Comparative Analysis of Economic Efficiency between Low and High External Input Technology Agriculture in a Harsh Macroeconomic Environment of Imo State, Nigeria
محورهای موضوعی : Environmental policy and management
1 - Department of Agricultural Economics & Extension, Rivers State University of Education, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
کلید واژه: economic efficiency, Low External Input Technology, High External Input Technology, Macroeconomic Environment,
چکیده مقاله :
The study compared economic efficiency among smallholder farmers who practiced low external input technology [LEIT] and high external input technology [HEIT] agriculture in a harsh macroeconomic environment typified by inadequate fertilizer subsidy in Imo State, Nigeria. Cross sectional data generated from 160 smallholder farmers randomly selected from 2 out of the 3 agricultural zones in Imo State were used. Profit function was used in analyzing the data. Results showed that the LEIT farmers achieved higher level of economic efficiency relative to their HEIT counterparts, although the difference is statistically non significant. It is therefore recommended that in the face of escalating costs of fertilizer, organic manure could be used. Appropriate policies should be put in place by the government to encourage livestock rearing so as to effectively utilize their bye product-organic manure. Household refuse or bio-degradable from the cities could be channeled to farms to serve as organic manure.
The study compared economic efficiency among smallholder farmers who practiced low external input technology [LEIT] and high external input technology [HEIT] agriculture in a harsh macroeconomic environment typified by inadequate fertilizer subsidy in Imo State, Nigeria. Cross sectional data generated from 160 smallholder farmers randomly selected from 2 out of the 3 agricultural zones in Imo State were used. Profit function was used in analyzing the data. Results showed that the LEIT farmers achieved higher level of economic efficiency relative to their HEIT counterparts, although the difference is statistically non significant. It is therefore recommended that in the face of escalating costs of fertilizer, organic manure could be used. Appropriate policies should be put in place by the government to encourage livestock rearing so as to effectively utilize their bye product-organic manure. Household refuse or bio-degradable from the cities could be channeled to farms to serve as organic manure.
| 1- Anyanwu, S.O. (2009f) Gender and RelativeTechnical Efficiency among Low External InputTechnology Farms in Food Crop Production in ImoState Acta Agronomica Nigeriana, Vol.9, No.1&2,pp.41-48. | ||||
| 2- Anyanwu, S. O. (2010) Comparative Analysis ofProductivity and Efficiency in Low and High ExternalInput Technology Agriculture in Imo StateUnpublished PhD Thesis, Federal University ofTechnology, Owerri, Nigeria. | ||||
| 3- Anyanwu, S.O., Ibekwe, U.C. (2010) Farm Labourand its Productivity in Low and High External InputTechnology Agriculture in Nigeria Journal for AppliedResearch, Vol.1, No. 1, pp.22-27. | ||||
| 4- Anyanwu, S.O.and P.C. Obasi (2010a) ComparativeAnalysis of Land Productivities in Lowand High External Input Technology Agriculture inImo State, Nigeria Acta Agronomica Nigeriana,Vol.10, No.1, pp.15-20. | ||||
| 5- Anyanwu, S.O. and P.C. Obasi (2010b) ComparativeAnalysis of Aggregate Agricultural Productivitybetween Low and High External Input TechnologyFarms in Nigeria African Journal of Bio-technology(Kenya), Vol.9, No.34, pp.5530-5534 | ||||
| 6- Anyanwu, S.O. and O.M. Adesope (2010a) LowExternal Input Technology Agriculture and RuralDevelopment in Nigeria New York Science Journal,Vol. 3, No. 11, pp.65-70. | ||||
| 7- Anyanwu, S.O & Adesope, O.M. (2010b) IndigenousKnowledge and Modern Intensive Agriculturein a Harsh Macroeconomic Environment of ImoState Paper presented at the 5th Annual Conferenceand General Meeting of the Nigerian Society forIndigenous Knowledge and Development (NSIKAD)held at Ayaro Hall, Ididie Hotel, Yenagoa, BayelsaState, November. 3rd -6th, (2010). | ||||
| 8- Central Bank of Nigeria (2002) Annual Reportand Statement of Accounts for the Year ended 31stDecember. | ||||
