تحلیل شاخص های توسعه پایدار شهری بر عملکرد محلات شهری (مطالعه موردی: محلات شهر بناب)
توسعه پایدار شهری بر عملکرد محلات شهری
محورهای موضوعی : جغرافیای نابرابری
آزاده اربابی سبزواری
1
(عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اسلامشهر)
حامد آل اسماعیل
2
(گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد اسلامشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسلامشهر، ایران)
کلید واژه: کارایی, محلات شهری, توسعه پایدار شهری, تحلیل پوششی داده ها, بناب ,
چکیده مقاله :
شهرها به عنوان عامل اصلی ایجاد کننده ناپایداری در جهان به شمار می¬روند و به دنبال تغییر در شرایط و عوامل گسترش و توسعه شهري بحث از پایداری و توسعه پایدار بدون توجه به محله¬هاي مسکونی شهرها و شهرنشینی بی¬معنی خواهد بود. هدف از این تحقیق تحلیل و ارزیابی شاخص¬های توسعه پایدار شهری بر عملکرد محلات شهر بناب می¬باشد. مقاله حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی- توسعه¬ای و از لحاظ روش تحقيق، توصیفی- تحلیلی است ابزار گردآوري اطلاعات براي بررسي معيارهاي توسعه پایدار شهری در قالب سه شاخص منتخب كلي و 57 شاخص فرعی توسعه پایدار شهری مي¬باشد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات از مدل¬های کمی ضریب همبستگی پیرسون، رگرسیون چند متغیره، تحلیل پوششی داده¬ها، کارایی متقاطع، تحلیل حساسیت و از نرم افزارهای Spss و Dea slover استفاده شده است. نتایج حاصله از این پژوهش نشان¬داد که با توجه به شاخص‌های ورودی و خروجی توسعه پایدار شهری 8 محله (4، 5، 6، 7، 9، 10، 11، 13)، با میزان کارایی کمتر از یک درصد به عنوان محلات ناکارا و 5 محله(1، 2، 3، 6، 8)، با میزان کارایی یک درصد به عنوان واحد کارا از لحاظ شاخص¬های توسعه پایدار شهری شناخته می‌شوند. که از عوامل مهم ناكارايي محلات، استفادة بسيار زياد از ورودي¬ها در قبال توليد اندك خروجي هاست. توزیع فضایی نامناسب فعاليت¬ها و تسهيلات و خدمات شهري در سطح شهر، ﺗﻔﺎوت در ﺳﻄﺢ زﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺷﻬﺮوﻧﺪان، ناهماهنگي ميان ارگان¬های و سازمان¬ها¬ي مرتبط با برنامه¬ريزي در شهر بناب و عدم استفاده بهینه از امكانات از عواملی است كه تفاوت در ميزان عملکرد محلات را در پي دارد. در این بین محلات ناکارا باید شاخص‌های ورودی خود را تغییر دهند تا به سمت توسعه پایدار شهری سوق یابند. توزیع فضایی نامناسب فعاليت¬ها و تسهيلات و خدمات شهري در سطح شهر، ﺗﻔﺎوت در ﺳﻄﺢ زﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺷﻬﺮوﻧﺪان، ناهماهنگي ميان ارگان¬های و سازمان¬ها¬ي مرتبط با برنامه¬ريزي در شهر بناب و عدم استفاده بهینه از امكانات از عواملی است كه تفاوت در ميزان عملکرد محلات را در پي دارد. در این بین محلات ناکارا باید شاخص‌های ورودی خود را تغییر دهند تا به سمت توسعه پایدار شهری سوق یابند.
