سه مرحله باز ، محوری و انتخابی طبقه بندی گردید و بر اساس قالب پارادایمی روش داده بنیاد که از 6 تم اصلی شامل پدیده محوری ، عوامل علی ، زمینه ای ، مداخله گر ، راهبرد ها و پیامدها تشکیل شده است، مدل کیفی مقاله به دست آمد. پیامد ها ، در مدل فوق همان دستاورد پژوهش هست که شامل "برونداد پدیده منظر بر روی مردم" ، بر خود "منظر شهر" و بر روی "هویت" می باشد.
By studying the evolution of the concept of landscape in the context of urban design, it can be understood that the value of "beauty" and the concepts hidden in it, turn beauty into a turning point in all approaches to The view is somehow understandable. In the modern definitions of beauty, they say that it is a concept that must be perceived and experienced by humans, and it is during this daily experience that the process of answering, judging, valuing and interacting with it is also formed. The aim of the article is to qualitatively investigate the variables affecting the design of the urban landscape with an aesthetic approach from the perspective of people as the main users of their living environment. For this purpose, with a statistical sample of 9 experts and 41 citizens of Babol city, with a semi-structured in-depth interview, the data was analyzed through the MAXQDA 2023 software. A total of 1879 codes were extracted, which were classified into three stages, open, central, and selective, and based on the paradigmatic format of the grounded theory method, which consists of 6 main themes, including the central phenomenon, causal factors, contextual factors, intervening factors, strategies, and consequences. , the qualitative model of the article was obtained. The consequences, in the above model, are the results of the research, which include "the output of the urban landscape phenomenon on people", on the "urban landscape" itself, and on "identity".
Acar, C. Acar, H. & Eroglu, E. (2007). Evaluation of ornamental plant resources to urban biodiversity and cultural changing: A case study of residential landscapes in Trabzon city .Turkey: Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.08.030
Ahmadi Mirghaed, F. Mohammadzadeh, M. Salmanmahiny, A. & Mirkarimi, S.H. (2020). Assessing the interactions between landscape aesthetic quality and spatial indices in Gharasoo watershed, North of Iran. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 17, 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02342-2
Al-Ghiyadh M. A. K. & Al-Khafaji S. J. N. (2021). The Role of Urban Planning and Urban Design on Safe Cities. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1058, No. 1, p. 012065). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757- 899X/1058/1/012065.
Aminzadeh, B. (2016). Values in urban landscape design. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (in Persian)
Aminzadeh, B. (2011). Evaluation of aesthetics and place identity. Tehran: hoviateshahr. (in Persian)
Atik, M. Canay Işıklı, R. Ortaçeşme, V. & Yıldırım, E. (2017). “Exploring a Combination of Objective and Subjective Assessment in Landscape Classification: Side Case from Turkey.” Applied Geography 83 (June): 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.004
Attar Sahragard, F., Danehkar, A., & Jahani, A. (2024). Modeling landscape visual aesthetic quality assessment towards tourism development in protected areas. Environmental Sciences, 22(1), 123-144. doi: 10.48308/envs.2024.1335
Blaikie, N. (2016). Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. )H. Chavoshian, Trans). Tehran: Ney. (Original work published 2000). (in Persian)
Charmaz, K. & Thornberg, R. (2021) . The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2021, VOL. 18, NO. 3, 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1780357
Chun Tie, Y. Birks, M. & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE open medicine, 7. doi:10.1177/2050312118822927
Cheng, X., Damme, S.V., Li, L., & Uyttenhove, P. (2019). Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: A review of methods. Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2013). Principles of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Development Methods and Procedures.(M. Esmaili et al, Trans).Tehran: Andisheh Rafi. (in Persian)
Cumming T. L. Shackleton R. T. Förster J. Dini J. Khan A. Gumula, M. & Kubiszewski, I. (2017). Achieving the national development agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through investment in ecological infrastructure: A case study of South Africa. Ecosystem Services, 27(May), 253–260.https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecoser.2017.05.005.
Daniel, T.C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4.
Dabbagh, E. & Dabbagh, P. (2022). The Role of Management and Planning in Urban Landscape Aestethic: A Literature Review. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2022 Vol. 7, Issue 7, ISSN No. 2455-2143, Pages 22-28. https://www.ijeast.com/papers/22-28,%20Tesma0707,IJEAST.pdf
Dearden, P. (1987). Consensus and a Theoretical Framework for Landscape Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management 24 (January): 267–278. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258725135_Dearden_P_1987_Consensus_and_a_theoretical_framework_for_landscape_evaluation_Journal_of_Environmental_Management_24_267-278
Dramstad, W. E. Tveit, M. S. Fjellstad, W. J. & Fry, G. L. (2006). Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and urban planning, 78(4), 465-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.006
de Val, G. D. L. F. Atauri, J. A. & de Lucio, J. V. (2006). Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes. Landscape and urban planning, 77(4), 393-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.05.003
Ebner, M., Schirpke, U., & Tappeiner, U. (2022). Combining multiple socio-cultural approaches–Deeper insights into cultural ecosystem services of mountain lakes? Landscape and Urban Planning, 228, 104549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104549
Ervin H. Zube, E.H. Sell, J.L. & Taylor, J.G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory, Landscape Planning, Volume 9, Issue 1, 1982, Pages 1-33, ISSN 0304-3924, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0.
