بررسی نگرش کتابداران کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان مازندران به مدیریت دانش
محورهای موضوعی : دانش شناسی
حسن صیامیان
1
(استادیار گروه فناوری اطلاعات سلامت، دانشکده پیراپزشکی ساری- دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مازندران)
افسانه شهرابی
2
(کارشناس ارشد- کتابخانه مرکزی دانشکده پزشکی ساری- دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مازندران)
فهیمه باب الحوائجی
3
(دانشیار گروه علم اطلاعات و دانش‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.)
کلید واژه: مدیریت دانش, مازندران, کتابخانه عمومی, کتابدار, اشتراک دانش,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: هدف مطالعه حاضر، بررسی نگرش کتابداران کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان مازندران به مدیریت دانش است. روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر از نوع کاربردی است و در اجرای آن از روش تحقیق پیمایشی - تحلیلی استفاده شده است. کتابداران رسمی و پیمانی کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان مازنداران 110 (نفر) کل جامعه پژوهش را تشکیل می‌دهند. این تحقیق در سال 1389 با ابزار پرسش‌نامه نگرش به مدیریت دانش و اشتراک دانش سنجیده است. یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که بین نگرش به مدیریت دانش کتابداران کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان مازندران با اشتراک دانش رابطه وجود دارد. بین اعتماد کتابداران کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان مازندران و همکاری آنان در اشتراک دانش رابطه وجود دارد. بین گشاده رویی کتابداران کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان مازندران با همکاری آنان در اشتراک دانش رابطه وجود دارد. بین سیستم‌های پاداش در کتابخانه‌های عمومی استان مازندران و همکاری کتابداران در اشتراک دانش رابطه وجود دارد. نتیجه گیری: نتایج پژوهش حاضر بر اهمیت توجه به توسعه همکاری بیشتر بین کتابداران برای ارتقاء مدیریت دانش، همکاری و اشتراک دانش تأکید دارد.
Purpose: the purpose of this study is to measure Mazandaran Province public librarians' attitudes toward knowledge management including trust, reward system, openness, cooperation, and knowledge sharing Methodology: The study is an applied research, and survey method is used. 110 librarians of Mazandaran Public libraries took part in this survey. The research measured viewpoints of librarians in 9 months during 2010-2011. Questionnaires 'Cronbach's Alpha about confidence, attitude, cooperation, and reward, and openness in communication was 73%, and about attitude and knowledge management was87 % .SPSS v.17 is used in this study. In the analysis Pearson correlation coefficient R for testing hypotheses is used. Findings:Results showed that there is a meaningful relation among correlations across the variables of attitudes to knowledge management, trust, openness, and reward of librarians of public libraries of Mazandaran province and knowledge sharing. Conclusion: This study emphasizes the importance of greater cooperation between librarians for promoting the development of knowledge management, collaboration, and knowledge
Al-Hawamdeh, Suliman. (2002). Knowledge management: re-thinking information management and facing the challenge of managing tacit knowledge. Information Research, 8(1), 8-1.
Choo, Chun Wei, & Bontis, Nick. (2002). The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge: Oxford University Press.
Davenport, Thomas H. (1998). Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard business review, 76(4).
Davenport, Thomas H, & Pruzak, Laurence. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know: Harvard Business Press.
Drucker, Peter Ferdinand. (1988). The coming of the new organization. Harvard Business Review
Earl, Michael. (2001). Knowledge management strategies: toward a taxonomy. J. of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 215-242.
Hassan Larijani, H, & Noori, Asl. (2009). Feasibility of knowledge management presentation in public libraries of east Azarbayjan. Epistemiology, 2(25), 73-80. [in Persian].
Holm, Jeanne. (2001). Capturing the spirit of knowledge management.
Husted, K., Minbaeva, D. , & Michailova, S. (2005). Knowledge sharing and organizational performance: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motives. Paper presented at the 8th International Human Resource
Ipe, Minu. (2003). Knowledge sharing in organizations: a conceptual framework. Human Resource Development Review, 2(4), 337-359.
Kang, Ming, & Kim, Yeongho. (1999). Development of knowledge flow diagram for intraorganizational knowledge-sharing enhancement. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the conference of Korea society of management information System.
