• Home
  • Seismic study and spatial observations of a & b – values for the different earthquake hazard zones of India

Share To

Article Url


Manuscript ID : IJES-1910-1388 (R4) Visit : 191 Page: 225 - 239

10.30495/ijes.2020.677472

20.1001.1.20088779.2020.12.4.1.3

Article Type: Original Research

Seismic study and spatial observations of a & b – values for the different earthquake hazard zones of India

Subject Areas : Mineralogy

Narayanakumar Somasundaram 1 , Surendra Nadh Somala 2 , Evgenii Rogozhin 3 , Svetlana Rodina 4

1 - Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, India
2 - Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, India
3 - Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia
4 - Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia

Received: 2019-10-21 Accepted : 2020-10-02 Published : 2020-10-01

Keywords: seismicity, frequency-magnitude distribution, Seismogenic zones, b-value,

Abstract :

This paper study the recent seismicity in Earthquake hazard zones in India. A large historical earthquake event catalog to cover the period of 1900-2018, the parameters date, time, latitude, longitude, depth and magnitude has been used to calculating frequency-magnitude distribution (b-value) of seismic hazard zones in India. To convert different magnitude scales into a single moment magnitude scale, the general orthogonal regression relation is used. Gamma distribution used for variable corrections also de-clustering method has used for removal of any non-Poisson distribution. The Indian seismic hazard zones are divided into five major seismic sources zones. The seismicity is characterized by Gutenberg-Richter relation. The parameter ‘b’ of FMD and relationship have been determined for these five seismic zones having different vulnerability environment. The ‘b’ values ranges between 0.43 to 1.16. The difference between the b parameters and seismic hazard level from seismic zones II to V considered for the study of high seismo-tectonic complexity and crustal heterogeneity, the parameter ‘a’ value changes accordingly the seismicity of the regions. The lowest b-values found in seismic zone II. The highest FMD b-value has been found in the seismic zone IV. Such high seismicity b-values may be associated with high heterogeneity. In this high b-value predict the low strength in the crust as well as seismic instabilities of that zone. These observations recommend not suggesting the location of important projects like atomic power stations, hydroelectric power stations, neutrino observatory projects, satellite town projects.

References:


