مدل معادلات ساختاری تعهد زناشویی و سبک‌های عشق ورزی با صمیمیت زناشویی با توجه به نقش میانجی رضایت جنسی
محورهای موضوعی : زن و خانوادهزهرا تقی یار 1 , فرشاد پهلوان زاده 2 , ژاله رفاهی 3
1 - کارشناس ارشد مشاوره خانواده دانشگاه هرمزگان، هرمزگان، ایران.
2 - کارشناس ارشد مشاوره خانواده دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی مرودشت، شیراز، ایران
3 - دانشیار گروه مشاوره .واحد مرودشت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی . مرودشت ایران
کلید واژه: سبک عشق ورزی, صمیمیت زناشویی, رضایت جنسی, واژه‌های کلیدی: تعهد زناشویی,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش با هدف مدل معادلات ساختاری صمیمیت زناشویی انجام گرفت. در این مطالعه ی همبستگی از بین تمام زوجین شهر اصفهان در سال 1393 تعداد 272 نفر به روش تصادفی در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه‌های تعهد زناشویی آدامز و جونز، سبک‌های عشق ورزی لی، صمیمیت زناشویی باگاروزی و پرسشنامه ی رضایت جنسی پینی بود. داده‌های پژوهش با روش معادلات ساختاری در نرم افزار AMOS تحلیل گردید. نتایج تحلیل نشان داد که اثر کل و مستقیم تعهد زناشویی بر صمیمیت زناشویی غیرمعنی دار است. اما تأثیر سبک‌های عشق ورزی بر صمیمیت زناشویی معنی دار به دست آمده است. در بررسی اثرات مستقیم نیز دیده می شود که اثر مستقیم تعهد زناشویی و سبک‌های عشق ورزی بر رضایت جنسی معنی دار است اما تأثیر رضایت جنسی بر صمیمیت زناشویی غیرمعنی دار به دست آمده است. نتایج نشان می دهد که تأثیر غیر مستقیم تعهد زناشویی بر صمیمیت زناشویی و هم چنین سبک‌های عشق ورزی بر صمیمیت زناشویی معنی دار است. از آن جا که تأثیرات مستقیم تعهد زناشویی بر صمیمیت زناشویی معنی دار به دست نیامد، می توان گفت تأثیر رضایت جنسی بر رابطه تعهد زناشویی با صمیمیت زناشویی، میانجی کامل است. اما از آن جا که تأثیر مستقیم سبک‌های عشق ورزی بر صمیمیت زناشویی معنی دار شد، نشان می دهد که رضایت جنسی در این رابطه نقش میانجی گری جزیی را دارد.
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between marital commitment, lovemaking styles with marital intimacy in married couples regarding the role of sexual satisfaction as mediator. In this correlational study, 272 individuals were selected among all married couples in 1393 in Isfahan applying the convenience random sampling method. Data were collected using the marital commitment questionnaires of Adams and Jones, Lee’s lovemaking styles, Bagarozy’s marital intimacy and Pini’s sexual satisfaction questionnaire. Data were analyzed using structural equation method in AMOS software. The results of the analysis showed that the direct and total effect of marital commitment on marital intimacy is not significant. But lovemaking styles significantly influence the marital Intimacy (p < 0.05). In examining the direct effects it is also seen that the direct effect of marital commitment and lovemaking styles on sexual satisfaction is significant (p < 0.05). But the effect of sexual satisfaction on marital intimacy is not significant. The results show that the indirect effect of marital commitment on marital intimacy is significant as well as the indirect effect of lovemaking styles on marital intimacy (p < 0.05). It can be suggested that the effect of sexual satisfaction on the relationship between marital commitment and marital intimacy is a full mediator since the direct effects of marital commitment on marital intimacy did not appear to be significant. But since the direct effect of lovemaking styles on marital intimacy was significant, it reveals that sexual satisfaction plays the role of a partial mediator in this relationship.
References
- Acker, M., & Davis, M. H. (1992). Intimacy, passion and commitment in adult romantic relationships: A test of the triangular theory of love. Journal of social and personal Relationships, 9(1),2-50.
- Bagarozzi, D.(2001). Enhancing intimacy in marriage: AClinician’s Handbook.London, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
- Bakhshayesh, A., & Mortazavi, M. (2009). Relationship between sexual satisfaction, general health and marital satisfaction in couples. Journal of Applied Psychology, Issue 4, 85-73. (In Persian)
- Barnes, G. G. (2006). Family therapy in Changing Times: BasicTexts in Counselling and Psychotherapy. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Batt, V., & et al. (2005). Perspective on Provision of counselling forwoman inirland, 1-13.
