بررسی دیدگاه‌های دانش‌آموزان دختر دوره متوسطه در مورد معیارهای اجتماعی- آموزشی انتخاب مدرسه غیردولتی
محورهای موضوعی : زن و جامعهخدیجه بزرگی نژاد 1 , رضا زارعی 2
1 - دانشجوی دوره دکتری گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.
2 - استادیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد مرودشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مرودشت، ایران.
کلید واژه: مدرسه غیردولتی, معیارهای اجتماعی, مدیریت مدرسه, ویژگی‌های معلمان, دانش آموز دختر,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر باهدف بررسی دیدگاه‌های دانش‌آموزان دختر دورهی متوسطه در مورد معیارهای اجتماعی-آموزشی انتخاب مدرسهی غیردولتی انجام شد. روش انجام تحقیق کمّی و از نوع توصیفی - پیمایشی بود. جامعه آماری، دانش‌آموزان دختر پایهی یازدهم مدارس غیردولتی شهرستان فیروزآباد بود. حجم نمونه با جامعه مساوی و تعداد 119 دانش‌آموز بود. ابزار مورداستفاده، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته در دو بعد اجتماعی -آموزشی شامل چهار مؤلفهی اجتماعی (امور پرورشی، امور انگیزشی، ویژگی‌های معلمان و نتایج مدرسه) و پنج مؤلفهی آموزشی (امکانات فیزیکی و آموزشی، کیفیت آموزشی، فناوری اطلاعات، ارزشیابی مستمر و مدیریت مدرسه) با 45 شاخص بود. نتایج نشان داد که دانش‌آموزان، مؤلفهی مدیریت مدرسه را مهم‌ترین معیار انتخاب مدرسه غیردولتی می‌دانند. همچنین ویژگی‌های معلمان و امور انگیزشی در اولویت‌های بعدی قرار گرفت. ضمن این‌که از 45 شاخص پرسشنامه، شاخص‌های آشنایی مدیر مدرسه با شیوه‌های علمی مدیریت، برخورداری از معلمان متخصص و ارتباطات دائمی معلمان با اولیاء، از دیدگاه دانش‌آموزان حائز بیشترین اهمیت بودند. در مجموع معیارهای اجتماعی با میانگین 04/5 و معیارهای آموزشی با میانگین 00/5 در انتخاب مدرسه دخالت داشتند.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the views of high school girl students about socio-educational criteria to choose a nongovernmental school. The research method was quantitative and descriptive-survey method. The statistical population consisted of eleventh – grade girl students of nongovernmental schools in Firoozabad. Sample size with the same population was 119 students. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire including 4 social components (educational issues, motivational affairs, teachers' characteristics and school outcomes) and 5 educational components (physical and educational facilities, educational quality, information technology, school management and constant evaluation) with 45 indicators. Data analysis was done by single sample t- test and Friedman ranking test. The results showed that students considered the school management component as the most important criterion for choosing a nongovernmental school. Also, the characteristics of teachers and motivational issues were placed in the next priorities. In addition, the familiarity of the school principal with the scientific methods of management, the availability of specialized teachers and the permanent communication between parents and teachers were important for students. In general, social standards with an average of 5.04 and educational criteria with an average of 5.00 were involved in the selecting of the school.
-Alagheband, A. (2011). Training management arrangements. Tehran, Ravan Publications.
-Azizi, N; Jafari, P; Farzad, V & Senobari, M. (2013). Obstacles to the expansion of private sector participation in education and training in Iran: Case study of nonprofit schools. Journal of Educational Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, 6(1), PP: 75-94.
-Bagherzadeh, A and Khazei, F. (2010). Nongovernmental schools are a symbol of popular contributions. Program Journal, No 370, pp: 4-7.
-Checkland, P. (1999). System thinking, systems practice, Chichester: John Welley & Sons, LTD.
-Darrow, Alice-Ann (2016). The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): What It Means For Students With Disabilities And Music Educator. General Music Today, VOL 30(1), P.P 41-44.
-Dehghanpoor, A; Parsa, A & Mehralizadeh, Y. (2015). Investigating the relationship between school size, school culture and academic achievement among high school students in secondary schools in Ahvaz. Educational Science, No 100, pp: 67-98.
-Eskandari, H. (2012). Investigating the relationship between school activities and students' identity dimensions. Quarterly Journal of Educational Psychology, No 25, pp: 113-136.
