تأثیر برنامه آموزش و مهارت‌های پیشگیرانه‌ی خطرات کمال‌گرایی بر کمال‌گرایی زوجی و کیفیت رابطه زوج‌های عقدکرده
محورهای موضوعی : روش ها و مدل های روانشناختیغلامرضا رجبی 1 , یعقوب سروستانی 2 , منصور سودانی 3 , عباس امان الهی 4
1 - استاد، گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
2 - دانشجوی دکتری مشاوره، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
3 - استاد، گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
4 - دانشیار، گروه مشاوره، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز،اهواز، ایران.
کلید واژه: برنامه‌ی آموزش و مهارت‌های پیشگیرانه‌ی خطرات کمال‌گرایی, کمال‌گرایی در روابط زوجی, کیفیت رابطه, دوران عقد,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: این پژوهش با هدف تأثیر برنامه آموزش و مهارت‌های پیشگیرانه‌ی خطرات کمال‌گرایی بر کمال‌گرایی زوجی و کیفیت رابطه زوج های عقدکرده شهرستان رامهرمز انجام شد.
روش: این پژوهش در يک طرح نیمه‌آزمايشي با پیش‌آزمون، پس‌آزمون و پیگیری با گروه كنترل در سال 1402 انجام شد. جامعه این پژوهش شامل کلیه زوج‌های عقد کرده شهرستان رامهرمز بود که از این جامعه 30 زوج که نمره‌ی آنها در مقیاس کمال گرایی در روابط زوجی یک انحراف معیار بالاتر از میانگین بود، بر اساس ملاک‌های ورود و خروج از پژوهش به روش داوطلبانه انتخاب شدند و به طور تصادفی در دو گروه آزمایش (15 زوج) و کنترل (15زوج) قرار گرفتند. آزمودنی‌های گروه آزمایش در هشت جلسه نود دقیقه‌ای به صورت يک جلسه در هفته تحت برنامه آموزش پیش از ازدواج به روش اتکینز قرار گرفتند و گروه کنترل فقط در یک جلسه در مورد موضوعات مرتبط با ازدواج آموزش دیدند. سپس هر دو گروه در سه مرحله‌ی پیش‌آزمون، پس‌آزمون و پیگیری با استفاده از مقیاس کمال‌گرایی در روابط زوجی شیا و همکاران و سیاهه کیفیت اَبعاد زندگی زناشویی فلچر مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفتند. داده‌ها با استفاده از روش آماری تحلیل واريانس با اندازه‌گیری‌های تکراری (آمیخته) در نرم‌افزار 22-SPSS تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که برنامه‌ی آموزش و مهارت‌های پیشگیرانه‌ی خطرات کمال‌گرایی منجر به کاهش کمال‌گرایی در روابط زوجی در گروه آزمایش نسبت به گروه کنترل نشده است، اما این روش آموزشی باعث بهبود کیفیت روابط زوجین گروه آزمایش نسبت به گروه کنترل از مرحله پیش‌آزمون به پس‌آزمون و پیگیری شده است.
نتیجه‌گیری: برنامه‌ی آموزش و مهارت‌های پیشگیرانه‌ی خطرات کمال‌گرایی می‌تواند به عنوان یک برنامه مفید و مناسب برای آموزش قبل از ازدواج و به ویژه برای بهبود کیفیت رابطه زوجین مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
Background and purpose: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of the preventive education and skills program perils of perfection on dyadic perfectionism and relationship quality in engaged couples of Ramhormoz city.
Methods: The study was conducted in a quasi-experimental design with pretest, posttest, and follow-up with control group in 2023 year. The population of this study included all engaged couples of Ramhormoz city in 2023 year, that 30 engaged couple among these couples were selected using voluntary sampling method and score of one standard deviation higher than of mean in dyadic perfectionism scale and inclusive and exclude criteria to research, and were assigned randomly to experimental (15 couples) and control (15 couples) groups. Subjects in the experimental group participated in eight ninety-minute weekly sessions of the preventive education and skills program perils of perfection on dyadic perfectionism based on Atkins method, and subjects the control group received training about marriage issues only one session, and both groups were assessed in three stages (pre-test, post-test and 45-day follow-up) using Dyadic Perfectionism Scale of Xia et al., and Fletcher's Marital Life Dimensions Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance statistical method (mixed) and SPSS-22 Statistical Software Package for social science.
