ملاحظات برنامه‌ریزی، ویژگی‌های فضایی و اصول طراحی منظر کشاورزی شهری مطابق با الگوی باغ ایرانی
محورهای موضوعی : معماری
1 - بیرجند- استادیار دانشگاه بیرجند- دانشکده هنر
کلید واژه: باغ ایرانی, کشاورزی شهری, اصول طراحی, معماری منظر,
چکیده مقاله :
این مطالعه در پاسخ به این پرسش است که چه ویژگی‌های فضایی در باغ ایرانی می‌تواند اصول طراحی منظر کشاورزی را معرفی نماید. هدف، بررسی اصول ادغام منظر کشاورزی و منظر زینتی در باغ ایرانی و معرفی اصول تلفیق عناصر گیاهی مثمر و زینتی در ساختار فضاهای سبز تاریخی است. این مطالعه با روش پژوهش در طراحی و مورد پژوهی با انجام مطالعات میدانی در هفت باغ تاریخی واقع در سه استان مختلف به انجام رسیده است. جنبه‌های سخت‌افزاری سازمان‌دهی فضایی و چیدمان فیزیکی- بصری عناصر مولد و زینتی در باغ ایرانی به‌گونه‌ای است که بر اساس آن می‌توان چهاراصل مهم را به‌عنوان قواعد معماری منظر مثمر معرفی نمود. اصل تفکیک فیزیکی بر جدایی فضای تولیدی از محورهای تفرجی تأکید دارد. اصل دوم، ترکیب بصری دو نوع نظام گیاهی در نگاه ناظر را مهم می‌شمارد. اصل سوم بر تداوم کاربرد دو اصل قبلی در کل فضای منظر و اصل مدیریت دسترسی گویای استراتژی محدودیت دسترسی به محصولات خوراکی منظر است.
Urban agriculture encompasses all production activities in urban areas and their surrounding regions. While in the past two decades, worldwide interest in urban agriculture has rapidly increased, Iranian administrations and researchers did not pay adequate attention to this significant field of landscape and urbanism. Persian garden is one of the main capabilities of Iranian cities in the field of urban agriculture. Although many studies have previously been carried out on the Persian garden, the agricultural landscapes of the historical gardens have yet remained neglected. However, one aspect of the Persian garden that has received little attention is the circumstances of integrating the agricultural and recreational landscapes into the garden design system. Therefore, the main goal of this study is to provide functional suggestions on acquiring the multidimensional identity of the productive landscapes of the Persian garden as a multifunctional open space for the landscapes and green spaces' design projects to be carried out in the future. Landscape architects in Iran are educated and trained to understand design considerations for establishing a public green space. But most of these professionals do not have sufficient experience in utilizing the Iranian tradition of landscaping. For a long time, the agricultural and productive identity of the Persian garden has been forgotten and neglected. Thus, this study seeks to answer the following questions: What spatial features in Persian gardens can provide the criteria for designing new multifunctional landscapes? Based on the Persian garden model, which planning and design considerations should be considered by landscape architects to integrate agriculture into public landscapes? This study was benefited from two research methods, including the design of research and case study. The basic data were collected from library sources, interviews with garden managers, experts and consultants, and some gardeners on seven historic gardens. Field studies were also carried out by the author in three different provinces (South Khorasan, Yazd, and Kerman). Having a specialized toolbox of the guidelines for integrating the agricultural landscape into the development of open spaces can be a significant challenge for landscape designers. This study showed that historical landscapes and Persian gardens can provide local and traditional criteria for planning and designing productive landscapes (consisting of edible and non-edible plants). As a basic guideline, the agricultural fields and the recreational zones should be separated. The second guideline states that access to the edible landscape in the Persian garden has special rules that provide access to the garden fruits under a hierarchical system. Thus, by applying the creativity of the environment design, the agricultural scenery will come to the attention of the visitors in the form of discovery and intuition. Besides, the visual combination of both edible and ornamental plant systems enhances the aesthetic sceneries of the landscape. Therefore, under the experience of the Persian garden, the visual approach to urban agriculture should not be underestimated. The next guideline is the importance of continuing physical separation and visual composition throughout the site and not limiting the application of these guidelines to some places.
اخوان، شمیم؛ و معقولی، نادیا (1399). مطالعۀ اثربخشی الگوهای ذهنی حاکمان تیموری بر باغ سازی تیموری با رویکرد تاریخ فرهنگی (نمونه موردی: باغ‌های نو، شمال و میدان در سمرقند). باغ نظر (17)83، 31-40.
پایگاه باغ‌های تاریخی خراسان جنوبی. (1398). آرشیو اسناد و نقشه‌ها. بیرجند: منتشرنشده.
فرزین، سامان؛ خلیل‌نژاد، سید محمدرضا؛ مراد زاده، سعیده؛ و زارعی، علی (1399). بررسی ویژگی‌های منظر چند عملکردی در باغ ایرانی (مطالعه موردی: میراث جهانی باغ اکبریه). منظر (12)52، 6-17.
