شناسایی ابعاد اساسی بی‌تفاوتی سازمانی معلمان: پژوهشی ترکیبی

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

سهیلا جلیلیان ¹ , احسان عظیم پور ² , وجیهه نجاتی ³ , آذر شهری ⁴

1 - دانش‌ آموخته کارشناسی ارشد تحقیقات آموزشی، دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
2 - دانش آموخته دکتری برنامه ریزی درسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران.
3 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد تحقیقات آموزشی، دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.
4 - دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه کردستان، کردستان، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/12/29 تاریخ پذیرش : 1399/12/29 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/01/01

کلید واژه: معلمان ابتدایی, رتبه‌بندی, بی‌تفاوتی سازمانی, آموزش‌وپرورش,

چکیده مقاله :

مقدمه و هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدفِ شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی ابعاد اساسی بی­تفاوتی سازمانی در بین معلمان مدارس مقطع ابتدایی شهرستان فردیس انجام شده است.  روش شناسی پژوهش: رویکرد پژوهش آمیخته و با طرح اکتشافی بود. در بخش کیفی این پژوهش از روش نظریه برخاسته از داده­ها و در بخش کمی از روش توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی استفاده شد. روش نمونه­گیری در بخش کیفی هدفمند و در بخش کمی تصادفی طبقه­ای بود. نمونه آماری در بخش کیفی با در نظر گرفتن قانون اشباع نظری، تعداد 14 نفر و در بخش کمی، براساس فرمول کوکران تعداد 320 نفر بود. ابزار گردآوری داده­ها در بخش کیفی مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته و در بخش کمی، پرسشنامه محقق ساخته با 32 سؤال بود. در بخش کیفی برای دستیابی به روایی از چک کردن به وسیله شرکت‌کنندگان و برای تعیین پایایی از راهبرد تائید همکاران پژوهشی استفاده شد. در بخش کمی به‌منظور بررسی روایی پرسشنامه ازنظرات خبرگان استفاده شد، نتیجه آزمون آلفای کرونباخ 84/0 به دست آمد که نشان‌دهنده پایایی بالای پرسشنامه بود. روش تحلیل داده­ها در بخش کیفی، تحلیل محتوایی استقرایی با بهره­گیری از کدگذاری در سه سطح باز، محوری و انتخابی بود که 32 نشانگر و 9 بُعد (بی­تفاوتی ناشی از حوادث، بی­تفاوتی ناشی از علل مادی، بی­تفاوتی ناشی از عوامل روحی و روانی، بی­تفاوتی ناشی از علل مدیریتی، بی­تفاوتی ناشی از عدم مشارکت همکاران، بی­تفاوتی ناشی از اظهارنظر افراد غیرمتخصص، بی­تفاوتی ناشی از محیط کار، بی­تفاوتی ناشی از سازمان و بی­تفاوتی ناشی از حضور ارباب‌رجوع) شناسایی شد. در بخش کمی، از نرم‌افزار SPSS برای تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و آزمون فریدمن و از نرم‌افزار AMOS برای تحلیل عاملی تائیدی، معادله­ های ساختاری، تحلیل مسیر و برازش مدل بهره گرفته شد. یافته ­ها: نتایج تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی نشان داد که؛ با توجه به بار عاملی بالای هر یک از گویه­ ها، ابعاد بی­تفاوتی سازمانی معلمان تائید شد. براساس نتایج تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، مدل پژوهش مدلی روا می‌باشد و چهارچوب مناسبی را جهت بررسی ابعاد بی‌تفاوتی سازمانی معلمان ارائه می‌دهد. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که؛ بی­تفاوتی ناشی از اظهارنظر افراد غیرمتخصص مهم‌ترین بُعد بی­تفاوتی در بین معلمان می­باشد و سایر ابعاد در جایگاه­های بعدی قرار دارند.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Introduction: The present study aimed at recognition and classifying the basic dimensions of Organizational indifference among teachers of elementary schools in Fardis. research methodology: The research approach was mixed method with exploratory desigen. In qualitative part of the research, the Grounded Theory method and in quantitative part a descriptive survey type was used. Sampling method in qualitative part was purposive and in quantitative part was Random stratified. The statistical sample in qualitative part was 14 people, according to theoretical saturation law, and in quantitative part was 302 people according to the Cochran formula. The data collection tool in qualitative part was semi-structured interview and in quantitative part was researcher-made questionnaire with 32 questions. In qualitative part for achieving the validity from checking by contributors and to determine the reliability, approval strategy of research colleagues was used. In quantitative part expert's opinions were used to assess the validity and the result of Cronbach's alpha test was 0.84, which indicates a high reliability. The data analysis method In qualitative part was an inductive content analysis with using coding at three levels of open, axial, and selective. That 32 dependent variables and 9 dimension variables were listed (indifference due to accident, financial factors, emotional and mental affairs, management factors, Non-participation of colleagues, non-expert Comment, workplace, organization, and presence of the clients).In quantitative part, exploratory factor analysis was performed by spss software and verifiable factor analysis  and Friedman test, structural equations and path analysis by AMOS software . Findings: The results of exploratory factor analysis showed that Due to the high factor load of each item, the effective of all dimensions on the organizational indifference of teachers was confirmed. Based on the results of confirmatory factor analysis, the research model is a valid model and provides a suitable framework for investigating the dimensions of organizational indifference of teachers. The results also showed that; Indifference due to the comments of non-experts is the most important dimension of indifference among teachers and other dimensions are in the next positions.  