  1. Abu El-Nader IF, Shater A, Hussein HM (2016) Mapping b-values beneath Abu Dabbab from June to August 2004 earthquake swam, NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics 5:403-412.   
    2.
  2. Andrezej K, Ansie S (2017) Estimation of the Frequency-Magnitude Gutenberg-Richter b-value without Making Assumptions on Levels of Completeness, Seismological Research Letters 88: 311-318.
    3.
  3. Chandrani S, Chadha RK (2010) Variations in the frequency-magnitude distribution of earthquake with depth in the Koyna-Warna regions, India, Elsevier Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 39:331-334.
    4.
  4. Chandrani S, Pankaj MB, Chadha RK (2008) Seismicity in the Koyna-Warna Reservoir Site in Western India: Fractal and b-value Mapping, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98:476-482.
    5.
  5. Chien-Chih C, Wei-Chien W, Yound-Fo C, Yih-Min W, Yuan-Hsi L (2006) A correlation between the b-value and the fractal dimension from the aftershock sequence of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake, Geophysical Journal International 167:1215-1219.
    6.
  6. El-Isa ZH, David WE (2014) Spatiotemporal variations in the b-value of earthquake magnitude-frequency distributions: Classification and causes, Tectonophysics 615-616.
    7.
  7. Emad AM, Hetty AL (2011) Variation of b-value in the earthquake frequency-magnitude distribution with depth in the intraplate regions, IJBAS-IJENS 11:29-37.
    8.
  8. Emile AO, Barbara AR (1994) On the variation of b-values with earthquake size, Elsevier, Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 87:55-76.
    9.
  9. Emmanuel JG, Douglas WB, Beth PS, Jaakko P, Bodo B (2008) Modern erosion rates in the High Himalayas of Nepal. Elsevier, ScienceDirect, Earth and Planetary Science Letters 267:482-494.
    10.
  10. Godano E, Lippiello E, Arcanelis L (2014) Variability of the b value in the Gutenberg-Richter distribution, Geophysical Journal International 199:1765-1771.
    11.
  11. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 34:185–188.
    12.
  12. Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 40:76.
    13.
  13. Jamie F, Stephan H, Robert BS (2009) Earthquake swarm and b-value characterization of the Yellowstone volcano-tectonic system, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 188, 260-276.
    14.
  14. Jochen W, Wiemer S (2005) Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95:684-698
    15.
  15. Khan PK (2005) Mapping of b-value Beneath the Shillong Plateau, Gondwana Research 8:271-276.
    16.
  16. Khan PK, Parthapratim C (2007) The seismic b-value and its correlation with Bouguer gravity anomaly over the Shillong Plateau area: Tectonic implications, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 29:136-147.
    17.
  17. Legrand D, Villagomez D, Yepes H, Calahorrano A (2004) Multifractal dimension and b value analysis of the 1998-1999 Quito swarm related to Guagua Pichincha volcano activity, Ecuador, Journal of Geophysical Research 109:1-9.
    18.
  18. Mallika K, Harsh G, Shashidhar D, Purnachandra RN, Amrita Y, Sunil R, Satyanarayana HVS, Srinagesh D (2013) Temporal variation of b value associated with M ~4 earthquakes in the reservoir-triggered seismic environment of the Koyna-Warna region, Western India, Journal of Seismology 17:189-195.
    19.
  19. Mori J, Abercrombie R (1997) Depth dependence of earthquake frequency-magnitude distributions in California: Implications for rupture initiation, Journal of Geophysics 102:081-090.
    20.
  20. Murru M, Montuori C, Wyss M, Privitera E (1999) The location of magma chambers at Mt. Etna, Italy, mapped by b-values, Geophysics Research Letter 26:2553-2556
    21.
  21. Nanjo KZ, Yoshida A (2018) A b map implying the first eastern rupture of the Nankai Trough earthquakes, Nature Communications 9:1-7.
    22.
  22. Olsson R (1999) An estimation of the maximum b-value in the Gutenberg-Richter relation, Geodynamics 27:547–552.
    23.
  23. Paiboon N, Ota K, Leif P (2005) Spatial and temporal b value anomalies preceding the devastating off coast of NW Sumatra earthquake of December 26, 2004, Geophysical Research Letters 32:1-4.
    24.
  24. Philippe V, Jean-Robert G, Jean-Luc C, Michel F (1992) b-value, aseismic deformation and brittle failure within an isolated geological object: evidences from a dome structure loaded by fluid extraction, Geophysical research letter 19:1149-1152.
    25.
  25. Pulama T (2013) Seismic Study and Spatial Variation of b-value in Northeast India, IOSR Journal of Applied Physics 4:31-40.
    26.
  26. Rachel EA (1996) The magnitude-frequency distribution of earthquakes recorded with deep seismometers at Cajon Pass, Southern California, Tectonophysics 261:1-7.
    27.
  27. Rhoades DA (1996) Estimation of the Gutenberg-Richter relation allowing for individual earthquake magnitude uncertainties, Tectonophysics 258:71-83.
    28.
  28. Rune O (1999) An estimation of the maximum b-value in the Gutenberg-Richter relation, Geodynamics 27:547-552.
    29.
  29. Schorlemmer D, Neri G, Wemer S, Mostaccio A (2003) Stability and significance tests of b-value anomalies: Example from the Tyrrhenian Sea, Geophysical Research Letters 30:1-4.
    30.
  30. Scordilis EM (2006) Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude, Journal of Seismology 10:225-236.
    31.
  31. Sharma ML, Shanker D (2001) Estimation of Seismic hazard parameters in the Himalayas and its vicinity from mixed data files, ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 38:93-102.
    32.
  32. Thomas A, Jean-Philippe A, Jing LZ, Helene LC, Laurent B, John G, Jeff G, Marion T, Kristel C, Sapkota SN, Sudhir R, Prithvi S, Lin D, Mireille F (2012) Convergence rate across the Nepal Himalaya and interseismic coupling on the Main Himalayan Thrust: Implications for seismic hazard, Journal of Geophysical Research 117:1-16.
    33.
  33. Tormann T, Wiemer S, Mignan A (2014) Systematic survey of high-resolution b value imaging along California faults: Inference on asperities, Journal of Geophysical Research 119:2029-2054.
    34.
  34. Wang JH (1988) b values of shallow earthquakes in Taiwan, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 78: 1243–1254.
    35.
  35. Wiemer S (2001) A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP, seismological Research letter 72:374-383.
    36.
  36. Wiemer S, Benoit JP (1996) Mapping the b-value anomaly at 100 km depth in the Alaska and New Zealand subduction zones, Geophysical Research Letter 23:1557-1560.
    37.
  37. Wiemer S, Wyss M (1997) Mapping the frequency-magnitude distribution in asperities: An improved technique to calculate recurrence time, Journal of Geophysical Research 102:115-128.
    38.
  38. Woessner J, Wiemer S (2005) Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 95:684-698.
    39.
  39. Wyss M, Habermann R (1988) Precursory seismic quiescence, Pure Applied Geophysics 126:319-332.
    40.
  40. Yilmazturk A, Bayrak Y, Çakir O (1999) Crustal seismicity in and around Turkey, Natural Hazards 18:253–267.
    41.
  41. Yusuf B, Serkan O (2002) Lateral variations of the modal (a/b) values for the different regions of the world, Journal of Geodynamics 34:653-666.
    42.
  42. Zhou P, Xia S, Sun J, Cao J, Xu H, Zhao F, Chen C (2018) Spatial Variations of b-Values in the Coastal Area of Guangdong, Journal of Ocean University of Chine 17:177-185.
    43.

Related articles

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2021-2024

Home| Login| About Us| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]