Effects of Phenological Stages on Yield and Quality Traits in 22 Populations of Tall Wheatgrass Agropyron elongatum Grown in Lorestan, Iran
محورهای موضوعی : Relationship between Animal and RangelandA. A. Jafari 1 , H. Anvari 2 , H. Nakhjavan 3 , E. Rahmani 4
1 - Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, Iran
2 - Islamic Azad University, Borujerd Branch, Iran
3 - Islamic Azad University, Borujerd Branch, Iran
4 - Research Center of Agricultural and Natural Resources, Lorestan, Iran
کلید واژه: Yield, Phenological Stages, digestibility, Tall wheatgrass, Agropyron elongatum, Carbohydrates,
چکیده مقاله :
The objective of this research was to study the effects of phenological stages on yield and quality traits in 22 populations of tall wheatgrass Agropyron elongatum. A split plot design was conducted using a complete randomized block with two replications in Lorestan (Borujerd), Iran during 2007-2008. The genotypes were cut in five maturity stages as vegetation, stem elongation, heading date, anthesis, milky development and dough seed stage as main plots. Data were collected and analyzed for DM yield, stem number, plant height and three quality traits as; dry matter digestibility (DMD), water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein (CP). The results showed the significant effects of phonological stages, genotypes and genotypes×phonology interaction effects for all of traits except stem number. The stem elongation and dough seed stages with average values of 2.58 and 5.08 Kg/ha had the lowest and highest yield production, respectively. In contrast, the average values of DMD and CP were high in both vegetation and stem elongation stages and they dramatically decreased in mature hay by 13% and 35% lower than those of vegetation hay, respectively. For WSC, the highest values (14.3 and 14.4%) were obtained in heading and pollination stages. Based on both yield and quality traits, it concluded that heading and pollination stages were the best stage for harvesting maximum DM yield couple with three quality traits DMD, WSC and CP yields in tall wheatgrass under conservation management. In comparison among genotypes, 301P10 (Alborz), 301M2 (Alborz) and 1599P10 (Gorgan), 1599P4 (Gorgan) 774M (Takestan) and 1755P9 (Ormia) with the range of 4.03 and 4.98 ton/ha had the higher forage production. Among them, 1599P10 (Gorgan), 774M (Takestan) and 1755P9 (Ormia) were recognized as the best genotypes for both yield and quality trait.
Anonymous, 1999. The rangelands
of IRAN, Proceeding of IRAN-UNEPFAO Initiative. Low forest cover country
(LFCC) meeting 4-8 Oct. Tehran, Iran.
Berdahl, J. D., Karn, J. F. and Dara, S. T.
1994. Quantitative inheritance of forage
quality traits in intermediate wheatgrass.
J. Crop Science. 34: 423-427.
Breese, E. L. and Thomas, A. C. 1967. In
vitro digestibility in cocksfoot. Report of
the Welsh Plant Breeding Station for
1966, UK. pages 35-41.
Buxton, D. R. and Casler, M. D. 1993.
Environmental and genetic effects on cell
wall composition and digestibility. In:
“Forage cell wall structure and
digestibility” (eds. Jung, et al.), ASA,
CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, USA, pages
685-714.
Buxton, D. R., Mertens, D. R. and Fisher,
D. S. 1996. Forage quality and ruminant
utilisation. In: “Cool-season forage
grasses” (eds. Moser et al.) ASA, CSSA,
and SSSA, Madison, USA, pages 229-
266.
Cohen, R. D. H., J. A. Kernan, K. A.
Cruise, E. C. Coxworth, and G. E.
This is trial version
www.adultpdf.com
16 / J. of Rang. Sci., 2010, Vol. 1, No. 1 Effects of Phenological Stages …
Knipfel. 1991. The effect of
ammoniation of the nutritive value of tall
wheatgrass. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71: 867-
870.
Darbyshire, S.J. 1997. Tall wheatgrass,
Elymus elongates subsp. ponticus, in
Nova Scotia. Rodera 99:161-165.
Hoffman, P.C., K.M. Lundberg, L.M.
Bauman and R.D. Shaver. 2003. The
effect of maturity on NDF digestibility.
Focus on Forage, 5: 1-3.
IRIMO. 2006. Data processing center, Iran
Meteorological Organization Publication.
Jafari, A., Connolly, V. and Walsh, E. J.
2003a. Genetic analysis of yield and
quality in full sib families of perennial
ryegrass (Lolium perenne L) under two
cutting managements. Irish Journal of
Agricultural and Food Research. 42,
275–292.
Jafari, A. V. Connolly, A. Frolich and E.K.
Walsh. 2003b. A note on estimation of
quality in perennial ryegrass by near
infrared spectroscopy. Irish journal of
agricultural and food research. 42:293-
299.
Jafari, A and H.Naseri. 2007. Genetic
variation and correlation among yield
and quality traits in cocksfoot (Dactylis
glomerata L.). Journal of Agricultural
Science Cambridge 145: 1–12.
Jafari, A., H.Setavarz and M.A. Alizadeh.
2007. Genetic variation and correlation
among seed yield and seed components
in parents and half sib families of tall
fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.),
Journal of New Seeds, 8: 47 – 65.
Marten, G. C. 1989. Breeding forage
grasses to maximize animal performance.
In: “Contributions from breeding forage
and turf grasses” (eds. Sleper et al.),
CSSA special publication No 15, pages
71-104. USA.
McGrath, D. 1988. Seasonal variation in
the water-soluble carbohydrates of
perennial and Italian ryegrass under
cutting conditions.. Irish Jour. Agric.
Food. Res. 27: 131-139.
Rezaeifard, M., A. A. Jafari and M. H.
Assareh. 2010. Effects of phenological
stages on forage yield quality traits in
cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata). Journal
of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 8:
365-369.
SAS Manual Software. 2004. Copyright (c)
2002-2003 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary,
NC, USA.
Undersander, D.J. and C.H. Naylor. 1987.
Influence of clipping frequency on
herbage yield and nutrient content of tall
wheatgrass. J. Range Manage. 40:31-35.
USDA ARS. 2005. Intermountain planting
guide. Publication No. AG 510. Forage
and range research Lab, Logan, Utah,
and Utah State University Extension. 107
pp.
Walters, R. J. K. 1984. D-Value: The
significance of small differences on
animal performance. Proceeding of the
18th NIAB Crop Conference e 12-13
December 1984, Cambridge, UK, pages
60-68.
Wilkins, P. W. and Lovatt, J. A. 1989.
Genetic improvement of yield of
nitrogen of Lolium perenne pastures.
Euphytica 43: 259-262.
