سنجش میزان بور در محیط‌های آبی حاوی Zannichellia palustris و Ruppia maritime با شوری‌های متفاوت
محورهای موضوعی : آب و محیط زیست
امیر پرنیان
1
(استادیار، مرکز ملی تحقیقات شوری، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، یزد، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات))
مصطفی چُرم
2
(استاد، گروه علوم و مهندسی خاک، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.)
نعمت اله جعفرزاده حقیقی فرد
3
(استاد، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی جندی شاپور اهواز، اهواز، ایران.)
کلید واژه: آب‌‌های شور, زانشیلیا, پالایش بور, روپیا,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: وجود زه آب های شور و آلوده از مشکلات زیست محیطی مناطق جنوبی ایران است که اغلب به تالاب های منطقه می ریزد. لذا این پژوهش با هدف پالایش بور از سه محیط آبی با شوری متفاوت توسط دو گیاه آبزی بومی تالاب های جنوب ایران انجام گرفت.روش بررسی: در این پژوهش در سال 1393، طی 120 ساعت پالایش آب آبیاری و دو نوع زه آب مختلف آلوده شده به 4 سطح غلظتی مختلف بور (1، 2، 5 و 10 میلی گرم در لیتر)، توسط دو گیاه آبزی (Zannichellia palustris L. وRuppia maritima L.) بررسی شد.یافته ها: نتایج نشان داد که در آب غیرشور گیاهان Zannichellia palustris و Ruppia maritime بور را به مقدار قابل توجهی جذب و کارایی حذف بور در هر دو گیاه به بیش از 70% رسید، همچنین شاخص جذب بور در دو گیاه زانیشلیا و روپیا به ترتیب 51/0 تا 16/8 و 18/0 تا 14/8 میلی گرم در ظرف در بازه ی آلودگی مورد مطالعه به دست آمد که این مقادیر در زه آب های شور افزایش یافت. شاخص تولید زیست توده گیاهی زانیشلیا با افزایش آلودگی بور کاهش داشت، اما این روند در مورد روپیا مشاهده نشد که نشان از مقاومت بیشتر روپیا به آلودگی بور است.بحث و نتیجه گیری: کارایی پالایش بور در زانیشلیا بیش از روپیا ولی اثر منفی شوری بر زانیشلیا بیش از روپیا بود. نتایج به دست آمده در این پژوهش توان پالایندگی بور توسط گیاهان زانیشلیا و روپیا در آب های شور را تایید می کند.
Background and Objective: Existing of brackish and polluted drainage is one of the environmental problems in the southern Iran region, and also many of these drainages move down to the local wetlands. So the aim of this study was B remediation from three aqueous solutions with different salinities, by two native hydrophytes of Iran’s southern wetlands.Material and Methodology: In this study, during 120 hours treatment of waters with distinct salinity that contaminated with four different B levels (1, 2, 5, and 10 mg per liter of water), B remediation by two hydrophytes (Zannichellia palustris L. and Ruppia maritima L.) were examined.Findings: The study showed for non-saline water plant uptake a high amount of B and both plant removal efficiency achieved more than 70%. The uptake index of Z. palustris and R. maritima respectively were 0.51 – 8.16 and 0.18 – 8.14 mg pot-1 but these values increased in the saline waters. Biomass production measurement of Z. palustris decreased by increasing B contamination but R. maritima was not affected, and it showed the higher B tolerance of R. maritima.Discussion and Conclusion: Totally, Z. palustris removed more B than R. maritima but the bad effect of salinity on R. maritima less than Z. palustris. The results approved the ability of both plants for B remediation in saline waters.
1. Ongley ED. Control of water pollution from agriculture: Food & Agriculture Org.; 1996.
2. Wolska J, Bryjak M. Methods for boron removal from aqueous solutions — A review. Desalination. 2013;310(0):18-24.
3. ISIRI. Drinking water - Physical and chemical specifications. Tehran, Iran: Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran; 2010. p. 1-18. (In Persian)
4. Rainey CJ, Nyquist LA, Christensen RE, Strong PL, Culver BD, Coughlin JR. Daily boron intake from the American diet. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1999;99(3):335-40.
5. Şimşek A, Korkmaz D, Velioǧlu YS, Ataman OY. Determination of boron in hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry and spectrophotometry. Food chemistry. 2003;83(2):293-6.
6. Mel’nik L, Butnik I, Goncharuk V. Sorption-membrane removal of boron compounds from natural and waste waters: Ecological and economic aspects. Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology. 2008;30(3):167-79.
7. Wyness A, Parkman R, Neal C. A summary of boron surface water quality data throughout the European Union. Science of the total environment. 2003; 314: 255-69.
8. Badruk M, Kabay N, Demircioglu M, Mordogan H, Ipekoglu U. Removal of boron from wastewater of geothermal power plant by selective ion-exchange resins. I. Batch sorption–elution studies. Separation science and technology. 1999; 34(13):2553-69.
9. Melnyk L, Goncharuk V, Butnyk I, Tsapiuk E. Boron removal from natural and wastewaters using combined sorption/membrane process. Desalination. 2005;185(1):147-57.
10. Loizou E, Kanari PN, Kyriacou G, Aletrari M. Boron determination in a multi element national water monitoring program: the absence of legal limits. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit. 2010;5(3-4):459-63.