- Berger, R., & Hannah, M. (1999). Preventive Approaches incouples therapy.Phildelphia: Brunner/ Mazel.
- Blume, T.W. (2006 .(Becoming a family counselor: a bridge tofamily therapy theory and practice. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.Published simultaneously in Canada.
- Buscalia, L (1993). Zadeh For Love, Translator Hoshyar Ansari Fard, Second Edition, Tehran: Alborz Publications. (In Persian)
- Cho. W., & Cross, S.E. (1995). Taiwanese love styles and their association with self-esteem and relationship quality. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs,121, 283-310.
- Esa nejad, A., Ahmadi, A., & Etemadi, A. (2010). Structural Relationships Between Style of Love and Marriage Quality. Consultative Research, 11( 41), 43-27. (In Persian)
- Esa nejad, O., Shamaei, F., & Ahmadi Q (2008). Marital love making and marriage styles. Proceedings of the Third National Congress of Family Pathology, 291. (In Persian)
- Etemadi, A. (2005). A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Behavioral Psychological Orientation and Therapeutic Relationship on Couples Intimacy. PhD dissertation, Tarbiat Moalem University of Tehran. (In Persian)
- Harris, V, W. (2006). Marital quality, context, and interaction: A comparison of individuals actress various income levels. Sci Context, 17, 48-52.
- Heller, P. E., & Wood, B. (1998). The process of intimacy: Similarity, understanding and gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24(3), 273-288.
- Hendrick, C., & Hendrick. S. S. (19). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 392-402.
- Janetius, T. (2004). Marriage and marital adjustment. Available online at: www.homestead.com/Psycho – religion / files / adjustment.
- Kapinus, C. A., & Johnson, M. P. (2003). The utility of family life cycle as a theoretical and empirical tools. Commitment and family life- cycle stage. Journal of family issues, 24(2), 155-184.
- Kirby, J.S., Baucom, D.H., & Peterman, M.A. (2005). An investigation of unmet intimacy needs in marital relationships. J Marital and Family Therapy, 31(4), 313-25
- Laurenceau, J., Barrett L., & Rovine M., J. (2005). “The Interpersonal Process Model of Intimacy in Marriage: A Daily- Diary and Multilevel Modeling Approach. Journal of FamilyPsychology, 19(2), 314–323.
- Levin, J., & et al (2006). A prolegomena to an epidemiology of love theory, measurenment and health outcomes, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 117- 136.
- Masters, A. (2008). Marriage, commitment and divorce in a matching model with differential aging. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11, 614–628.
- Nichols, M. P. (2005). Concurrent discriminant validity of the Kansas marital satisfaction scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48(2), 381-387.
- Nielson, J. (2005). The Relationship between Attachment, Love Styles, and Marital Quality. Doctoral Thesis. Utah State University.
- Nooranipour, R., Besharat, M. A., & Yousefi, S (2007). The Relationship between Knowledge and Sexual Attitude and Marital Satisfaction in Couples Living in the Young Scientists' Complex of Shahid Beheshti University. Journal of Research in Counseling, 6 (24), 27-39. (In Persian)
- Rahmani, A., Merqhati Khoei, E., Sadeghi, N., & Allah Gholy, L. (2011). Sexual communication and marital satisfaction. Journal of Nursing, 24(70), 90-82. (In Persian)
- Shah siyah, M. (2008). Effect of Sexual Education on Improving Marital Quality of Couples in Isfahan, Master's Degree in Family Counseling, Isfahan University. Faculty of Education and Psychology. (In Persian)
- Shamloo, S. (2001). Mental Health, Tehran: Growth Publication(In Persian)
- Slosarz. W. J. (2000). Relationship between lifestyle and factors affecting sexual life . Journal of Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 15(2), 367-380.
- Sprecher, S., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (2008). Handbook ofrelationship initiation. New York. Psychology Press.
- Sternberg‚ R. J. (1986). The tringle of love: Intimacy‚ Passion‚ Commitment. New York: Basic Book.
- Vaezi, M., Khanbani, M., Tavakoli, M., & Khami, M. (2008). The Effect of Lovemaking on Marital Satisfaction. Journal of Family and Research, 2( 4). (In Persian)
Vandermassen, G. (2004). Sexual selection: A tale of male and feminist denial. European Journal of Women's St
_||_