| 9- Central Bank of Nigeria (2003) ContemporaryEconomic Policy Issues in Nigeria. In Nnanna, O.J.,Alade, S.O and Odoko, F. O. (eds). Kas Arts Services,Nigeria. | ||||
| 10- Crosson, P. and J.R. Anderson, (2002) Technologiesfor Meeting Future Global Demand for Food. DiscussionPaper 02 – 02. Resources for the Future,1616p Street, NW, Washington D.C. | ||||
| 11- De Jager A.; M. Nanduwa, and P.F.Okot, (1998)Monitoring Nutrient Flows and Economic Performancein African Farming Systems (NUTMON) Conceptsand Methodologies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.71, 37 – 48. | ||||
| 12- De Jager A.; D. Onduyra, V. Wijk, M.S. Viaming,J.Abad G.N.Gachin, (2001) Assessing Sustainabilityof Low External Input Farm Management Systemswith the Nutrient Monitoring Approach: a CaseStudy in Kenya Agric. Syst. 69, 99- 118 | ||||
| 13- Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development[FMARD], (2006), National Programmefor Food Security, Expansion Phase Project 2006-(2010) [Main Report]. | ||||
| 14- Graves, A., R. Matthews and K. Waldie (2004)Low External Input Technologies for LivelihoodImprovement in Subsistence Agriculture. Instituteof Water and Environment, Cranfield UniversitySisloe Bedfordshire United Kingdom. | ||||
| 15- Harsch, E. (2004) Agricuture, Africa's EngineFor Growth. Small Scale Farmer Holds the KeysSays NEPAD. Plan Africa Recovery 17(4) | ||||
| 16- Imahe, O.J. and R.A. Alibi (2005) The Determinantsof Agricultural Productivity in Nigeria Journalof Food Agriculture and Environment. Vol. 3 | ||||
| 17- Lau, L.T. and P.H. Yotopoulos (1971) A Test forRelative Efficiency and Application to Indian AgricultureAmerican Economic Review, Vol.Lxi No.1pp94-109. | ||||
| 18- Lau, L.T. and P.H. Yotopoulos (1972) ProfitSupply and Factor Demand FunctionsAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol.54 No. 1 pp11-18. | ||||
| 19- Mann, C. (1997) Reseeding the Green Revolution.Science 227 (August), 1038-1043. | ||||
| 20- National Population Commission (2006) PopulationCensus of Nigeria, Government Press, Abuja,Nigeria. | ||||
| 21- Obasi, P.C. (1995) Relative Production Efficiencyof Credit and Non Credit Users among Farmers inImo State, Nigeria Modelling, Measurement &Control .D AMSE Press, Vol.12, No.2 . pp14-31. | ||||
| 22- Ohajianya, D.O. and D.O.Onu (2004) Economicsof Fertilizer Use in Vegetable Production in NigeriaTrop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol.81. No. 4, pp 253-258. | ||||
| 23- Onyenweaku, C.E. and Y.L. Fabiyi (1991)Relative Efficiency of Cooperative and IndividualFarmers in Food Production in Imo State, Nigeria,AMSE Transactions, Vol. 8 (4) Pp. 23-32 | ||||
| 24- Pieri, C. (1995) Long Term Soil ManagementExperiments in Semi-Arid Franco Phone Africa. InSoil Management Experimental Basis for SustainabilityAnd Environmental Quality. Advances InSoil Science (R. Lal And B.A. Stewart. Eds.) Pp.225-266. CRC.Lewis. | ||||
| 25- Pretty, J. (1995) Regenerating Agriculture Policesand Practices for Sustainability and Self-Reliance.P. 336. Earthscan London. | ||||
| 26- Pretty, J. (2002) Agri-Culture: ReconnectingPeople, Land and Nature, London, Earthscan. | ||||
| 27- Reardon, T. V. E. Kelly; T. Crawford, K. SavadogoAnd D. Clay (1997) Determinants of Farm Productivityin Africa: A Synthesis of four Case Studies.Technical Paper No.75, SD Publication Services.Office of Sustainable Development Bureau forAfrica. U.S. Agency for International DevelopmentUSAID. Pp1-42. | ||||
| 28- Smil, V. (2000) Feeding the World: A Challengefor the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA, MITPress. | ||||
| 29- Snapp, S..S., P.L. Matongoya, And S. Washington,(1998) Organic Matter Technologies for the IntegratedNutrient Management in Small HolderCropping Systems Of Southern Africa. Agric.cosyst. Environ. 71, 185-200. | ||||
| 30- Tripp, Robert (2006a) Is Low External InputTechnology Contributing to Sustainable AgriculturalDevelopment? Natural Resource perspective 102.ODI (Oversea Development Institute), UK pp.1-4 | ||||
| 31- Ugwu, D.S. [2009] Problems and Prospects ofCommercial Small and Medium Scale Cocoa andOil Palm Production in Cross River State, Nigeria.Journ. of Applied Sciences Research, 5[7]: 827-832. | ||||
| 32- World Development Report, (2003) TransformingInstitutions on Agricultural Land.World Bank andOxford University Press. New York. | ||||