کمپفر، انگلبرت (1360). س‍ف‍رن‍ام‍ه انگلبرت. (ک‍ی‍ک‍اوس ج‍ه‍ان‍داری، مترجم). ت‍ه‍ران: خوارزمی (نشر اثر اصلی 1727).
Bryant, C., Diaz, J. P., Keratia, B., Lohrberg, F. & Yokohari, M. (2016). Urban agriculture from a global perspective in Lohrberg F., Licka, L., Scazzosi, L. & Timpe, A. (Eds.), Urban Agriculture Europe. Berlin: Jovis.
Clark, K. H., & Nicholas, K. A. (2013). Introducing urban food forestry: A multifunctional approach to increase food security and provide ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology, 28(9), 1649–1669.
Clavijo, R. G. & Strange, G. L. (1928). Embassy to Tamerlane 1403-1406. London: Routledge.
Colinas, J., Bush, P., & Manaugh, K. (2019). The socio-environmental impacts of public urban fruit trees: A Montreal case-study. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 45, 2-17.
Della Valle, P. (1658). Viaggi di Pietro della Valle Il Pellegrino Descritti da lui medesimo in Lettere Familiari all’Erudito suo Amico Mario Schipano Divisi in Tre Parti cioè: La Turchia, la Persia e l’India colla Vita e Ritratto dell’Autore. Brighton: Gancia.
Gharipour, M. (2011). Transferring and Transforming the Boundaries of Pleasure: Multifunctionality of Gardens in Medieval Persia. Garden History, 39(2), 249-262.
Gharipour, M. (2013). Persian gardens and pavilions: reflections in history, poetry, and the arts. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.
Gmelin, S. G. (2015). Travels through Northern Persia: 1770-1774. (Willem Floor, Translator). Washington, DC: Mage Publishers.
Golombek, L. (1994). The Gardens of Timur: New Perspectives. Muqarnas Online, 12(1), 137–47.
Gori, A., Ferrini, F., & Fini, A. (2019). Growing healthy food under heavy metal pollution load : Overview and major challenges of tree based edible landscapes. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 45, 0–1.
Hou, J., & Grohmann, D. (2018). Integrating community gardens into urban parks: Lessons in planning, design and partnership from Seattle. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 33, 46–55.
Hale, J., Knapp, C., Bardwell, L., Buchenau, M., Marshall, J., Sancar, F., & Litt, J. S. (2011). Connecting food environments and health through the relational nature of aesthetics: Gaining insight through the community gardening experience. Social Science & Medicine, 72(11), 1853–1863.
Heimlich, J., Sydnor, T. D., Bumgardner, M., & O’Brien, P. (2008). Attitudes of residents toward street trees on four streets in Toledo, Ohio, U.S. before removal of ash trees (Fraxinus spp.) from Emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 34(1), 47–53.
Herbert, T. (1634). A Relation of Some Yeares Travaile Begunne Anon 1626. Into Afrique and the greater Asia, especially the Territories of the Persian Monarchie: and some parts of the Orientall Indies, and Iles adiacent. London: William Stansby & Jacob Bloome.
Khalilnezhad, M. R. (2016). Urban agriculture as a tool for city and landscape planning in Iran with emphasis on the role of Persian gardens. Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern.
Lafontaine-Messier, M., Gélinasb, N., & Olivier, A. (2016). Profitability of food trees planted in urban public green areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16, 197–207.
Morckel, V. (2015). Community gardens or vacant lots? Rethinking the attractiveness and seasonality of green land uses in distressed neighborhoods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), 714–721.
Napawan, N. C. (2014). Production Places: Evaluating Communally- Managed Urban Farms as Public Space. Landscape Journal, 34(1), 37-56.
Raupp, M. J., Cumming, A. B., & Raupp, E. C. (2006). Street tree diversity in eastern North America and its potential for tree loss to exotic borers. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 32(6), 297–304.
Ruggles, D. Fairchild. (2008). Islamic Gardens and Landscapes. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Teuber, S., Schmidt, K., Kühn, P., & Scholten, T. (2019). Engaging with urban green spaces – a comparison of urban and rural allotment gardens in Southwestern Germany. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 43, 235-250.
Shandiz, M. & Jacobs, P. (2005). Analyse du Jardin Royal de Fin en Perse (fin XVIe—XVIIe) d'aprés les source historiques. Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes, 25(4), 273-296.
Shandiz, M. H. (2012). Retour aux sources pour une meilleure reconnaissance et valorisation du patrimoine paysager perse. Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes, 32(3), 164-181.
Swaffield, S. (2017). Case studies in Brink, A., Bruns, D., Tobi, H., & Bell, S. (Eds). Research in Landscape Architecture Methods and methodology (pp. 188-211). London and New York: Routledge.
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
_||_