Introduction: Cities are considered to be the main cause of instability in the world, and following the change in urban development and development factors, the discussion of sustainability and sustainable development regardless of residential neighborhoods and uncertain urbanization will be. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze the indicators of sustainable urban development on the performance of Bonab neighborhoods. Methods:. The present article is a descriptive-analytical in terms of practical purpose and is a descriptive-analytical method for examining the criteria of sustainable urban development in the form of three selected indicators and 57 sub-indicators of urban sustainable development. For information analysis, Pearson correlation coefficients, multivariate regression, data cover analysis, cross -performance, sensitivity analysis, and SPSS and dea Slover software have been used. Results and Discussion: The results of this study showed that due to the input indicators and output of sustainable urban development of 8 neighborhoods (4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13), with an efficiency less than one percent As an inefficient neighborhoods and 5 neighborhoods (1, 2, 3, 6, 8), they are recognized as an efficient unit in terms of sustainable urban development indicators. One of the most important factors in neighborhoods is a great use of inputs against the production of small outputs. Conclusion: Inappropriate spatial distribution of urban activities and facilities and services across the city, the life of the livestock, the inconsistencies between the organs and organizations associated with the planning in the city of Bonab, and the lack of optimal use of factors. That is the difference in the performance of neighborhoods. In the meantime, inefficient neighborhoods must change their input indicators to move towards sustainable urban development. Conclusion: Inappropriate spatial distribution of urban activities and facilities and services across the city, the life of the livestock, the inconsistencies between the organs and organizations associated with the planning in the city of Bonab, and the lack of optimal use of factors. That is the difference in the performance of neighborhoods. In the meantime, inefficient neighborhoods must change their input indicators to move towards sustainable urban development.
راه حل اصلي رفع نابرابريها و رساندن محلههای ناكارای شهر بناب به مرز كارايي، پيروي از موازين عدالت اجتماعي در همة ابعاد شهری است.
Akbari, M. (2013). The Role of the Middle Cities in Regional Development, Masters Thesis, under the guidance of Dr. Mirjaf Mousavi, Payam Noor University in Rasht. (in Persian)
Ameen, R. F. M. & Mourshed, M. (2017). Urban environmental challenges in developing countries—A stakeholder perspective, Habitat International, 64, 1–10.
Ameen, R. F. M. & Mourshed, M. (2019). Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process, Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 356–366.
Amoushahi, S., Salmanmahiny, A., Moradi, H., Mikaeili Tabrizi, A. R., & Galán, C. (2023). An Analysis of the Importance of Sustainable Urban Development Indicators in Iran and its Comparison With Global Indicators. Town and Country Planning, 15(1), 53-71. (in Persian)
Arab Ameri, R., Arghan, ,. A., & kamyabi, S. (2020). Comparative Study and Analysis of the Effects of Neighborhood Sustainability Indicators Case Study: New City of Rudian. Sustainable city, 3(3), 17-32. (in Persian)
Azani, M., Mokhtary Malek Abadi, R., & Haji Aghajooni Kashy, S. (2014). Investigating the Local Sustainable Development Indicator (Case Study Isfahan Region 1). Spatial Planning, 4(2), 129-152.
Barrow, Th. G. (1997). Sustainable Development: Concept, Value and Practice, Translated by Seyyed Ali Badri, Journal of Geographical Research, No. 44, Mashhad. (in Persian)
Cappa, F., Franco S., & Rosso, F. (2022). Citizens and cities: Leveraging citizen science and big data for sustainable urban development. Business Strategy and the Environment. 31(2), 648-667.
Dehbalaei M, Memarzadeh Tehran G, Danesahfard K. (2023). Key Factors in Evaluating the Implementation of the Sustainable Urban Development Policy in the Framework of the Sixth Plan. GeoRes. 38 (2) :161-170. (in Persian)
Environmental Consulting Engineers. (2003). Preliminary Studies of Bonab City Detailed Plan, First Stage, Housing and Urban Development Organization of East Azerbaijan Province. (in Persian)
Faivre, N., Fritz, M., Freitas, T., de Boissezon, B., & Vandewoestijne, S. (2017). “Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challengesˮ, Environmental Research, 159, 509–518.
