ویژگیهای کمیته حسابرسی و عملکرد بانک‌ها
محورهای موضوعی : راهبری شرکتی
محمد حسین فتحه
1
(استادیار گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران)
احمد حسن پور
2
(دانشجوی دکتری حسابداری گروه حسابداری، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران)
کلید واژه: راهبری شرکتی, کمیته حسابرسی, تخصص مالی, عملکرد بانک‌ها,
چکیده مقاله :
هیات مدیره به عنوان یکی از مهمترین ابعاد موثر راهبری شرکتی، بدلیل دارا بودن مکانیسم کلیدی برای کاهش تعارض بین سهامداران و مدیران، به عنوان ابزاری جهت جلوگیری از تعارض منافع بین بانک و تنظیم کننده قوانین در نظر گرفته می شود. هدف مطالعه حاضر بررسی تاثیر ویژگی های کمیته حسابرسی بر عملکرد بانک ها می باشد. جامعه آماری پژوهش، بانک های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران بوده که در دوره زمانی 7 ساله بین سال‌های 1394 الی 1400 مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. چهار متغیر وابسته در پژوهش حاضر جهت سنجش عملکرد بانک مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. نتایج حاصل از آزمون فرضیه های پژوهش نشان داد که بین تخصص مالی کمیته حسابرسی و بازده دارایی ها تاثیر مثبت و معنی داری وجود دارد اما استقلال، اندازه و نسبت حضور زنان در کمیته حسابرسی، تاثیر معنی داری بر بازده دارایی ها ندارد. نهایتا بیشترین تاثیر متغیرهای مستقل بر نسبت سود عملیاتی بانک ها بوده است.
T The board of directors is considered as one of the most important effective dimensions of corporate governance due to having a key mechanism to reduce the conflict between shareholders and managers, as a tool to prevent the conflict of interests between the bank and the law regulator. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of characteristics of audit committee on the performance of banks. The statistical population of the research was the banks admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange, which were examined in a 7-year period between 1394 and 1400. Four dependent variables were used in the present study to measure the performance of banks. The results of the research hypotheses test showed that there was a positive and significant effect between the financial expertise of the audit committee and the return on assets, but the independence, size and proportion of women in the audit committee did not have a significant effect on the return on assets. Finally, independent variables had the greatest impact on banks' operating profit ratios.
منابع :
References
Abernathy, J. L., Beyer, B., Masli, A., stefaniak, C. (2014). “The association between characteristics of audit committee accounting experts, audit committee chairs, and financial reporting timeliness, Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting.
Abbott,J,L., parker,S.,peter,F,G.,Raghunandan,k.(2010). “An Empirical Investigation of Audit Fees, Nonaudit Fees, and Audit Committees”. Contemporary Accounting Research, DOI: 10.1506/8YP9-P27G-5NW5- DJKK.
Afza, T. and Nazir, M.S. (2014), “Audit quality and firm value: a case of Pakistan”, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 7 No. 9, pp. 1803-1810.
Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R. and Nagel, S. (2012), “Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis”, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 971-1000.
Alqatamin, R.M. (2018), “Audit committee effectiveness and company performance”, Accounting and Finance Research, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 48-60.
Appiah, K. O., Amon, C. (2017). board audit committee and corporate insolvency, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol 18, No 3, Pp. 298-316.
Appuhani, R. (2018). the signaling role of audit committee characteristics and the cost of equity capital: Australian evidence, Pacific Accounting Review, Vol 30, No 3, Pp. 387-406.
Balagobei, S. (2017). audit committee and value relevance of accounting information of listed hotels and travels in Sri Lanka, Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, Vol 9, No 2, Pp. 387-398.
Balk, B.H. and Gort, M. (1993), “Decomposing learning by doing in new plants”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 101 No. 4, pp. 561-583.
Bhagat, S. and Black, B. (2008), “The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance”, The Business Lawyer, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 921-963.
Boyd, J.H., Smith, B.D., 1999. The use of debt and equity in optimal financial contracts. J. Financ. Intermediation 8 (4), 270–316.
Bradbury, M., (1990), The incentives for voluntary audit committee formation, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol.9, Iss.1, pp. 13-36.
Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of
Law and Economics , 16: 301 -325.
Gupta, N. and Mahakud, J. (2020a), “CEO characteristics and bank performance: evidence from India”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 1057-1093.
Green, D., (1994). Canadian audit committees and their contribution to corporate governance, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Vol.3, Iss.2, pp.135-151.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Karamanou, I., Vafeas, N.(2005). “The Association between Corporate Boards, Audit Committees, and Management Earnings Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis”. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 43, pp. 453-486.
Kalbers, L. P., & Fogarty, T. J. (1993). Audit committee effectiveness: An empirical investigation of the contribution of power. Auditing, 12(1), 24.
Liang, Q., Xu, P. and Jiraporn, P. (2013), “Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 37 No. 8, pp. 2953-2968.
Nguyen, Q., Dang, V., 2020. Audit committee structure and bank stability in Vietnam. ACRN J. Finance Risk Perspect. 8 (1), 240–255.
Nor, N. H., Nawawi, A., Salin, A. S. (2018). the impact of audit committee independence and auditor choice on firms’ investment level, Social Science & Humanities, Vol 26, No 3, Pp. 1433-1454.
Pucheta-Martínez, M.C., De Fuentes, C., 2007. The impact of audit committee characteristics on the enhancement of the quality of financial reporting: an empirical study in the Spanish context. Corporate Governance 15 (6), 1394–1412.
Sun, J., Liu, G., 2014. Audit committees’ oversight of bank risk-taking. J. Bank. Finance 40, 376–387.
Walt, N. & Ingley, C. (2003). Board Dynamics and the Influence of Professional Background, Gender and Ethnic Diversity of Directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11 (3), 218–234.
_||_