همکنشی اکوسیستم نوآوری و اکوسیستم طبیعی بر چگونگی شکل گیری مکانهای کارآفرین از دیدگاه بازآفرینی شهری با استفاده از روش فرا ترکیب (2020-2010)
محورهای موضوعی : شهرسازیساناز نقشی زادیان 1 , مجتبی رفیعیان 2 , زهرا سادات سعیده زرآبادی 3 , حمید ماجدی 4
1 - گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 - گروه شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
3 - گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 - گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: اکوسیستم نوآوری, اکوسیستم طبیعی, بازآفرینی شهری, مکانهای شهری, فرا ترکیب,
چکیده مقاله :
معیارها و شاخص های مؤثر بر رفتار مکانهای کارآفرین شهری و سیاستهای تشکیل چنین مکانهایی باید برگرفته از تغییر ساختار برنامه ها و استراتژی های مکانها و فضاهای شهری باشد. اما، این تغییرات صرفا با توجه به رویکردهای پیشین و تجربیات گذشته بدون تعامل با رویکردهای اصلی تأثیر گذار بر ریشه های رفتاری در شکل گیری مکانهای کارآفرین شهری مواجه بوده است. لذا مطالعات واقعگرایانه و سیاستگذاری با توجه به سیستم های نوین جهانی بر روی مکانها و فضاهایی که مستعد توسعه و پیشرفت هستند و همچنین، مکانهایی که قابلیت بهسازی و باززنده سازی را دارا میباشند، بیش از هر زمان دیگری متصور میشود. لذا، این پژوهش در راستای اهدف خود با کمک روش فراترکیب ابزاری برای توسعه چارچوب مفهومی، بر اساس همکنش دو رویکرد "اکوسیستم نو آوری و اکوسیستم طبیعی شهری" ارائه داده که نتایج آن ظهور دانشی نوین در ایجاد مکانهای کارآفرینی در تعامل با بازآفرینی شهری میباشد. یافته های این مقاله، با تمرکز برمفاهیم و معیارهای بدست آمده از دو رویکرد منتهی به استخراج 4 مؤلفه گردید، مؤلفه های استخراج شده سوابق مداخلات، مشخصه ها، روابط متقابل، منابع، دیدگاهها، سیاستها و مفاهیم دو رویکرد را با هم ادغام کرده و راهکار زمینه های تغییر در رفتار شکل گیری و ایجاد مکانهایی پویا و کارآمد را ارائه داده است. نتایج حاصل ارتباطات اجتماعی-فرهنگی، ارتقاء و پیشرفت رفاه جامعه مدنی، تاثیر سیستم های هوشمند بر جامعه مدنی واقتصادی و نهایتاً تاثیر مثبت دانش و آموزش بر رفتارهای انسانی و فرهنگی را ارائه داده است. لذا، این پژوهش را میتوان نمونه ای آزمون شده برای پایه گذاری انجام تحقیقاتی در آینده دانست.
The criteria and indicators affecting the behavior of urban entrepreneurial places and the policies of forming such places should be derived from the change in the structure of plans and strategies of urban places and spaces. However, these changes have been faced only with regard to previous approaches and past experiences without interacting with the main approaches affecting behavioral roots in the formation of urban entrepreneur places. Therefore, realistic studies and policy-making with regard to modern global systems on places and spaces that are prone to development and progress, as well as places that have the ability to be improved and revitalized, are imagined more than ever. Therefore, in line with its goals, this research has provided a tool for developing a conceptual framework based on the interaction of two approaches "innovation ecosystem and natural urban ecosystem" with the help of metacombination method, the results of which is the emergence of new knowledge in creating entrepreneurial places in interaction with urban regeneration. . The findings of this article, by focusing on the concepts and criteria obtained from the two approaches, led to the extraction of 4 components, the extracted components integrate records of interventions, characteristics, mutual relationships, resources, views, policies and concepts of the two approaches and The solution has presented the fields of change in the behavior of formation and creation of dynamic and efficient places. The results of socio-cultural communication, the promotion and development of the welfare of the civil society, the impact of intelligent systems on the civil and economic society, and finally the positive impact of knowledge and education on human and cultural behaviors have been presented. Therefore, this research can be considered as a tested example for the foundation of conducting research in the future.