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Abid, G., Zahra, I., Ahmed, A. (2015), Mediated Mechanism Of Thriving At Work Between Perceived Organization Support, Innovative Work Behavior And Turnover Intention. Pakistan Journal Of Commerce And Social Sciences, 9(3): 982-998.


2. Abolfazli, E.,Yousefi Saidabadi, R. & Fallah, V.(2016). An Analytical Study On Indifference Management In Educational System Of Iran: Reflection On Expert's Opinions. International Review, 1-2, 22-37.


3. .Aghelzadeh, V., & Soleimani, T. (2017). The Impact Of Organizational Indifference On Job Performance (Case Study: Elementary Teachers Of Ardebil City). National Conference On Modern Research In Management, Economics And Humanities, University Of Islamic Azad Of Kazeroon. (In Persian).


4. Aghelzadeh, V., & Soleimani, T. (2017). The Effect Of Organizational Indifference Onorganizational Indifference (Case Study: Elementary Teachers Of Ardebil City). National Conference On Modern Research In Management, Economics And Humanities, University Of Islamic Azad Of Kazeroon. (In Persian).


5. Ahmadi, S. A. A., & Fattahi, M. (2016). Investigating Factors Of Organization Indifference And Proper Strategies In Iran Infrastructural Communications Company. International Business Management, 10(6), 968-973. Doi:      3923/Ibm.2016.968.973.

August 10, 2016, From Http://Www.Michaelleestallard.Com/The-          Indifferent-Workplace.

6. Barney, J, B. (1991), Firm Resources And Sustained Competitive Advantage: Journal Of Management, 17, 99-120.


7. Beikzadeh, J., & Rahmati, Kh,. (2016). The Impact Of Job Fatigue Talent On Teachers Indifference In Secondary Schools In    Maragheh, Third International Conference On Management        And Economics. (In Persian).


8. Danaeefard, H., & Eslami, A. (2010). Discovering Theory Of Organizational Indifference: A Grounded Theory Strategy. European Journal Of Scientific Research, 40(3), 450-460.


9. Danaeifard, H., & Eslami, A. (2011). Build The Theory Of Organizational Indifference: Applying Fundamental Data     Theory Research Strategy To Practice. Tehran, Univesity Of Imam         Sadegh; 450-460. (In Persian).


10. Danaeifard, H., Hasanzadeh, A., & Salarieh, N. (2010). Designing A Measure Of: Mixed Research. Journal Of Strategic Management Thought, 4(2); 79- 99. (In Persian).


11. , A. (2007). Organizational Indifference: Fundamental Conceptualization Strategy, Master Thesis, Supervisor: Professor Hasan Danaei Fard, University Of  Allameh Tabatabaei. (In Persian).


12. Homan, H.A. (2011).Structural Equation Modeling Using Lisrel Software. Tehran: Samt. (In Persian).


13. Jamshidi, M,. & Bakhshi, N. (2010). From Neglect To Indifference: A Theoretical Explanation Of The Problem Of Organizational Indifference, National Conference On Management And Leadership Challenges In Iranian Organizations, University Of Islamic Azad Of    Science And Research Branch Of Isfahsn, 24september. (In Persian).