Haidar, E. A. & Bahammam, A. S. (2021). An optimal model for housing projects according to the relative importance of affordability and sustainability criteria and their implementation impact on initial cost, Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102535.
Hansson S., Arfvidsson, H., & Simon, D. (2019). Governance for sustainable urban development: The double function of SDG indicators. Area Development and Policy. 4(3), 217-235.
Hekmatniya, H., & Mousavi. M. (2006). Evaluation of Sustainable Urban Development Indicators in Yazd City, First Geography Conference and 21st Century, Islamic Azad University of Najaf Abad Branch. (in Persian)
Iran Statistical Center, Statistical Yearbook of East Azerbaijan Province, 2011. (in Persian)
Kalantari Khalil Abad, H., Abu Bakri, T., Qaderi, R., & Pourali, M. A. (2012). Evaluation of the Recommendation of Urban Development Indicators in the Border Regions (Case: Piranshahr City), City Management Quarterly, 10 (30), 221-207. (in Persian)
Kaur, H., & Garg, P. (2019). Urban sustainability assessment tools: A review, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol 210, 146-158.
Latifi, G. (2003). Sustainable Urban Development of Cultural Development, Journal of Social Sciences (Special Urban Planning), 22, 13-25. (in Persian)
Masoumi, S. (2006). Neighborhood Development in line with the sustainability of Tehran's metropolis, community and culture publications. (in Persian)
Michalina, D., Mederly, P., Diefenbacher, H., Held, B. (2021). Sustainable Urban Development: A Review of Urban Sustainability Indicator Frameworks. Sustainability, 13, 9348.
Mosa Kazemi, M. M. (2008). Evaluation of Sustainable Development in Urban Development, Research Case: Qom City, Human Geography Thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University. (in Persian)
Parzen, I., Kirkabadi, Z., & Argan, A. (2017). Stability Analysis of Urban Neighborhoods Based on Sustainable Development Indicators (Mahabad City Case). New Attitudes in Human Geography (Human Penalties), 9 (2), 107-124. (in Persian)
Rahimi, H. (2004). Introduction to Geography and Sustainable Development, Euclid Publishing, Mashhad. (in Persian)
Safaralizadeh E, Akbari M, Boostan Ahmadi V, &Mousavi, C. (2022). Investigating the Indices of Social Capital and its Relationship with Sustainable Urban Development. jgs 22 (66), 105-123. (in Persian)
Schumacher, O. F. (1999). The small little is beautiful; Human Dimensions Economics, translated by Ali Ramin, Soroush Publications (IRIB), Tehran. (in Persian)
Sepahvand, R., & Arefnejad, M. (2013). Prioritization of indicators of urban permanent development with a group Analytic hierarchy process: A case study in Isfahan city. Urban Structure and Function Studies, 1(1), 43-59. (in Persian)
Shakouei, Hussein. (2003). New Thoughts in Geography Philosophy The Second Volume of Environmental Philosophies and Geographical Schools, Tehran, Institute of Geographical and Guitcology.
Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). Detailed Results of Census of Population and Housing County. (in Persian)
Stouten, P. (2014) Features for Sustanable Urban Neighborhood Development, Department of Urbanism, Faculty of Architecture Delft University of Technology Delft, Netherlands, Int Journal for Housing Science, 38(2), 71-79.
United Nations (2019). World Urbanization Prospects (The 2018 Revision). ST/ESA/SER.A/420.
Zali, N., & Ashrafi, S. (2013). An Investigation of Economic Globalization Role on Metropolitan’s Sustainable Development. Strategic Studies of public policy, 4(11), 1-16. (in Persian)
Zhang, D., Pee, LG., Pan, SL., Cui, L. (2022). Big data analytics, resource orchestration, and digital sustainability: A case study of smart city development. Government Information Quarterly. 39(1):101626.
Ziairi, K. A. (1999). Principles and Methods of Regional Planning, Yazd University Publications.
Ziairi, K. A. (2002). Urban Land Use Planning, Yazd University Press. (in Persian)