11. Marín CMD-C, Oron G. Boron removal by the duckweed Lemna gibba: a potential method for the remediation of boron-polluted waters. Water research. 2007;41(20):4579-84.
12. Schröder P, Navarro-Aviñó J, Azaizeh H, Goldhirsh AG, DiGregorio S, Komives T, et al. Using phytoremediation technologies to upgrade waste water treatment in Europe. Environmental Science and Pollution Research-International. 2007;14(7):490-7.
13. Fox L, Struik P, Appleton B, Rule J. Nitrogen phytoremediation by water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms). Water, air, and soil pollution. 2008;194(1-4):199-207.
14. Kashem MA, Singh BR, Huq SI, Kawai S. Cadmium phytoextraction efficiency of arum (Colocasia antiquorum), radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) grown in hydroponics. Water, air, and soil pollution. 2008;192(1-4):273-9.
15. Ghahreman A. Flora of IRAN. Tehran: Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands 250p-col illus Pe, En, Fr Icones, Maps Geog. 1997. (In Persian)
16. Yıldırım K, Kasım GÇ. Phytoremediation potential of poplar and willow species in small scale constructed wetland for boron removal. Chemosphere. 2018;194:722-36.
17. Xia J, Hua T, Xue Y, Zhao L, Sun H, Liu C. Myriophyllum elatinoides: A potential candidate for the phytoremediation of water with low level boron contamination. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;401:123333.
18. Türker OC, Baran T. A combination method based on chitosan adsorption and duckweed (Lemna gibba L.) phytoremediation for boron (B) removal from drinking water. International Journal of Phytoremediation. 2018;20(2):175-83.
19. Böcük H, Yakar A, Türker OC. Assessment of Lemna gibba L.(duckweed) as a potential ecological indicator for contaminated aquatic ecosystem by boron mine effluent. Ecological Indicators. 2013;29:538-48.
20. Türker OC, Böcük H, Yakar A. The phytoremediation ability of a polyculture constructed wetland to treat boron from mine effluent. Journal of hazardous materials. 2013;252:132-41.
21. Tatar ŞY, Öbek E. Potential of Lemna gibba L. and Lemna minor L. for accumulation of Boron from secondary effluents. Ecological Engineering. 2014;70:332-6.
22. Apha A. WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation. 2007.
23. Tu KL, Nghiem LD, Chivas AR. Boron removal by reverse osmosis membranes in seawater desalination applications. Separation and Purification Technology. 2010;75(2):87-101.
24. Kabay N, Güler E, Bryjak M. Boron in seawater and methods for its separation—a review. Desalination. 2010;261(3):212-7.
25. Edzwald JK, Haarhoff J. Seawater pretreatment for reverse osmosis: Chemistry, contaminants, and coagulation. Water research. 2011;45(17):5428-40.
26. Bakirdere S, Örenay S, Korkmaz M. Effect of boron on human health. Open Mineral Processing Journal. 2010;3(1):54-9.
27. Chorom M, Parnian A, Jaafarzadeh N. Nickel removal by the aquatic plant (Ceratophyllum demersum L.). International Journal of Environmental Science and Development. 2012;3(4):372.
28. Demiral T, Türkan I. Comparative lipid peroxidation, antioxidant defense systems and proline content in roots of two rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2005;53(3):247-57.
29. Wang D, Wen F, Xu C, Tang Y, Luo X. The uptake of Cs and Sr from soil to radish (Raphanus sativus L.)-potential for phytoextraction and remediation of contaminated soils. Journal of environmental radioactivity. 2012;110:78-83.
30. Parnian A, Chorom M, Jafarzadeh Haghighi Fard N, Dinarvand M. Biological Removal of Cadmium by Aquatic Macrophyte Lemna Gibba (A Potential Method for the Phytoremediation of Polluted Water and Wastewater). JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology. 2015;18(70):283-94. (In Persian)
31. Parneyan A, Chorom M, Haghighi-Fard NJ, Dinarvand M. Phytoremediation of nickel from hydroponic system by hydrophyte coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum L.). Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture. 2011;2(6):75-85. (In Persian)
32. Marschner H, Marschner P. Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants: Academic press; 2012.
33. Mengel K, Kosegarten H, Kirkby EA, Appel T. Principles of plant nutrition: Springer Science & Business Media; 2001.
34. Khellaf N, Zerdaoui M. Phytoaccumulation of zinc by the aquatic plant, Lemna gibba L. Bioresource technology. 2009;100(23):6137-40.
35. Supervision IRoIVPFSPa. Environmental criteria of treated waste water and return flow reuse. Tehran, Iran: Islamic Republic of Iran; 2010. p. 1-135. (In Persian)
36. Yilmaz DD. Effects of salinity on growth and nickel accumulation capacity of Lemna gibba (Lemnaceae). Journal of hazardous materials. 2007;147(1-2):74-7.
37. Rostami H, Tabatabaei S, Zaare NF, Hajilou J. Effect of different boron concentrations on some vegetative and physiological characteristics of olive. Journal of Horticulture Science. 2013;27(1):18-26.
38. Parnian A, Chorom M, Jaafarzadeh N, Dinarvand M. Use of two aquatic macrophytes for the removal of heavy metals from synthetic medium. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology. 2016.
39. Hill MK. Understanding environmental pollution: Cambridge University Press; 2010.