Kazemi Joghatab, H. (2001). Role of trust in scientific organizations and some of effective factors on it Tabriz University, Tabriz. [in Persian].
Khatamian Far, P., & Parirokh, M. (2009). A Survey Research On Knowledge Sharing Repositories In Astan Quds Library Organization And Its Compatibility With Nonaka & Takeuchi Model For Knowledge Sharing. Library And Information Science, 12(1), 223-246 [in Persian].
Koenig, S. A., Dobson, P., Longin, E., Michalec, D., Gerstner, T., & Taylor, J. (2007). Internet-based knowledge management database for children and adults with epilepsy: a possible model project for evidence-based medicine in the future. Seizure, 16(8), 703-708.
Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annu Rev Psychol, 50, 569-598.
Kwok, Sai Ho, & Gao, Sheng. (2005). Attitude towards knowledge sharing behavior. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(2).
Lajvardi, SJ, & Khanbabaei, A. (2006). The survey of facilitator factors of knowledge management in working groups: case study in Agricultural Bank. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 97 [in Persian].
Liebowitz, J. (1999). Key ingredients to the success of an organization’s knowledge management strategy. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(1), 37-40.
Lin, H. . (2006). Impact of organizational support on organizational intention to facilitate knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(1), 26-35.
Lu, L., Leung, K., & Koch, P. . (2006. ). Managerial knowledge sharing: The role of individual, interpersonal, and organizational factors. Management and Organization Review, 2(1), 15-41.
Nonaka, Ikujiro, & Takeuchi, Hirotaka. (1996). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 592.
O’Dell, Carla, & Grayson, C Jackson. (1998). If only we knew what we know. California management review, 40(3), 154-174.
Parirokh, M, & Khatamian Far, P. (2006). The role and function of organizational culture and leadership in enhancing knowledge sharing among reference librarians in academic libraries: a case study Studies in education. psychology, 7(1), 105-127. [in Persian].
Parirokh, M, & Khatamian, P. (2008). How implementation of knowledge management can make a difference in libraries: a case study of KM practice in Astan Quds Library Organization. Paper presented at the World Congress of Muslim Librarian & Information Scientists 25th -27th November 2008 Putra World Trade Center.
Parirokh, M.; Daneshgar, F., & Fattahi, R. (2008). Identifying knowledge-sharing requirements in academic libraries. Library review, 57(2), 107-122.
Parirokh, Mehri, & Khatamianfar, P. (2008). A Survey Research on Knowledge Sharing Repositories in Astan Quds Library Organization and its Compatibility with Nonaka & Takeuchi Model for Knowledge Sharing Library And Information Science Winter, 10((4) 40), 177-212. [in Persian].
Petrash, Gordon. (1996). Managing knowledge assets for value. Paper presented at the Knowledge-Based Leadership Conference.
Prahalad, Coimbatore K, & Hamel, Gary. (2006). The core competence of the corporation Strategische Unternehmungsplanung—Strategische Unternehmungsführung (pp. 275-292): Springer.
Rahnavard, F.A, & Khavandkar, J. (2009). The impact of knowledge sharing onThe success in outsourcing IT services. Information Technology Management, 1, 49-64. [in Persian].
Sallis, Edward J, & Jones, Gary. (2002). Knowledge management in education: enhancing learning & education: Psychology Press.
Seonghee, Kim, & Boryung, Ju. (2008). An analysis of faculty perceptions: Attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic institution. Library & Information Science Research, 30(4), 282-290.
Skyrme, D. (1997). Knowledge management: making sense of an oxymoron. Management Insights, 22.
Von Krogh, Georg, Ichijo, Kazuo, & Nonaka, Ikujiro. (2000). Enabling knowledge creation: How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation: Oxford university press.
Wathne, Kenneth, Roos, Johan, & von Krogh, Georg. (1996). Towards a theory of knowledge transfer in a cooperative context. London: Sage Publications
White, T. (2004). Knowledge management in an academic library case study: KM within Oxford University Library Services (OULS).
Yu, Martin YC, Wilkins, Linda, & Ma, Will WK. (2004). Developing an instrument for measuring knowledge sharing attitudes. Innovations through information technology, ed. M. Khosrow-Pour, 272-275.
Zand, Dale E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative science quarterly, 229-239.