Aboelnaga, S., Toth, T., & Neszmelyi, G. I. (2019). Land use management along urban development axis as one of urban regeneration principles. 944–953. https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev2019.18.N382#
Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8#
Allam, Z., & Newman, P. (2018). Economically Incentivising Smart Urban Regeneration. Case Study of Port Louis, Mauritius. Smart Cities, 1(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities1010004#
Andonova, V., Nikolova, M. S., & Dimitrov, D. (2019). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Unexpected Places. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Unexpected Places, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98219-9#
ANECHITEI, A.-A. (2018). Social Innovation through Urban Regeneration – A Local Model. Review of International Comparative Management, 19(3), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.24818/rmci.2018.3.244#
Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017). Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7#
Brush, C., Edelman, L. F., Manolova, T., & Welter, F. (2019). A gendered look at entrepreneurship ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 53(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-9992-9#
Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., & Donovan, J. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Social Science and Medicine, 56(4), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00064-3
Carè, S., Trotta, A., Carè, R., & Rizzello, A. (2018). Crowdfunding for the development of smart cities. Business Horizons, 61(4), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.12.001#
Carter, C. A., Roberts, P., Roberts, P., Sykes, H., & Granger, R. (2018). Urban Regeneration Strategy and Partnership in Urban Regeneration. In H. sykes & R. G. Peter roberts (Ed.), sage Publications Ltd (pp. 44–67)#
Chrastina, J. (2018). Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies: Background,Methodology and Applications. NORDSCI Conference Proceedings Book 1 Volume 1, 1, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.32008/nordsci2018/b1/v1/13#
Colantonio, A., & Dixon, T. (2011). Urban Regeneration: Delivering Social Sustainability. Urban Regeneration & Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities, 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444329445.ch4#
Colombelli, A., Paolucci, E., & Ughetto, E. (2019). Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9957-4#
Couch, C., & Dennemann, A. (2000). Urban regeneration and sustainable development in Britain The example of the Liverpool Ropewalks Partnership. 17(2), 137–147#
De Medici, S., Riganti, P., & Viola, S. (2018). Circular economy and the role of universities in urban regeneration: The case of Ortigia, Syracuse. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114305#
Dobson, S., & Jorgensen, A. (2015). Increasing the resilience and adaptive capacity of cities through entrepreneurial urbanism. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 6(3–4), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGSB.2014.067508#
Dogruyol, K., Aziz, Z., & Arayici, Y. (2018). Eye of sustainable planning: A conceptual heritage-led urban regeneration planning framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051343#
Egusquiza, A., Cortese, M., & Perfido, D. (2019). Mapping of innovative governance models to overcome barriers for nature based urban regeneration. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 323(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/323/1/012081#
Fayolle, A., & Matlay, H. (2010). Handbook of research on social entrepreneurship. Handbook of Research on Social Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849804684#
Fortunato, M. W. P., & Alter, T. (2015). Community entrepreneurship development: an introduction. Community Development, 46(5), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1080742#
Gianoli, A., & Palazzolo Henkes, R. (2020). The Evolution and Adaptive Governance of the 22@ Innovation District in Barcelona. Urban Science, 4(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4020016#
Goldberg, M., Pasher, E., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Citizen participation in decision-making processes: Knowledge sharing in knowledge cities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(5), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610691206#
Hakala, H., O’Shea, G., Farny, S., & Luoto, S. (2020). Re-storying the Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Concepts: The Model-Narrative Review Method. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(1), 10–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12212#
Iacobucci, D., & Perugini, F. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and economic resilience at local level. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 00(00), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2021.1888318#
Isenberg, D. J. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurships. The Babsos Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project, 1(781), 1–13. http://www.wheda.com/uploadedFiles/Website/About_Wheda/Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project.pdf#
Kaltenborn, B. P., Linnell, J. D. C., Baggethun, E. G., Lindhjem, H., Thomassen, J., & Chan, K. M. (2017). Ecosystem Services and Cultural Values as Building Blocks for ‘The Good life’. A Case Study in the Community of Røst, Lofoten Islands, Norway. Ecological Economics, 140, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.003#
Kellogg, S. (2018). Urban Ecosystem Justice: The Field Guide to a Socio-Ecological Systems Science of Cities for the People. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 361. http://proxy.library.nyu.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/urban-ecosystem-justice-field-guide-socio/docview/2085321632/se-2?accountid=12768%0Ahttp://getit.library.nyu.edu/resolve?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:
knuuttila Johannes Jussi. (2018). Exploring the potential of cultural ecosystem services in social impact assessment of Finnish mining projects. stockholm university#
Lauermann, J. (2018). Municipal statecraft: Revisiting the geographies of the entrepreneurial city. Progress in Human Geography, 42(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516673240#
Lewrick, M., Omar, M., Raeside, R., & Sailer, K. (2011). Education for entrepreneurship and innovation: “Management capabilities for sustainable growth and success.” World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 6(1/2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/20425961201000001
Lindgreen, A.,palmer, R., and Vanhamme, j. (2014). Contemporary Marketing Practiece:Theoretical Proposition and Practical Implication. Marketing Intelligence &planning, 22(6), 673–692#.
Mack, E., & Mayer, H. (2016). The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547#
#Magalha, C. De. (2015). Urban Regeneration. 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.74031-1
Markatou, M., & Alexandrou, E. (2015). Urban System of Innovation: Main Agents and Main Factors of Success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.355#
McKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. (2015). Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.002#
Morisson, A. (2020). A framework for defining innovation districts: Case study from 22@ barcelona. Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17308-1_17#
Morisson, A., & Bevilacqua, C. (2019). Balancing gentrification in the knowledge economy: the case of Chattanooga’s innovation district. Urban Research and Practice, 12(4), 472–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1472799#
Muñoz-Erickson, T. A., Miller, C. A., & Miller, T. R. (2017). How cities think: Knowledge co-production for urban sustainability and resilience. Forests, 8(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/f8060203#
Muñoz, P., & Cohen, B. (2016). The making of the urban entrepreneur. California Management Review, 59(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125616683953#
O’Connor, A., Stam, E., Sussan, F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2018). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: The Foundations of Place-based Renewal. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63531-6_1#
#OECD. (2004). entrepreneurship:A catalyst for urban regeneration. In Local Economic and Employment Developmentevelopment.