-Hajebi, M. (2017). Study of the relationship between the experiences of high school teachers and continuing education. New research in humanities, No 36, pp: 1-18.
-Haji Babayi, H. (2012). The school features I like in light of the document on the fundamental transformation in education. Educational innovation, No 42, pp: 51-74.
-Hasani, R; Jamali, A; Taghipoor, Z & Rahgozar, M. (2017). The factor analysis and model of the measurement of the ranking of secondary schools in the country. Quarterly Journal of Educational Management Research, 8(4), PP: 41-63.
-Henry, T. (2001), Creating a place where people want to be. Middle Ground, 3, 10-16.
-Homafar, MH & the Authors' Group. (2005). Provincial Education Document for all (EFA). Shiraz Printing House. P: 52.
-Imani, M.T and Mohammadi, F. (2012). Identifying the features of high schools and the flexibility of high schools in Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Educational Management Research, No 12, pp: 71-106.
-Khademi fard, N; Abbaspoor, A & Hosseinzadeh, M. (2015). Identifying the characteristics and dimensions of Islamic schools in Iran along with providing the ideal model of Islamic school. New Educational Thoughts, No 43, pp: 69-94.
-Machayekh, F. (2002). New perspectives in Educational Planning. Tehran, samt, Mehr pablications
-Madandar arani, A; Kakia, L & Moazeni, B. (2013). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Stopping of Nongovernmental Schools and Providing Solutions for it. Educational Sciences: Education, No 115, pp: 109-126.
-Mahdikhani, H. (2015). A model for evaluating the performance and ranking of secondary schools by using multi-indicator decision making ANP-DEMATEL in a fuzzy environment (case study: Training and education in Mianeh city). First National Conference on Industrial Engineering, 992-1016.
-Moazami Goodarzi, F. (2013). Identification of Tehran University Secondary School Ranking Quality Indices. Islamic Azad University of Roudhen Branch, Master's Thesis.
-Mohammad zadeh kamali, H & Sabagh, S. (2017). Investigating the existing problems of non-traditional teachers in Ticmo Wash area and the impact on educational quality. Sociological studies, No 36, pp: 99-116.
-Nasoohi Dehnavi, M; Ahmadi, SA & Abedi, MR. (2004). The Relationship Between Happiness and School Factors in High School Students. Knowledge and research in applied psychology, No 19-20, pp: 33-50.
-Niaz Azari, K & Taghvaee Yazdi, M. (2016). Organizational Culture in the Third Millenium. 2nd edition, Shiveh publication.
-Niknami, M & Mahdiyan, MJ. (2009). Explaining the Dimensions and Components of Effective Schools and Providing a Model for Improving Effectiveness in Schools of the Country. Leadership and educational management, No 7, pp: 171-199.
-Nikpoor, M; Bolhasani, G & Najafi, SE. (2015). Ranking of Elementary Schools in Firoozkooh City Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). International Conference on Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering.
-Pahang, N; Mahdiun, R and Yarigholi, B. (2017). Assessing the quality of schools and identifying its factors, mixed research. School Management Quarterly, 5(1), pp: 173-193.
-Saraf, A. (2005). Service standardization process. Journal of Administrative Transformation, 8(45).
-Salomon, G. (1996). Studying Novel learning environments as patterns of change. In S. Vosniadou, E. International perspectives on the design of technology supported learning environments, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
-Shahabi, SM & Yazdani, R. (2017). The use of modern educational equipment and technology based on the Islamic Criterion System (centered on the document on the fundamental evolution of education). New research in humanities, No 19, pp: 77-85.
-Tavoli, Z. (2014). Compilation of standard markers for assessment and ranking of high schools in Damavand. Islamic Azad University of Roudhen Branch, Master's Thesis.
-Young, Michelle. DR Winn, Kathleen. MR Reedy, Marcy. A (2017). The Every Student Succeeds Act: Strengthening The Focus On Educational Leadership. Educational Administration, VOL 53(5) – P.P 705-726.
-Zaki, M.A. (2010). School Organizational Effectiveness Factors and its Relationship with Educational Characteristics of Teachers. Human Sciences Journal of Imam Hossein University, 18(8), PP: 160-194.
-Zeinabadi, HR. Abdolhoseini, B. (2017). A successful school, successful director of a successful study of the findings of the International School of Management (ISSPP) International Project. Educational innovation, No 61, pp: 21-42.
_||_