مقایسه عوامل مؤثر در ورود زنان ومردان به دانشگاه

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعه

مصطفی ظهیری نیا ¹ (استادیار گروه علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه هرمزگان)
بهروز بهروزیان ² (دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد پژوهشگری اجتماعی دانشگاه هرمزگان)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/09/24 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/09/24 تاریخ انتشار : 1391/10/01

کلید واژه: دانشجویان, ورود دختران به دانشگاه, انگیزه, بومی گزینی, دانشگاه آیت ا... بروجردی,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف از این پژوهش بررسی عوامل و انگیزه‌های موثر در ورود دختران به دانشگاه (پس از اجرای سیاست بومی گزینی در دانشگاهها) نسبت به پسران، در بین دانشجویان دانشگاه آیت ا... العظمی بروجردی می باشد. این پژوهش با روش پیمایشی به انجام رسیده است. حجم نمونه این پژوهش با بهره گیری از فرمول کوکران شامل 250 نفر (100مرد و 150 زن) برآورد گردیده که به روش نمونه گیری طبقه‌ندی انتخاب شده‌اند. داده های این پژوهش با استفاده از آزمون‌های مناسب و با بهره گیری از نرم افزار spss مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج بدست آمده نشان می‌دهند که انگیزه‌های اقتصادی- سیاسی (عاملی مهم برای پسران)، و پایگاه اقتصادی و اجتماعی، ازدواج و جاذبه محیط دانشگاه در بین دختران به نسبت پسران عوامل مهم‌تری برای ادامه ی تحصیل (ورود به دانشگاه) می باشد.
 

چکیده انگلیسی:

The current research aims at study on the effective factors and motivation about entrance of girls to university in comparison to boys among Ayatollah Ozma Boroojerdi university students, after implementing localization policy in universities. This study has been conducted by using survey method. The participants through using kookran formula include 250 students, 100 men and 150 women, which has been chosen through classified sampling. The data has been analyzed by using the appropriate tests and spss software. Base on the obtained results, economic-political motivation- an important factor for boys- economic and social base, marriage and campus among girls are more important in comparison to boys for continuing graduation (entranceto university).
 

منابع و مأخذ:

1- Adams, john E. (1997). A Study To Determine The Impact of a Percal- Lege

Internvention on Early Adolescent Asparition& Motivation for College West

Virjnia. Black Sburg, virjinia.

2- Alavi Tabar, A.R. (2000).reserch the Patterns of citizen participation in urban

governance, Tehran: Municipalities of the country (persion).

3- Anderson, P. (1998): Choice, Can we Choose It?, in j. Radford(ed), Gender

and Choice In Education And Occupation; Routledge, Landan.

4- Canton, E. & Venniker, R. (2001); Higher Education Reform : Getting The

Incentives Right; CHEPS, Netherland.

5- Fatehi, A. Gh., And Others" (2009): "Why Increase theRelative pictures of

Girls", Sociology and Social Sciences, summer, No. 44, 173-204 (persion).

6- Gholami, U. (2004). Review of Motivation in Entering College girls. Journal

of Education, winter, No. 23 (persion).

7- Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education. (2011), Statistics of

Education Report, various years (persion).

8- Japanese Government Polices in Education, Science, Sport and Culture

(1999); www.Mext.go.jp/eky

9- Khodai, A. (2009): "Factors in the Acceptance Test Masters", Journal of

Research and Planning in Higher Education, fifteen year, No. 54, 19-34

(persion).

10- Little, D. (1995). Explanation in the social sciences, translated abdolkarim

Soroush, Tehran: Serat (persion).

11- Maleki Doabi, F. (2010). Cultural and socioeconomic factors influencing

entrance to college girls. Bachelor thesis, University of martyr Chamran

(persion).

12- Maxwell, G. & Collegue. (2000). How People Choose Vocational

Educatianal And Training Program;NCVER publ, Australia.

13- Naqvi, F. (2002). Increase of Female Students in the university and its

social and cultural implications, reliability MS Thesis, University of Isfahan

(persion). 

 14- Noland & deato, N. (2001). Tennessee higher education.commis-sion

higher school.student opinin.

15- Office Planning and Social and Cultural Studies (2002). Analysis of

Increasing the Proportion of Women in Higher Education, Tehran: Office

Planning and Social and Cultural Studies, Ministry of Science, Research and

Tecnology (persion).

16- Ritzer, G. (2008). Contemporary Sociology Theory. (Mohsen salasi).

Tehran: Scientific Publications (persion).

17- Roozbehani Mohammadi, Kianoosh, taremi, Abolfazl. (2005). Candidates

for admission to the University of motivational factors. Journal of Research

Planning in Higher Education, No. 37 and 38 (persion).

18- Safiri, Kh. (2006). Women and Education. Journal of The College of

Literature, Science And The Humanities, No. 56, 57 (persion).

19- Shareh Pour, M. (2010). Sociology of Education. Tehran: samt. (persion).

20- Smith, A. (1996). Symposium Equal Opportunities Women of euro-pan,

University. University of Berlin November.

21- Tavassoli, Gh. A. (2008). Theories of Sociology. Tehran:samt, The,

Fifteenth edition (persion).

22- The World Conference On Higher Education In The Twenty-first century:

Vision and Action, Was Held in Unescu Headquarters in Paris, From 5-9

October 1998.

23- The National Youth Agency (2001). Position and Attitude of the Youth of

Iran,Tehran (persion).

24- Vdadhyr, A.A. (2001), AnAnalysis ofThePhenomenon of Convergence of

Degree in Social, Letter Iranian Sociological Association: Social Issues Special

Conference of Iran, third year, 179-192 (persion).