14. Keefe, , (2003). "How To Overcome Organizational Indifference: Women In Business" , 55,Pg220.


15. Lamastro, V. (2013). Commitment And Perceived Organizational Support, National Forum Of Applied Educational Research Journal, 24(3). Retrieved June 26, 2013.


16. Leander, P, N .(2009) .Losing The Will: Automatic Reactions To The Indifference Perceived In Others. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Duke Universit.


17. Masoudneia, A. (2001). Explaining The Sociological Indifference Of Citizens To Political And Social Life. Journal Of Political- Economic Information, 167(168); P. 152- 165. (In Persian).


18. Mccarthy, I., Hannah, D., Pitt, L., & Mccarthy, J.(2020). Confronting  Indifference Toward Truth: Dealing With Workplace Bullshit. Journal Of Business Horizons, 20(2),           1- 11.


19. Meyer, Hd.(1995). Organizational Environments And Organizational Discourse: Bureaucracy Between Two Worlds. Organization 6(1):32-43.


20. Moslemi, M., Ghorbani, R., & Mohsenie Azghandi, M. (2016). Investigating The Relationship Between Job Burnout And Organizational Indifference To Mapna Staff. International Conference On Modern Management On The Horizon 1404. (In Persian).


21. , A. (2007). Causes Of Indifference In Employees And Coping Methods: Journal Of Export Bank Of Iran, 45. (In Persian).


22. Rafiei, M., & Ahmadi, S.A.A. (2017). The Effect Of Emotional Intelligence On Organizational Indifference In Faculty Members Of Payame Noor University Of Tehran. Journal Of New Research In Management And Accounting, 5, P. 205- 228. (In Persian).


23. Rezaeian, A. (2000). Management Organization Basics. Tehran: Samt. (In Persian).


24. Robat, F. (2014). The Impact Of Job Stress And Organizational Indifference On Staff Performance. Master Thesis, Supervisor: Ahmadreza Sanjari, University Of Allameh Tabatabaei, Faculty Of Management And Accounting. (In Persian).


25. Salehi, R., Nemati, M., & Amanpoor, S. (2014). Investigationg The Effect Of Social Capital Indicators On Tge Ideal Urban Governance Using Amos (Case Study: Nasim City). Journal Of Spatial Planning Geography, 4(1): P. 1- 24. (In Persian).


26. Shaemiebarzki, A., Abzari, M., & Moaiedi, Z. (2016). The Effect Of Job Characteristics On Organizational Apathy With Mediator Role Of Individual- Organization Fit (Case Study: Isfahan Gas Company. Journal Of Organizational Culture Management, 14(3); 693- 719. (In Persian).


27. Shahdosti, L. (2011). The Role Of Home Environment Variables, Student Background,School Atmosphere And Teaching Process In Mathematics Development Of Third Grade Elementary Students Based On Thames Studies (2007). Master Thesis, Supervisor: Professor Nezamaldin Pahakg, University Of Shahid Madani.(In Persian).


28. Shahinpoor, N., Matt, B. (2007). "The Power Of One: Dissent And Organizational Life". Journal Of Business Ethics, 1,P.37 – 48.


29. Shekari, Gh., Oleiaei, L., Kheerkhah, M., & Hashemzehi, R. (2016). The Factors Affecting In Organizational Indifference (Case Study: Khorasan Regional Electricity Company). Journal Of Public Administration Governmental, 7(22); P. 71- 81. (In Persian).


30. Spreitzer, G., Porath, C.L., Gibson, C.B. (2012), Toward Human Sustainability: How To Enable More Thriving At Work. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2): 155-162.


31. Stallard, M. L. (2010, January 13). The Indifferent Workplace. Helping Leaders Create Cultures That Connect. Retrieved From.


32. Tabaeian, Sh. (2005). Areas Of Indifference Of Teachers Of Isfahan High School According To Directors Orders. Journal Of Knowledge And Research In Educational Sciences, 7(8); P. 91- 100. (In Persian).


33. Taneva, S., Arnold, J. (2015), Hanging On Or Bowling Along? Thriving, Surviving And Performing In Late Career.


34. J., Salimi. Gh., & Sangi. F (2016). Investigation And Explanation Of Organizational Indifference Phenomena: Some Recommendations For Policy Making In Agricultural Training`S Management. Journal Of Agricultural Education Administration Research, No:36: 119- 130. (In Persian).