Findings: The results showed that the education program and preventive skills of the dangers of perfectionism did not lead to the reduction of perfectionism in couple relationships in the experimental group compared to the control group, but this education method improved the quality of the relationships of couples in the experimental group compared to the control group from pre-test to post-test and followed-up.
Conclusion: The education program and preventive skills of the dangers of perfectionism can be used as a useful and suitable program for education before marriage and especially for improving the quality of the couple's relationship.
1. Schofield MJ, Mumford N, Jurkovic I, Jurkovic D, Chan SP, Bickerdike A. Understanding profiles of couples attending community-based couple counseling and relationship education services. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2015; 14(1): 64-90.
2. Duncan SF, Goddard HW. Family life education: Principles and practices for effective outreach: Sage Publications; 2016.
3. Dyer C, Halford WK. Prevention of relationship problems: Retrospect and prospect. Behavior Change. 1998; 15(2): 107-25.
4. Berger R, Hannah MT. Preventive approaches in couple’s therapy: Routledge; 2013.
5. Kim Halford W. The future of couple relationship education: Suggestions on how it can make a difference. Family Relations. 2004; 53(5): 559-66.
6. Guerrero LK, Andersen PA, Afifi WA. Close encounters: Communication in relationships: Sage Publications; 2017.
7. Atkins J. The perils of perfection: A preventative education and skills training program on perfectionism for premarital couples: Chicago School of Professional Psychology; 2007.
8. Shahbazi M, Koraei A, Kianijam N. Marital standards and relationship attributions as
predictors of women's marital adjustment and non-adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology. 2021; 4(2): 29-42. (Persian)
9. AsadiShishegaran S, Ghamari H, Sheikholslamy A. The effect o communication skills training on constructive and non-constructive conflict resolution styles in engagements. Biannual Journal of Applied Counseling. 2016; 6(1): 77-88. (Persian)
10. Davarniya R, Zahrakar K, Nazari AM. The effectiveness of brief solution-focused couple
therapy (BSFCT) on reducing couple burnout. Journal of Research and Health. 2018; 8(2): 123-31. (Persian)
11. Ebrahimi S, Goudarzi M, Isanejad O. The effectiveness of pre-marriage counseling through the couples care program «CARE» on expectations and communicational beliefs in marriage applicants. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2019; 9(1): 217-36. (Persian)
12. Möller AT, Rabe HM, Nortje C. Dysfunctional beliefs and marital conflict in distressed and non-distressed married individuals. Journal of rational-emotive and cognitive-behavior therapy. 2001; 19: 259-70.
13. Bradbury TN, Fincham FD, Beach SR. Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of marriage and family. 2000; 62(4): 964-80.
14. Shahi A, Ghaffari I, Ghasemi K. Relationship between mental health and marital satisfaction. Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. 2011; 15(2): e79378, 119-126. (Persian)
15. Baucom DH, Epstein N, Rankin LA, Burnett CK. Assessing relationship standards: the inventory of specific relationship standards. Journal of Family Psychology. 1996; 10(1): 72-88.
16. Flett GL, Hewitt PL. Perfectionism and maladjustment: An overview of theoretical, definitional, and treatment issues. In G. L. Flett & P. L. Hewitt (Eds.), Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–31). American Psychological Association. ; 2002.
17. Arcuri A. Dyadic perfectionism, communication patterns and relationship quality in couples. The degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Windsor; 2013.
18. Lopez FG, Fons-Scheyd A, Bush-King I, McDermott RC. A latent class analysis of dyadic perfectionism in a college sample. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2011; 44(1): 32-51.
19. Slaney RB, Pincus AL, Uliaszek AA, Wang KT. Conceptions of perfectionism and interpersonal problems: Evaluating groups using the structural summary method for circumplex data. Assessment. 2006; 13(2): 138-53.
20. Stober J, Stober FS. Domains of perfectionism: Prevalence and relationships with perfectionism, gender, age, and satisfaction with life. Personality and Individual Differences. 2009; 46: 530-535.