Frank, S., Fürst,C. Koschke, L. Witt, A. & Makeschin, F. (2013). Assessment of Landscape Aesthetics—Validation of a Landscape Metrics-Based Assessment by Visual Estimation of the Scenic Beauty. Ecological Indicators 32 (September): 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.026
Gemici, RO. & Polat, AT. (2023). Investigation of the Effect of Urban Identity on Urban Landscape Design with Eye Tracking Technique in the Case of Konya City. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 37(2), 337-353. https://doi.org/10. 15316/SJAFS.2023.033
Gobster, P.H., Ribe, R.G. & Palmer, J.F. (2019). Themes and trends in visual assessment research: Introduction to the Landscape and Urban Planning special collection on the visual assessment of landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191, 103635.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019. 103635.
Grote, L. Wang. D. (2013). Architectural Research methods. )A. Einifar, Trans). Tehran: University of Tehran Press. (Original work published 2002) (in Persian)
Gülçin, D., & Yalçınkaya, N. M. (2022). Correlating fluency theory-based visual aesthetic liking of landscape with landscape types and features. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 27(1), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2022.2125836
Guzmán, A. I. (2017). Geographical Aesthetics: Imagining Space, Staging Encounters Edited by Harriet Hawkins and Elizabeth Straughan. Visual Studies 32 (2): 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2016.1274190.
Howley, P., (2011). Landscape aesthetics: Assessing the general publics' preferences towards rural landscapes. Ecological Economics, 72, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.026
Kalivoda, O., J. Vojar, Z. Skřivanová, & Zahradník, D. (2014). Consensus in Landscape Preference Judgments: The Effects of Landscape Visual Aesthetic Quality and Respondents’ Characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management 137 (May): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009
Karasov, O., Avelino Batista Vieira, A. Külvik, M. & I. Chervanyov. (2020). Landscape Coherence Revisited: GIS-Based Mapping in Relation to Scenic Values and Preferences Estimated with Geolocated Social Media Data. Ecological Indicators 111 (April): 105973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105973
Kerebel, A., Gélinas, N. Déry, S.Voigt, B. & A. Munson. (2019). Landscape Aesthetic Modelling Using Bayesian Networks: Conceptual Framework and Participatory Indicator Weighting. Landscape and Urban Planning 185 (May): 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.001
Keshtkaran, R., Habibi, A., & Sharif, H.R. (2017). Aesthetic Preferences for Visual Quality of Urban Landscape in Derak High-Rise Buildings (Shiraz). Journal of Sustainable Development, 10, 94. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v10n5p94
Khaki, Gh. (2013). Grounded research method with thesis writing approach. Tehran:Fujan. (in Persian)
Lazarev, L. (2022). Urban Landscape: Aesthetic and Identity Valences. In: Învățământul artistic – dimensiuni culturale, 15 aprilie 2022, Chişinău. Chișinău, Republica Moldova: "Notograf Prim" SRL, 2022, pp. 157-162. ISBN 978-9975-84-176-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55383/iadc2022.30.
Lothian, A. (1999). Landscape and the Philosophy of Aesthetics: Is Landscape Quality Inherent in the Landscape or in the Eye of the Beholder? Landscape and Urban Planning 44 (4): 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00019-5
Mansouri, MA. (2023). Tehran: Confrontation with aesthetics? Tehran: Eastern Art and Civilization.11(39).2023. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jaco.2023.390833.1306
Mansouri, M. A., & Shad Ghazvini, P. (2022). The Aesthetic Experience of Urban Art Analysis of four experiences in Tehran based on the John Dewey's Valuation Theory. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 15(39), 139-150. (in Persian). https://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_158070.html?lang=en
Markovic, S. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: Aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. I-Percept. 2012, 3, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0450aap
Mundher, Riyadh, Shamsul Abu Bakar, Suhardi Maulan, Mohd Johari Mohd Yusof, Ammar Al-Sharaa, Azlizam Aziz, & Hangyu Gao .(2022). Aesthetic Quality Assessment of Landscapes as a Model for Urban Forest Areas: A Systematic Literature Review. Forests 13, no. 7: 991.https://doi.org/10.3390/f13070991
Naseri, S. & Bou Alizadeh, N. (2024). Nature in the murals on Vali-E-Asr Street in Tehran Influenced by the identity of the environment or a purely decorative attitude? Evaluating the relationships between the presence and position of nature with the identity of the environment in the murals’context.Tehran:Manzar.16(66).64-69.(in Persian). DOI: 10.22034/MANZAR.2023.403135.2250
Nijhuis, S., Van Lammeren, R., & van der Hoeven, F. (2011). Exploring the visual landscape: advances in physiognomic landscape research in the Netherlands (Vol. 2). TU Delft. http://dx.doi.org/10.7480/rius.2
Nohl,W. (2001). Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception-preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 54, 223–237.