#owoade, abbas. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystem development: learning from successes abbas owoade. univrtsity of stockholm.
Piacentino, D., Bono, F., Cracolici, M. F., & Giuliani, D. (2017). A spatial analysis of new business formation: Replicative vs innovative behaviour. Spatial Statistics, 21, 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2017.02.004#
Pires, A. P. F., Amaral, A. G., Padgurschi, M. C. G., Joly, C. A., & Scarano, F. R. (2018). Biodiversity research still falls short of creating links with ecosystem services and human well-being in a global hotspot. Ecosystem Services, 34(March), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.10.001#
Plieninger.t Dijks.s;oteros-Rozas.e;Bieling.c. (2013). assessing,mapping and quantifing cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33(2013), 118–129#.
Putra, Z. D. W., & van der Knaap, W. G. M. (2018). Urban innovation system and the role of an open web-based platform: The case of Amsterdam smart city. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 29(3), 234–249. https://doi.org/10.5614/jrcp.2018.29.3.4#
Rafian, M., Mohammadi Ayadghamish, F. (2016). Presenting a conceptual model of urban regeneration and entrepreneurship city in accessing to place marketing. Scientific Quarterly of Economics and Urban Management, 2(5), 1–20#.
#roberts, p ; sykes, h. (2000). urban reganaration:A HANDBOOK (1st ed.). The British Urban Regeneration Association.
#Roberts, P., Sykes, H., & Granger, R. (2017). Urban regeneration. In Urban Book Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43735-4_4
Roja, A. (2015). Technology Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Entrepreneurship in the West Region of Romania. Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, 25(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1515/sues-2015-0004#
Roundy, P. T. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems Complementary or disjoint phenomena? International Journal of Social Economics, 44(9), 1252–1267. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2016-0045#
Sader, N. Al, Kleinhans, R., & Ham, M. Van. (2019). Entrepreneurial citizenship in urban regeneration in the Netherlands. Citizenship Studies, 23(5), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2019.1621266#
Sahin, M., Nijkamp, P., & Stough, R. (2011). Impact of urban conditions on firm performance of migrant entrepreneurs: A comparative Dutch-US study. Annals of Regional Science, 46(3), 661–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0351-2#
#sandelowski, M., Barroso, J, . (2007). Handbook for SYNTHESIZING QUALITATIVE RESERACH.
Sarma, S., & Sunny, S. A. (2017). Civic entrepreneurial ecosystems: Smart city emergence in Kansas City. Business Horizons, 60(6), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.010#
Shwetzer, C., Maritz, A., & Nguyen, Q. (2019). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a holistic and dynamic approach. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, 1(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiuc-03-2019-0007#
Spena, T. R., Trequa, M., & Bifulco, F. (2016). Knowledge Practices for an Emerging Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 13(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877016400137#
Spigel, B. (2017). The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167#
#Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5
Taylor, L., & Hochuli, D. F. (2015). Creating better cities: how biodiversity and ecosystem functioning enhance urban residents’ wellbeing. Urban Ecosystems, 18(3), 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0427-3#
VasconcelosGomes, L., Figueiredo Facin, A. L., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. (2016). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009#
Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03380.x#
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2021). Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 00(0), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948#
Golkar, K. (1390). Creating a sustainable place for reflections on urban design theory. Printing and Publishing Center of Shahid Beheshti University.
Khosravi Mashizi, A. (2016). Ecosystem services are a new criterion for evaluating ecosystem power and land use. Proceedings of the second national conference on new approaches to land management in Iran, 1163-1174#.
Knox, P. L. (2012). Cities and design, translation and authorship, A. Nazarian, S. Mirfateh Elahi, K. Zalnejad, Sh. Irani, and A. Nowruzzadeh; first edition). Zabanesara Poya Publications).#
Landry Charles. (2014). Creative City: translation by Mahmoud Abdullahzadeh, (1st edition), cultural research office. 1st edition). Zabanesara Poya Publications.)#
Pamir, S. (2012). Creating a living urban center Principles of urban design and regeneration (third edition). Tehran University of Science and Technology.
Pejohan, M., & Pourmoghadam, Z. (2017). Strategic planning of urban tourism with the approach of recreating the base culture in the historical context of a case study: the old context of Rasht city. Scientific Research Quarterly of Urban Studies, 27, 53-66#.
Qavamipour, M., & Khodami, M. (2018). Translation of the Global Entrepreneurship Report. Ministry of Labor Cooperative and Social Welfare Https://Karafarini.Mcls.Gov.Ir/Fa/Article/1158/%D8#.
#Roberts, P. (2013). Urban regeneration, a guide book, translation, p. Hanachi, and S. Yazidi, first edition). Tehran University Publishing Institute).
#Scott, A. J. (1383). Global cities-regions, translator: P. A. Lutfi First Edition. Urban planning and processing company