21. Rajabi Gh, Gheisary S, Amanelahi A, Sodani M. The effectiveness of the Adlerian-based premarital education program on female students’ constraining beliefs regarding mate Selection. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2021; 11(4): 1-22. (Persian)
22. Rajabi G, Abbasi Gh, Sodani M, Aslani K. Premarital education program based on premarital interpersonal choices and knowledge program on idealistic marital expectation in single students. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry & Clinical Psychology. 2016; 22 (3): 212-221. (Persian)
23. Rajabi G, Abbasi Gh, Sodani M, Aslani K.
The addictiveness of Premarital education program based on premarital interpersonal choices and knowledge in bachelor students. Journal of Family Counseling & Psychotherapy. 2016; 6(1): 79-97. (Persian)
24. Rajabi G, Mahmoudi O, Aslani K, Amanollahi A. Effectiveness of premarital education program based on premarital interpersonal choices and knowledge program in reducing fear of marriage and increasing the marriage motivation of single students. Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. 2017; 21(3): 108-114. (Persian)
25. Rajabi Gh, Abbasi GH, Sodani M, Aslani K. The effectiveness of premarital education based on relationship education program on reducing the dysfunctional relationship beliefs of single students. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 2018; 9(2): 1-15. (Persian)
26. Rajabi G, Abbasi Gh. The effectiveness of premarital counseling based on a relationship education program on the idealistic expectations of single young adults. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry & Clinical Psychology. 2020; 25(4): 384-395. (Persian)
27. Rajabi G, Khandade A. Effect of premarital education based on idealistic Marital expectation's on reducing Idealistic marital expectation's in marriage Applicant couples: A single case study. Psychological Methods and Models. 2021; 12(43): 14-30. (Persian)
28. Shea AJ, Slaney RB, Rice KG. Perfectionism in intimate relationships: The dyadic almost perfect scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2006; 39(2): 107-25.
29. Arcuri A. Dyadic perfectionism, communication patterns and relationship quality in couples; 2013.
30. Ghani Abadi S, Falah Zadeh H, Mostafa V. Predicting emotional divorce based on dyadic perfectionism and resilience in women. The Quarterly Journal of Woman and Family Studies. 2024; 11(4): 62-83.
31. Fletcher GJ, Simpson JA, Thomas G. The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000; 26(3): 340-54.
32. Ghazanfari B, Keshavarzi Arshadi F, Hassani F, Emamipour S. Effectiveness of couple therapy based on Choice Theory on conflict resolution styles and marital relationship quality of incompatible couples. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2018; 12(1): 47-62. (Persian)
33. Nilforooshan P, Ahmadi A, Fatehizadeh M, Reza Abedi M, Ghasemi V. The simultaneous effects of general factor of personality and attachment dimensions on marital quality. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2014; 4(3): 473-507. (Persian)
34. Winer BJ. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: MacGraw-Hill; 1962. https:// https://toaz.info/doc-view-2
35. Stoeber J. Dyadic perfectionism in romantic relationships: Predicting relationship satisfaction and longterm commitment. Personality and individual differences. 2012; 53(3): 300-305.
36. Fons-Scheyd AL. Further validation of a measure of dyadic perfectionism: University of Houston; 2007.
37. Haring M, Hewitt PL, Flett GL. Perfectionism, coping, and quality of intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2003; 65(1): 143-58.
38. Azimi Khoei A, Zahrakar K, Ahmadi K. The effectiveness of premarital education based on the prevention and relationship enhancement program (PREP) on communication beliefs and attitudes toward marriage of couples on the Verge of Marriage. Islamic Life Journal. 2021; 4: 63-73.
39. Ghezelseflo M, Rostami M. Comparison of the effectiveness of Gottman-based premarital training and the SYMBIS model on the patterns and damages of Turkmen Engagement Couples. Journal of Family Psychology. 2021; 8(1): 47-64.
40. Ebrahimi S, Goudarzi M, Isanejad O. The effectiveness of pre-marriage counseling through the couples care program «CARE» on expectations and communicational beliefs in marriage applicants. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2019; 9(1): 217-36.