Norberg- Schulz, C. (1981) .Genuis Loci. New York: Rizzoli. (in Persian)
Packer-Muti, B. (2009). A Review of Corbin and Strauss’ Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. The Qualitative Report, 14(2), 140-143. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2009.2838
Page, J. (2022). Aesthetic Understanding. Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 59 (1):48-68. https://philpapers.org/rec/PAGAU
Pakzad, J (2013). An intellectual history of urbanism. Tehran: Armanshahr.(Original work published 2010) (in Persian)
Pakzad, J., & Saki, E. (2014). Aesthetic Experience of Built Environment. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 19(3), 5-14. (in Persian) https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2014.55399
Plieninger, T., D. van der Horst, C. Schleyer, and C. Bieling. (2014). Sustaining ecosystem services in cultural landscapes. Ecology and Society 19(2): 59.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06159-190259
Purici Ş., & Mareci Sabol H. (2022). From Beautification to Ennobling: The Exterior Mural Mosaics from Suceava of the Socialist Era. Societies, 12(4),107.https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12040107
Rahimi, M., Behmai, L., & Barkat, G. H. (2023). Designing A Paradigmatic Model of Barriers to Innovation Management in Ahvaz Primary Schools. International Journal of Innovation Management and Organizational Behavior, 3(4), 19-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijimob.3.4.3
Ryan, B. D. (2007). Book Review: Cuthbert, Alexander. 2006. The Form of Cities: Political Economy and Urban Design. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell. 328 pp. $84.95 hardcover, ISBN 1-40511-639-0. $36.95 paperback, ISBN 1-40511-640-4. Journal of Planning Literature, 22(2), 125-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412207306620
Sack, R,D. (1997).Homo geographics: A framework for action, awareness and moral concern. Baltimore,MD: John Hopkins University Press. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/3477731
Schirpke, U., Mölk, F., Feilhauer, E., Tappeiner, U., & Tappeiner, G. (2023). How suitable are discrete choice experiments based on landscape indicators for estimating landscape preferences?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 237, 104813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104813
Shieh, E., Behzadfar, M., & Namdarian, A. A. (2017). Theoretical framework Codification for urban scape using “the production of space” theory and influential forces on scape. Motaleate Shahri, 6(24), 81-94. (in Persian)
Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a Social Psychology of Place: Predicting Behavior from Place-Based Cognitions, Attitude, and Identity. Environment and Behavior, 34(5), 561-581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001
Swaffield, S. R., & McWilliam, W.J. (2014). Landscape Aesthetic Experience and Ecosystem Services. In Ecosystem Services in New Zealand — Conditions and Trends, edited by J. R. Dymond. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press. http://www.mwpress.co.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/77052/2_6_Swaffield.pdf
Tamrchi F, Asadpoor E, & Zahrakar K. (2022) . Presenting a paradigmatic model of underlying factors result in marital infidelity based on grounded theory. J of Psychological Science. 2022; 20(107): 2027-2043. URL: https://psychologicalscience.ir/article-1-1074-fa.html
Tveit, M.S., (2009). Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. Journal of Environmental Management. 90(9), 2882-2888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.021.
Tribot, A.-S., Deter, J. & Mouquet, N. (2018). Integrating the Aesthetic Value of Landscapes and Biological Diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285 (1886): 20180971. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0971.
Van Berkel, D. B., & Verburg. P. H. (2014). Spatial Quantification and Valuation of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Agricultural Landscape. Ecological Indicators 37 (February): 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025.
Wang, R., J. Zhao, & Z. Liu. (2016). Consensus in Visual Preferences: The Effects of Aesthetic Quality and Landscape Types. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20 (December): 210–217. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.005.
Williams, A.T. (2019). The Concept of Scenic Beauty in a Landscape. In: Rangel-Buitrago, N. (eds) Coastal Scenery. Coastal Research Library, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78878-4_2
Zhu Y & Du R .(2024). Evaluating the impact of urban landscape elements on the sense of security and local belonging-case study: Tongdejie, China. Front. Environ. Sci., Volume 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1340394
Zhu, Z. He, Q. & Zhu, X. (2022). Spatial Analysis for the Landscape Visual Aesthetic Quality of Urban Residential Districts Based on 3D City Modeling. Sustainability 2022, 14(18), 11500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811500
