بررسی مقایسه‌ای شرکت‌های هواپیمایی جمهوری اسلامی ایران از منظر مسئولیت اجتماعی با رویکرد کارول
محورهای موضوعی : جامعه شناسی
هوشنگ تقی‌زاده
1
(
دانشیار گروه مدیریت، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی؛ تبریز- ایران (نویسنده مسئول).
)
غلامرضا سلطانی فسقندیس
2
(
گروه مدیریت، پردیس بین‌الملل، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد- ایران.
)
عبدالحسین شکری
3
(
گروه مدیریت، واحد بستان‌آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی؛ بستان‌آباد- ایران.
)
کلید واژه: بعد اخلاقی, بعد اقتصادی, مسئولیت اجتماعی بنگاه, بعد قانونی و نوع دوستی,
چکیده مقاله :
سازمان‌ها از مجرای تعیین و تبیین خوب و بد در برابر گروه‌های مخالف ذی نفع از خود واکنش نشان می دهند. آن ها به گونه ای عمل می‌کنند که از دیدگاه مشتریان، نهادها و سازمان‌های دولتی، سهامداران و کل جامعه دارای کرداری نیکو باشند؛ رعایت این عوامل تحت عنوان مسئولیت اجتماعی تلقی می شود. تحقیق حاضر با هدف مقایسه شرکت های مسافر بری هواپیمایی جمهوری اسلامی ایران از منظر مسئولیت اجتماعی انجام شده است. روش تحقیق توصیفی بوده و جامعه آماری این تحقیق شامل شرکت های هواپیمایی جمهوری اسلامی ایران می باشد که تعداد آن ها 8 شرکت می باشد. با توجه به محدود بودن جامعه آماری و هدف تحقیق، کل جامعه آماری مورد پیمایش قرار گرفته و نمونه گیری انجام نشده است. برای جمع آوری داده ها از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته استفاده شده است. روایی پرسشنامه به صورت روایی محتوایی و پایایی آن با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه شده است. در طراحی پرسشنامه از ابعاد مسئولیت اجتماعی بنگاه مبتنی بر رویکرد کارول (1991) استفاده شده است. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از روش ویکور[1] و آنتروپی شانون بهره گیری به عمل آمده است. نتایج حاصل بیانگر رتبه هر یک از شرکت ها، از لحاظ میزان توجه به مسئولیت اجتماعی بنگاه می باشد.
Organizationsreact against their opposing beneficiary groups through determining and defining good and bad.They act in such a way that they are considered tobe beneficent from the viewpoint ofcustomers, governmental institutions and organizations, share-holders, and the whole society. Observing these factors is referred to as social responsibility. The aim of this study is to compare Iranian airlines from the perspective of corporate social responsibility. The method of this research is descriptive and the statistical population consists of all the Iranian airlines (eight companies). Regarding the small size of the statistical population and the aim of research, the whole statistical population has been investigated. In order to collect the necessary data, a researcher-made questionnaire has been used. The validity of the questionnaire has been confirmed by content validity and its reliability has been calculated by using Cronbach alpha. In designing the questionnaire, the dimensions of social responsibility based on Carroll’s approach have been used. For the analysis of the data, the methods of Vikor and Shannon entropy have been utilized. The results indicate the rank of each one of these airlines, regarding the amount of attention to social responsibility.
اختیاری، م. (1391). معرفی یک روش ویکور توسعه یافته برای رتبه‌بندی اعتباری مشتریان بانک‌ها. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی.سال نهم، شماره 52.
Broom hill, R. (2007).Corporate Social Responsibility. Key Issues and Debates, Duns tan, no.1.
Carroll, A.B. (1999). Corporate SocialResponsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct, in Business Society, 38; 268, Sage Publications. P.p: 265-295.
COM. (2001). Greenpaper:PromotingaEuropeanframeworkforCorporateSocial Responsibility. COM, (2001). 366 final, 18.7.2001, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.
Daft, R. (2001). OrganizationTheory and Design.Cincinnati, Ohio: South Western, P.p:12-14.
Epstein, M. J. &. Roy, J. (2001). Sustainability in action: Identifying and measuring the key performance drivers, Long Range Planning. V. 34, No. 5, P.p: 585–604.
Figge, F. & Schaltegger, S. (2000). what is “stakeholder value”? Developing a catchphrase intoabenchmarkingtool,Lüneburg/Genf/Paris: University of Luneburg/Pictet/In association with United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).
Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, New York Times Company, September 13th.
Gray, E. R. & Ballmer, J.M.T. (1998). Managing corporate image and corporate reputation, Long Range Planning. V. 31, No. 5, P.p: 695–702.
Heal, G. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, Issues and Practice, V. 30, No. 3.
Heinz, K. L. (2005). In the Mood to Give: How and Why Positive Affect Increases the Importance of CSR to Prospective Employees. Northwestern University.
Kang, K. h. Lee, S. & Huth, C. (2009). Impact of positive and negative corporate social responsibility activities on company performance in the hospitality industry, International Journal of Hospitality Management. www. Sciencedirect.com.
Kong, N. Salzmann, O.& Steger, U. (2002). Moving business/industry towards sustainable consumption: The role of NGOs. European Management Journal. V. 20, No. 2, P.p: 109–127.
Lichtenstein, D. R. Drum wright, M. A. & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate- supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing. No. 68, P.p: 16- 32.
Lynes, J. K. & Andrachuk M. (2008). Motivations for corporate social and environmental responsibility: A case study of Scandinavian Airlines. Journal of International Management. V. 14, Issue 4, P.p: 377-390.
McWilliams, A. & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility:atheory of the firm perspective,The Academy of Management Review. V. 26, No. 1, P.p: 117-127.
Mele, D. & Guillen, M. (2006). The Intellectual Evolution of Strategic Management and ItsRelationship with Ethics and Social Responsibility, Working Paper. No. 658, University of Navarre, IESEBusinessSchool, October. p.3.
Pain, L. S. (1994). ManagingforOrganizationalIntegrity. Harvard Business Review, March. P.p: 106-117.
Porter, M. E. & vanderLinde, C. (1998). Green and competitive. In: M.E. Porter, Editor, On competition, HarvardBusinessSchool, Boston, P.p: 351–375.
Rondinelli, D. A. & London, T. (2002). Stakeholder and corporate responsibilities in cross-sectoralenvironmentalcollaborations: Building value, legitimacy and trust. In: J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted and S. Sutherland Rahman, Editors, Unfolding stakeholder thinking: Theory responsibility and engagement, Greenleaf, Sheffield. P.p: 201–215.
Schaltegger, S. & Burritt, R. (2005). Corporatesustainability.In The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics. 2005/2006: A survey of current issues Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, P.p: 185–22.
Schaltegger, S. & Wagner, M. (2006). Managing and measuring the business case for sustainability: Capturing the relationship between sustainability performance, business competitiveness and economic performance. In Managing the business case for sustainability: The integration of social, environmental and economic performance, (eds) S. Schaltegger and M. Wagner, Greenleaf, Sheffield, P.p: 1–27.
Smith, K. & Johnson, P. (1996). BusinessEthics and Business Behaviour. London: International Thomson Publishing Co, p. 28.
Steger, U. (2006). Building a business case for corporate sustainability. In: S. Schaltegger and M. Wagner, Editors, Managing the Business Case for Sustainability: The Integration of Social Environmental and Economic Performance, Greenleaf, Sheffield (2006), P.p: 412–443.
Taghizadeh, H. & Shokri, A. (2015). A comparative study of airline companies from the social responsibility perspective case study. InternationalJournalofSocial Sciences. Special Issue, P.p: 270-281.
Tsai, W. H. Hsu, J. L. (2008). corporate social responsibility programs choice and costs assessment in the airline industry-A hybrid model. Journal of Air Transport Management. V. 14, Issue 4, P.p: 188–196.
Tsoutsoura, M. (2004). CorporateSocialResponsibilityandFinancialPerformance, Working Paper. University of California, Haas School of Business, Berkeley, California, March, P.3.
Turban, D. B. & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees, Academy of Management Journal. V. 40, No. 3, P.p: 658–672.
Velde, V. E. Vermeir, W. & Corten, F. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibilityand Financial Performance, Finance and Accounting. V.5, No. 3, P.p: 129-138.
Wang, Q. Chong W. & Yang S. (2015). Evaluating Corporate Social Responsibility of Airlines Using Entropy Weight and Grey Relation Analysis. Vo. 42, January 2015, P.p: 55- 62.
Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: a company- level measurement approach for CSR, European Management Journal. No. 26, P.p: 247- 261.
Weihrich, H. & H. Koontz. (1993). Management: a Global Perspective”. McGrew- Hill, New York, Princeton Road, 10th ed, P. 66.